Here's evidence that the 2020 presidential election was rigged.

It’s the other side of the story that the Jan. 6 committee has ignored. Judge for yourself.

“Trump continues to insist without evidence that the 2020 election was stolen…” — typical news story.

Well, then, here’s some evidence that you won’t get from the New York Times, Washington Post, CNN. MSNBC and other legacy media that are captured by the left. I post this as a pubic service.

Watch the complete 2000 Mules, a documentary by Dinesh D’Souza. Don’t you dare respond to this post by saying that D’Souza is a discredited right-winger. Only responses to the substance are allowed.

And more than an hour of carefully presented and reasonable substance is presented.

Using the scientific method of geotracking, in collaboration with TrueTheVote, researchers were able to identify and document “mules” who were stuffing unguarded ballot boxes. Here is a description of how absentee ballots are collected. How mail fraud is the easiest to carry out. Of vote “harvesting.”

Meet people who were physically or mentally unable to vote, but were recorded as having voted. Whistleblowers who described how the fraud was carried out. Some of it carried out brazenly in the sunlight. Watch video of a box being stuff at 3 a.m. in the dark. How the stuffers are wearing gloves to avoid leaving fingerprints. And taking pictures of the ballot boxes to prove to their handlers that they really were at the scene.

Learn how left-leaning, heavily financed shadow organizations by the likes of magnate Mark Zuckerberg attempted to skirt voting law by pouring millions into third party organizations to draw in Democratic votes.

Weigh the evidence of the the number of compromised ballots could have given Trump enough votes to have beaten President Joe Biden. See which states presumably could have overturned the election.

For some, this is enough evidence to prove the existence of an organized effort to subvert an election. Of suborning democracy.

For some, the case needs further evidence. Others will dismiss it entirely. In my view, it is at least enough evidence to launch a criminal investigation into fraud and whatever election laws might have been broken. It is enough evidence, I believe, to produce a grand jury indictment and perhaps a jury’s guilty verdict.

At the least, it puts to rest the Democrat claptrap that 2020 was the most secure ever. Whether this is a smoking gun will be up to you to decide, after you get both sides of the story. Twenty million people have already view the movie and 77 percent agree with its conclusions.

What to do about this massive fraud, conservatives might ask. The documentary’s only answer is to vote.

D’Souza’s mistake, in my view, is charging to download this streaming video. What this needs more than anything is exposure to fair-minded Americans who believe there are at least two sides to every story.

/To subscribe to The Barbershop, type your email address in the box and click the “create subscription” button. My list is completely spam free, and you can opt out at any time.

Filed under: Uncategorized

Tags: 2000 Mules, 2020 election

Comments

Leave a comment
  • I've seen this documentary. If nothing else is addressed regarding voter fraud, at least the mail in ballot & absentee ballots should be closely scrutinized. The "harvesting" of these ballots should be outlawed...seems to be no way to accurately prove who actually filled these ballots out. Statistics are hard to fool. When 90% of these harvested ballots, many of them counted way too late, are in favor of only one party when statistically almost half of the voters in the country voted for the other party...well that is an statistic anomaly suggesting something very wrong with election integrity. I don't think enough votes were affected to change the election results but it sure shows that some nefarious forces were at work trying to jig the results.

  • Even Bill Barr called 2000 Mules a farce. If it's your idea of "evidence," then you need a better tin-foil hat.

  • In reply to Grundoon:

    And if you deny video evidence your are more brainwashed than we thought, you are so caught up in the lefts fairy tale world its ridiculous, this was NOT a secure election or a fair one, states changed election laws during the election, you can't do that, stop rolling over to the corruption, it's embarrassing

  • "When 90% of these harvested ballots, many of them counted way too late, are in favor of only one party when statistically almost half of the voters in the country voted for the other party...well that is an statistic anomaly suggesting something very wrong with election integrity. I don't think enough votes were affected to change the election results but it sure shows that some nefarious forces were at work trying to jig the results."
    ------------------------------------------
    Wrong. The national election results were close, but localities could be very lopsided. Urban areas went for Biden in a big way, rural areas went Trump. So only the mathematically ignorant would call the result a statistical anomaly.

    And that's before you get to the point that the movie's methodology is flawed. Then there's the small matter that even the producer admitted that the ballots were legitimate. He just didn't like the fact that maybe they were cast when they otherwise wouldn't have been. A clear case of desiring voter suppression.

  • "Then there's the small matter that even the producer admitted that the ballots were legitimate. He just didn't like the fact that maybe they were cast when they otherwise wouldn't have been. A clear case of desiring voter suppression."

    When it hits the fan - and it certainly will - I'm going to love watching all the "Grundoons" out there scramble for cover. Voter suppression? Oh, please! When you start changing election laws in violation of the Constitution, I think it's time that even those with half a brain start asking questions. People who weren't going to vote in the first place suddenly show up like roaches when the lights go off because "Zuckerbucks" poured into their districts and lured them from their "safe places." Whatever happened to just one "election day?" Why suspend the requirement for verifying signatures on mail-in ballots? Grundoon? Hang in there, buddy!

  • The only voter fraud that exists occurs only when Republicans win. Why? Because the Grundoons of the world can't possibly conceive of a Republican winning because...because... a progressive, socialist authoritarian Democrat is...is just GOOD and there aren't enough rubes and dopes to vote the opposite. A Grundoon thinks Al Gore, Hillary, and Stacy Abrams won. Grundoons even insist there is no voter fraud in Cook County unless it is Republican voter fraud. Of course, the Grundoons are correct in this. Grundoons are always correct. Just ask CNN and the Democrat-Socialist-Authoritarians. It's Goebbels Law.

Leave a comment

  • Advertisement:
  • Advertisement:
  • ChicagoNow is full of win

    Welcome to ChicagoNow.

    Meet our bloggers,
    post comments, or
    pitch your blog idea.

  • Visit my new website

    I'm a freelance writer, editor and author. I can help you with a wide variety of projects. Check out my new website at www.dennisbyrne.net

  • Subscribe to The Barbershop

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

  • Dennis Byrne’s Facebook Fan Page

  • Like me on Facebook

  • Our National Debt

  • Twitter

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • In reply to Richard Davis:
      " Surprise us, you could be EB White reincarnated. " ------------------------------------- And you could be a kid in New Jersey…
      Read the story | Reply to this comment
    • In reply to Grundoon:
      Sure. It's the writing. I don't see your byline here or anywhere for that matter. You don't even have the…
      Read the story | Reply to this comment
    • In reply to Richard Davis:
      "Obviously, you have no capacity for dexterous thought." -------------------------------------- No, Richard, I have little tolerance for poor writing. As for…
      Read the story | Reply to this comment
    • In reply to HSPARKS:
      HSPARKS, there are Safe Haven laws in Illinois in which mothers can turn over newborn babies at hospitals, firehouses and…
      Read the story | Reply to this comment
    • In reply to Grundoon:
      Obviously, you have no capacity for dexterous thought. The mention of the companies leaving was an interjection for the general…
      Read the story | Reply to this comment
  • /Users/dennisby/Desktop/trailer.mp4
  • Latest on ChicagoNow

  • Advertisement: