'Championship Writing' -- Pet peeves

'Championship Writing' -- Pet peeves
Source: Reusableart.com

Another of my ten favorites among the 50 chapters of “Championship Writing” by writing coach Paula LaRocque is Chapter 16, “Pet peeves: Go ahead, ax me about irregardless.”

(Whew. Typing that subtitle hurt!)

For previous chapters covered in this series of posts on LaRocque’s book, try these links for tips about writing that’s bumpy or smooth, using short words, or concerned about fads or  grammar.

In “Pet peeves,” LaRocque writes, “Most people are passionate about what they consider misuse of the language.”

(That “what they consider” gets my radar going … who’s considering it incorrectly?)

She adds that “our language and its proper use are dear to us.” In other words, especially here, we’re Serious about them.

“Some countries,” LaRocque writes, “even have ministries of language charged with preserving the purity of the mother tongue.”

That once sounded like a glorious idea to me. But since I read George Orwell’s “1984,”  I haven’t been as sure of the idea. At this point, we non-governmental language mavens and aces need to be mindful of our responsibility.

What LaRocque calls “sensitivity” is why she says “we feel bound to correct others’ grammar or usage although we know it might embarrass them.”

Most of us, she points out, have what she calls “well-defined linguistic pet peeves.” The trouble is that sometimes, the pet peeve is a mistake. Examples she gives include “using couple or none as plural nouns, or beginning sentences with and or but.”

Even when people know their pet peeve is a mistake, LaRocque says, they still don’t like it.

One of the better descriptions in this chapter for me, a good mnemonic for the words, is about a colleague of LaRocque’s. She reports that when he hears literally and figuratively misused or confused, he “stops in his figurative tracks and grits his literal teeth.”

Finding similar ways to remember good usage is a great way to improve your own writing and speaking. Being sensitive to finding others’ memorable use of words can make your reading more fun, too.

For the first writing tip of the new year, “Spell-checkers,” come on back next Monday — or subscribe using the button above. Happy holidays!

Filed under: Expressions, Writing


Leave a comment
  • Personally, I don't see the point of "literally," when it is used to mean "actually." Only context in which I can conceive it is in the realm of contract construction in that it literally says something, in which case the words mean what they say, or it is ambiguous.

  • In reply to jack:

    Ah. Thanks for the defense of "actually." Actually, it could use the help.

  • I'm sorry to be late to the discussion, but the pet peeve most recently irritating me is the use of the word "issue" as in "She has health issues." If she is ill, she has health problems, not issues. Congress, as it considers the Affordable Care Act, will have health issues. Doctors puzzling over a diagnosis will have health issues. Sick patients have problems. It is not a matter for debate.

  • In reply to jnorto:

    Thanks, jnorto. As you see, I'm not all that speedy myself, so please don't worry about timing and join in whenever you want to do so. Thank you for an excellent distinction between "issues" and "problems." I think people who avoid using "problems" are trying to avoid offending anyone, and I'm here to say that doesn't work -- they offend me.

Leave a comment