Dr. Trump's "medical team" won't give Hillary a clean bill of health

“Fox ‘News’ crack team of physicians joined Sean Hannity to natter about Hillary Clinton’s health and whether the right-wing crazies who claim her health is bad were onto anything.

This is your daily reminder of the Fox Effect. It begins on the wingnut sites and social media, when someone dredges up something from the past and makes it look terrible, makes a lot of noise about it, and advances it up the food chain to that bastion of objectivity, Fox News.

They brought in Dr. Marc Siegel, a completely unbiased, totally scientific guy who once proclaimed that President Obama was the ‘wrong Commander-in-Chief’ to wage a war on cancer. Siegel also believes we have ‘too much health insurance,’ and claims that worrying about the safety of cops ‘imperils our health.'”   [crooksandliars.com]


In the latest of right-wing attacks

It is stamina Hillary lacks.

And a secret she cloaks

Is she may have had strokes,

Of course diagnosed by the Trump quacks.



Leave a comment
  • Yeah, Dr. Drew, that "right-wing" crazy, is concerned about Hillary's health.

    Because you can't believe your own eyes and the spastic and convulsing reactions she has had in now number of situations, not to mention the stumbling and loss of balance and coughing, I guess in the Orwellian world of progressives bad health is good.

    Hillary could be a corpse and you would declare her healthy.

  • In reply to Chef Boy RD:

    She has produced her health records. Trump has produced something from a doctor who says he's in amazingly good health without any specifics.

    You forgot to mention the pillows she sits on. Drudge reported it. I'm sure you're familiar with him.

  • In reply to Chef Boy RD:

    Since when is the creator of Barfaroni a medical expert. You claimed I knifed into a "journalist," publish your medical credentials, or what culinary school attended.

    Again, I bet we don;t see you again until your next hit and hide.

  • Both sides can find experts to make diagnoses without examining the patient. On August 15 the NY Times reported on mental health professionals diagnosing Donald Trump's mental condition, including one who called him a "malignant and psychopathic narcissist." More than two thousand psychiatrists, psychologists and therapists signed a "manifesto" declaring "Trumpism" a public threat. http://citizentherapists.com/manifesto/

    I doubt that advocate-experts are either reliable or ethical for either side and that as citizens we are better off relying on information we can assess and sources in which we have some trust.

  • In reply to jnorto:

    Totally agree.

  • In reply to jnorto:

    Makes sense.

    However, like "You don't need a weatherman..." (Bob Dylan, SDS, or whatever), you don't need to be a psychiatrist to know that one candidate acts nuts.

    This seems more like the National Enquirer push to elect Trump. I saw, on the way to some cash register, an Enquirer cover of 350 LB HILLARY and BILL NEAR DEATH. Now, if they are going to go all WEEKLY WORLD NEWS and Photoshop something, make it the Man from Mars and not someone who is on television every night, including Jimmy Kimmel Live tonight. That makes me wonder if Trump will do the late night circuit again, as, unlike some of the cable news channels, late night hosts don't take any cr@p.

  • In reply to jack:

    So summarizing 'The doctors are bias, but I, Jack, can see the truth. The spin jockeys on late night talk shows are tough objective purveyors of news.'

    Does that pretty much sum it up?

  • In reply to 4zen:

    Did you read jnorto's perspicacious comment?

  • In reply to Aquinas wired:

    I did and I actually agree, but of course that is not good enough for Jack.

  • In reply to 4zen:

    What isn't good enough for Jack is that Jimmy Greenfield hasn't revoked your privileges yet.

    Other than that, you haven't proven that you know Jack, so don't make assessments on my part.

  • In reply to 4zen:

    Also,. you've proven AGAIN that you don't have reading comprehension, as I replied to jnorto "Makes sense." So the Trumpanista is only here to foment more dissention.

  • In reply to jack:

    No, you wrote 'makes sense'...'however...yak, yak, yak.'...you have no middle ground, ever. Nobody knows anything but you and mom.

    Please explain why Jimmy should revoke, behond me calling 'bullsht' to an unsubstantiated assertion. If that's the worst thing you've heard in mom's basement then maybe you need to get out with the boys.

  • In reply to 4zen:

    You already received your answer, and also why I don't engage in these dialogs with you. As Jane McManus said yesterday, one can't have a rational argument with someone without the facts. That suits you to a tee.

    And since you agreed with jnorto, you also have to agree that the trolls your candidate sent out yesterday on this issue are incorrect, and thus I look to you to repudiate them. But I'm sure you'll drag up some red herring on why you didn't agree with jnorto.

  • In reply to 4zen:

    Your facts come from the mouths of late night comedians, you take it as gospel, 'Lord help us.'

    My agreement with Jnorto is in his second paragraph (and it isn't the NYT editorial), which should of been admitted years ago.

    Far as not engaging me, please feel free to zip your lip.

  • In reply to 4zen:

    On the other hand, you get your "facts" from Breitbart (what, now that its editor is in charge of your candidate's campaign, he isn't paying to you post garbage?), you twist others words, you deal with red herrrings such as Hillary voting for Iraq, but ignoring that Pence did, you complain about "have you stopped beating your wife" questions, but engage in them, you try to lead people down irrelevant paths such as "do you watch gladiator movies" to try to trap them, you don't have the brains to be civil to the Community Manager; and you are guilty of projection of your own mental disabilities, like bigotry. Another example is your "not one post of Anti-Semitism," when I have documented a whole pattern of it. I have no obligation to answer a leading question.

    That's obvious from from what you type. I don't care if you do it because you can't beat 90 on your GroupOn golf, but you have no standing to tell me to zip it. Instead maybe you should get lost.

    Remember, of course, how many votes you have obtained for the fascist candidate.

  • If the Tribune is correct, neither the statue nor the demagogue it represents has no clothes, and dupes like the one above are really filling their diapers:

    "Trump's immigration plan: Deport 'bad ones,' treat 'the rest' like Obama does "

    Note the word "Obama" in it.

    Need I repeat the word "dupes?"

  • In reply to jack:

    In other words Trump's new immigration policy is exactly Obama's.
    What he has been feeding his sheep for so many months has been pure barnyard droppings.

    Of course, his troops will keep lock-stepping with him. According to him. We'll see.

  • In reply to Aquinas wired:

    I wonder how the America Firsters will react when they are told that if they vote for Trump they will get the Obama immigration plan.

  • BTW, apropos to the original topic, Trump's own health should be of some concern. His ruddy complexion, which gets deeper when he fulminates, suggests high blood pressure. And his physical appearance indicates he is not eating healthy foods.

  • In reply to Aquinas wired:

    ...like the Taco salad in the Trump Tower deli.

    Maybe related, and while I am not going to say anything about the draft lottery, I wonder how Trump suddenly went from 1-A to 1-Y, to 4-F.

    But I am sure you are still more concerned about the health of his tax return, including auditing any "charitable contributions" line item.

  • In reply to Aquinas wired:

    As probably predictable, Trump's doctor told NBC News that his letter on Trump's physical condition was essentially a fraud.

  • Breaking News: Obamacare exasperating inequality! Fail.

    In Other News: Man educated by late comedians wrestles with pickle jar to cure his dementia.

  • In reply to 4zen:

    I'm truly sorry you couldn't open the pickle jar this morning 4zen. Got the shakes when you read that "Trump's immigration plan: Deport 'bad ones,' treat 'the rest' like Obama does "?

    Breitbarrt quit paying you, so now ZeroHedge does? Still trolling the right wing blogs, aren't you troll?

  • In reply to 4zen:

    Regarding your breaking news, why does a source called "Liberty Blitzkrieg Blog" neither bring comfort nor inspire confidence?

  • In reply to jnorto:

    "Jawhol, mein Führer" as 4zen goosesteps into oblivion.

    Some web sources indicate that the blog is based in Austria, just like der Führer was.

  • In reply to 4zen:

    Also, you must have been talking about yourself, as I did not watch JKL last night, but a recap on the radio had a pickle jar reference. So Mr. Unorginality strikes again in the guise of someone who signed in as 4zen.
    This is now the fourth time you have been outed.
    And you have now admitted that you are exposed to late night comedians, but as jnorto points out, you post from Euiropean right wing blogs.

Leave a comment