I have thought so much about the over hype of the Royal Wedding lately and how to put into words what I was feeling about it. I admit that I did tape and watch it, and yes it was a beautiful thing to watch. However, the amount of money the US spent on the media coverage of it is ludicrous.
Anyone breathing knew that the wedding was April 29th. We didn’t need to be reminded of it 24-7. We didn’t need to spend weeks speculating what Kate was going to wear. The coverage on that point alone was embarrassing. It’s been non-stop overkill since their engagement.
We’ve had to watch and rewatch Diana’s wedding to Charles. Why show that? It crumbled and ended in a nasty public divorce. It was no fairy tale like it’s made out to be. Yet, images of Diana in all of her 19 years of innocence keep being played over and over.
Kate Middleton is a bright and confident woman. She spent years with William prior to their marriage today. She knows full well what she is getting into and we don’t really need the press to tell us. WE KNOW.
We need our press to cover other more important issues that are going on right now. I know that the wedding was a nice diversion but a few hours of coverage would have sufficed. Not weeks and weeks of the money that has been spent covering it.
As I searched to find the right words to express my feelings on this I found a piece written by Dan Rather today. It says perfectly what I wanted to say so I defer this day to him. Thanks Dan, you took the words out of my mouth, only much better.
“The next time you hear about another round of layoffs at a TV news division, the closing of a bureau, the decision not to cover a foreign story with full force, remember this week of silliness in April.
Remember the millions of dollars, hundreds of staff and hours of coverage spent on a wedding in London when crises around the globe and here at home festered. Remember the unseemly pas de deux between the press and a reality TV show huckster peddling racially-fraught falsehoods, as both interviewers and the interviewee seek a bump in ratings.
And then please take a moment to remember the eight American soldiers and one contractor killed by an Afghan soldier at the Kabul airport in a war too easily forgotten. Remember the hundreds likely being killed in Syria and Libya, not to mention the death and unrest plaguing countries like the Ivory Coast, which almost never earn more than a mention on our most-watched newscasts.
Remember those who have the least amongst us, struggling after more than a year of unemployment, a long commute they can no longer afford, or the diagnosis of a medical condition that could kill them and bankrupt their family.
The networks couldn’t ignore the devastating storms that killed hundreds in the South, but you had the odd juxtaposition of that news being delivered by anchors sitting in front of Buckingham Palace.
There’s always the question, is the audience chasing the news or the news chasing an audience? I have nothing against the royals or their wedding. It is a legitimate news story, a big event for one of America’s most stalwart allies. We have had a lot of bad news lately, and if you are someone who finds this diversion interesting and exciting, then I think that’s great.
What bothers me is the hypocrisy. The idea that we can’t afford to throw resources at an important foreign story, but can afford to spend this kind of money on a story like the royal wedding is just plain wrong. The idea that we can’t break into regularly-scheduled programming for an address by the president is wrong as well. When the topic was the “Birther Story” (better referred from here on out by the first letters of those two words), the networks jumped right in.
As a journalist, you like to be the one asking the questions. But it’s time that some of our news executives gave some answers of their own.”
Dan Rather is the managing editor and global correspondent for Dan Rather Reports, which airs Tuesdays on HDNet at 8 p.m. and 11 p.m. ET