Are Muslims Supposed to "Kill All the Infidels"? (Part I)

Now that we understand that it is not proper to call all non-Muslims “infidels,” is it all moot? Does it all not matter because, as I have been told time and again, Islam calls for the murder of non-Muslims? I mean this perception is so pervasive and entrenched in the minds of many people. “Well,” I am sure many are saying to me, “it is because of the fact that all terrorists are Muslims.” That’s not actually the case, but judging by the media reporting, I can understand this perception.

Still, I really do not know from where the contention that Islam says “kill the infidels” comes.

“It is the Qur’an, you idiot!!!” I am quite sure some of you just screamed that to your computer screen. Really? Where? I do not know of one verse which directs the believers to kill all “infidels.” Yet, I am constantly reminded of the contrary, such as this verse:

“Now when you meet the unbelievers, smite their necks until you overcome them fully…” (47:4).

Or this one:

“O you who have attained to faith! Fight against those unbelievers who are near you and let them find you adamant, and know that God is with those who are conscious of Him” (9:123).

Or this one:

“O Prophet! Strive hard (lit., make “jihad”) against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be adamant with them… ” (66:73).

Yet, perhaps the “poster child” of all the verses in the Qur’an which are cited as evidence that Islam calls for the murder of infidels is this one, the so-called “Verse of the Sword”:

“Slay the pagans wherever you may come upon them, and take them captive, and besiege them, and lie in wait for them at every conceivable place…” (9:5).

Case closed? Wrong. These verses have a context, and when understood in their proper context, it will become quite clear that the verses cited above are not a carte blanche for Muslims to kill all non-Muslims.

Before I address specific verses, however, a few general principles of the Qur’an when it comes to fighting must be explained. Also, I rely almost exclusively upon Muhammad Asad’s explanation of the Qur’an as my source material. Let us begin, then.

In the Qur’an, the principle of fighting is purely self-defensive. According to all available Traditions, the earliest verses revealed with regards to fighting are these:

“Permission [to fight] is given to those against whom war is being wrongfully waged and, verily, God has indeed the power to succour them; those who have been driven from their homelands against all right for no other reason than their saying, ‘Our sustainer is God!'” (22:39-40).

Along with this verse is 2:190, which says:

“And fight in God’s cause against those who wage war against you…”

Thus, it is quite clear that fighting is to be done in self-defense. Now, anyone can commit acts of terror and aggression and say, “it’s in self-defense.” In fact, that is precisely what Al Qaeda is doing: they claim by killing 3,000 people in New York City and Washington, D.C., they are “defending” the Muslim nation against “Zionist and Crusader” aggression against the Muslims. What sheer rubbish, the product of a sick and twisted criminal mind.

The Qur’an clearly states, in the remainder of 2:190 it says:

“…but do not commit aggression, for verily, God does not love aggressors.”

“Committing aggression” includes killing innocent civilians in Tel Aviv, Beslan, New York, Baghdad, or wherever. Furthermore, when the enemy ceases its hostility, fighting must cease:

“…but if they desist, then all hostility shall cease, save against those who [willfully] do wrong” (2:193).

Another verse repeats this insistence that hostility must cease when the enemy stops its aggression against you:

“But if they [the enemy] incline to peace, incline thou to it as well, and place thy trust in God: verily, He alone is all-hearing, all-knowing! And should they seek but to deceive thee [by their show of peace] – behold, God is enough for thee! He it is who has strengthened thee with His succour, and by giving thee believing followers” (8:61-62).

Thus, even if the enemy is feigning a peaceful posture, the Muslims are still commanded to cease hostility and “place their trust in God.” Thus, it is quite clear that fighting is in self-defense, and aggression is not allowed. Now, Muslims have waged wars of aggression in the past, for sure, and they even called them “jihad against the infidels” in order to justify their desire for territorial expansion. In fact, one of the most pertinent examples of this was the Ummayad Dynasty, which enacted a policy of “jihad” as perpetual warfare. But, such a policy is not Islamically correct, and as the collapse of the Ummayad Dynasty showed, not sustainable.

Still, the point of the matter is, the framework underlying fighting in Islam is self-defense, and all other verses which deal with fighting or call on the believers to “fight the unbelievers” must be understood in this framework.

Yet, this begs the question: why are these verses even in the Qur’an at all? Why fight at all? What was the historical context of these verses of the Qur’an which tell the believers to “fight the unbelievers”? It was a very violent one.

From the very beginnings of his ministry, the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was violently opposed by his people. They tortured and even killed some of his followers. They never relented in their violent oppostion for more than 13 years, including a boycott of him and his family that ended up costing the lives of his uncle – who protected him – and his beloved wife, Khadijah. This opposition culminated in the expulsion of the Prophet north to the city of Yathrib.

Even after he left, the Meccans attacked the Muslims time and again, waging several battles against the Prophet and his followers. The pagan tribes attempted to assassinate the Prophet on several occasions, in fact. (For a more detailed account of the Prophet’s story, see here.)

It is in this violent context that the verse 9:5 was revealed, and we will go into a full explanation in the next post (or two)…


Leave a comment
  • Why the strong insistence on quoting the Qur'an and putting things in "context" in your blog?

    Many Christians and Jews today have evolved to simply drop verses in the Bible and Torah that they don't believe in, or feel do not properly fit in their lives.

    Why the insistence on upholding, by subjectively contextualizing, line-by-line of the Qur'an? Is it because it is supposedly divinely written? Can you just simply say certain verses in Qur'an suck and are not good, like many Christians and Jews have done with their sacred texts?

  • These are some of the most common and pervasive misconceptions about Islam. Wih the elections coming around, it is a good opportunity to explain these fallacies.

    As far as simply saying some verses "suck," as a devout Muslim I'm not prepared to say that. Yet I don't just have to write off this or that verse as it "sucks," because it has a very clear context and explanation. That's what I'm trying to share.

  • In reply to Hesham Hassaballa:

    "...because it has a very clear context and explanation."

    I don't think this is true.

    If it was true then there would be no issue today with less moderate Muslims "misinterpreting" verses as their sole source to do what they do. It is not only unclear, it seems incredibly unclear to a certain number within Islam.

    Anybody can "contextualize" a religious verse to pursue their own personal aims, good or bad. That's the problem with the insistence on keeping and upholding verses. Nobody's personal interpretation of a verse can ever be universal.

  • I respect what you have to say. Nevertheless, what I will post is what I, and what I believe to be the overwhelming majority of Muslims, believe about these belligerent verses.

Leave a comment