Leonard Pitts Jr., it's you who's deplorable

Syndicated columnist Leonard Pitts Jr. rejected the idea of trying to “understand” supporters of President Donald Trump because they are a bunch of white, Christian Americans alarmed by the loss of their “pre-eminence.” (Do we really need to ‘understand’ Trump supporters?” as published in the Chicago Tribune.)

Pitts was responding to a reader who suggested in a “nice” email,  “We need to not close ourselves off to how the other side thinks.” Nice idea, Pitts responded, but not in these troubled times because those Trump supporters are trying to destroy democracy. Saith Pitts, claiming “the high moral ground here”:

But these are not normal times. Indeed, sometimes, I wonder if we appreciate just how abnormal — how fraught with danger — they really are. Under Trump, American laws, news media and mores are under assault, to say nothing of American democracy itself.

Let’s examine what’s under attack:

American laws? Mr. Pitts, that’s what democracy is about. Laws are proposed, laws are passed, laws are challenged, amended or taken off the books. Pitts’ objection is to the laws that Trump supporters back or oppose. But that’s not an assault on democracy.

News media? Put aside the question of whether the media deserve to be assaulted for their left-wing tendencies. I’ve been in the media for decades, but I don’t share Pitts’ sanctification of the media as an institution beyond criticism or even assault. The press has First Amendment protection, but that doesn’t mean that it is beyond the reach of criticism, even the nastiest kind. Feeling assaulted, Mr. Pitts? Brace up.

Mores? Whose? Self-styled progressives have long and relentlessly attacked traditional mores. They include the importance of fatherhood,  traditional marriage and sexual abstinence. And the sanctity of life. Who is it that’s pushing for the legalization of the “recreational” use of pot, ignoring the scientific research about its hazards? I could go on, but suffice to say, again, it’s a matter of the eye of the beholder, and Pitts’ eyes are clouded.

American democracy itself? This could be laughable if it weren’t so self-delusional. As one example, let’s check out how “progressives” are trying to snuff out free speech–an essential ingredient of democracy–on college campuses. Conservative, free speech that is. Free speech zones, trigger warnings and other hard left weapons are camouflaged as devices to protect free speech, but in reality are tools of the increasingly autocratic left to demonized and suppress speech they don’t agree with. In their ignorance (and to the disgrace of the left-wing faculty that dominates the campus) they try to legally suppress speech that hurts their feelings. Think I’m exaggerating? Too many college students, polls show, mistakenly believe that “hate” speech (as they define it) is not protected by the First Amendment. That you can punish students, including suspending them, for speech the left doesn’t like. That’s even though the Supreme Court has unanimously said that the First Amendment protects hate speech. Sadly, these tragic misunderstanding are oozing into the mainstream and justified by a host of “progressive” voices. (I put quotes around “progressives”  because they are anything but, advocating as they are for an autocratic, massive government.)

I didn’t vote for Trump and I’ve said nasty things about him. But I know people who have and do support him;  they no way fit Pitts’ bigoted and ignorant “understanding” of who they are. Some, in their youth, fought for racial equality and voted Democrat. They are not racists or the “deplorables”  as Hillary Clinton described them. They are decent people who care for their friends. They do good works.

Sadly, the Democrat Party  no longer is the party they supported. It has rejected the democratic value of listening respectfully and with an open mind to the opposition, as Pitts has so aptly demonstrated. It seeks to limit open, even raucous debate, of the kind that the Founding Fathers had in mind when they created a Constitution that featured separation of powers and individual rights.

So, yes, Pitts is deplorable.  He has lost sight of what a true democracy is and for his ignorant dehumanizing  of people he, in his arrogance, thinks he understands, but doesn’t.

dennis@dennisbyrne.net

www.dennisbyrne.net

My historical novel: Madness: The War of 1812

Comments

Leave a comment
  • fb_avatar

    You are kind of proving Pitts' point in your response. Are you saying that White Christians are NOT fearful of the changing demographics in America? You may say so, but the actions of the Christian Right do not back up your words. Christ's teachings were about inclusion and accepting those unfamiliar. I find it fascinating how you have justified the vile and ignorant actions of Trump and his supporters. These are NOT normal times.....THAT was the heart of Pitts' article. If you think this President and his supporters are just run of the mill folks.....God help us all....

  • How can anyone who claims to be a Christian support Trump and his Republican enablers?

    You forget, Dennis, the Founding Fathers left out a lot of voices in that 'raucous debate".

    To our friends who voted for Trump: Draining the swamp. How's that going?

  • "Pitts' objection is to the laws that Trump supporters back or oppose."

    I don't know whether this is ignorance or dishonesty, but its obvious a reference to Trumps public Obstruction of Justice, and repeated attempts to legitimize members of law enforcement who investigate him (FBI, Special Council).

    Trumps Muslim ban is also in clear violation of the first and fifth amendments.

    His refusal to divest in his business is a violation of the emoluments clause of the constitution, and now we've learned he is outright receiving bribes delivered through Cohen.

  • Regarding the above:

    1. Essentially, the author is a deplorable, as described by Hillary.

    2. The author is ignorant of history and of his friends.

    3. The author is either ignorant or dishonest.

    With the Left's and the Democrat Party's of its own deplorable actions, such as slavery, Jim Crow, internment of Japanese citizens, blocking little black girls from attending Little Rock schools, the non-support of the Civil Rights Act, the bigotry of low expectations of people of color, and now the attack on free speech and assembly, they had better take a long look in the mirror of history.

  • fb_avatar

    The president who posed the greatest threat to the free operation of American democracy is not Donald Trump, but was Barack Obama. It was he who by-passed Congress with the clearly unconstitutional executive order on DACA, whose Treasury Department continued to pay unappropriated subsidies to insurers losing money on their ACA participation, whose agreements on climate change and Iran’s galloping nuclear development ignored the treaty process, whose Justice Department obtained eavesdropping warrants on members of the media, whose Education Department issued the Title IX guidance letter that deprived students accused of sexual misconduct basic due process rights, who made unauthorized recess appointments — to name but some examples of his smug authoritarian approach to governance. I think that research would reveal about a half dozen 9-0 Supreme Court reversals of his separation of powers violations. Trump’s a blowhard jerk who I, too, refused to vote for, but he’s never DONE (as opposed to saying) anything approaching his slicker, more articulate predecessor’s assaults on the democratic process.

Leave a comment

  • Advertisement:
  • Advertisement:
  • ChicagoNow is full of win

    Welcome to ChicagoNow.

    Meet our bloggers,
    post comments, or
    pitch your blog idea.

  • Visit my new website

    I'm a freelance writer, editor and author. I can help you with a wide variety of projects. Check out my new website at www.dennisbyrne.net

  • Subscribe to The Barbershop

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

  • Dennis Byrne’s Facebook Fan Page

  • Like me on Facebook

  • Our National Debt

  • Twitter

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • The Dems will keep Jan 6 going till the next presidential election. Plus--will the committee look into the Ashlie Babbitt…
      Read the story | Reply to this comment
    • In reply to Get out of IL now!:
      I had the same reaction regarding Office Sicknick. I seem to recall that someone said that five people died in…
      Read the story | Reply to this comment
    • What immediately turned me off was two of the Capitol police testifying that Brian Sicknick died defending the Capitol. No,…
      Read the story | Reply to this comment
    • Thank you for posting that it could be just the thing to give inspiration to someone who needs it! Keep…
      Read the story | Reply to this comment
    • Thanks for sharing, I found a lot of interesting information here. A really good post, very thankful and helpful.
      Read the story | Reply to this comment
  • /Users/dennisby/Desktop/trailer.mp4
  • Latest on ChicagoNow

  • Advertisement: