More media bias against pro-life successes in Chicago

Yesterday I posted a story here that I thought important enough that readers, both progressives and conservatives, should know. It was the closing of the Albany Medical-Surgical Center Family Planning Associates abortion clinic after it was cited by the state for health and safety violations.

albanyIt represented a victory for women who had been victimized by the sometimes shoddy procedures at the North Side clinic; four women have died after going to the clinic for abortions. It also represented a victory for advocates for life, including the Pro-Life Action League, who had been trying for decades to get the state’s public health officials to look into the clinic’s violations.

Not one–not one–Chicago media outlet saw it that way. Not a single paragraph in the newspapers, not a 10-second mention on a newscast.

I started in the Chicago newspaper business in the mid-1960s I think I have some idea what constitutes news. That women will no longer be able to go to this neighborhood clinic for abortions, and instead will have to go to a non-licensed and allied facility downtown falls within the definition of legitimate news. Especially as it fits into the pro-choice script that pro-lifers are trying to end abortions by driving abortion clinics out of business.

Yes, there is a reluctance in newsrooms to report anything having to do with abortion. Whatever you write or report usually draws a flood of protests, challenging accuracy and bias, from both sides. I first was introduced to this phenomenon years ago when I wrote a story about whether the CTA should be allowed to accept pro-life advertising on its buses.


I survived. The newspaper (the Chicago Sun-Times) survived. We stood by the story, and backed the decision to run it because it represented an important public policy/free speech issue. It used to be called principles of journalism.

Are we now supposed to believe that Chicago’s newsroom have lost their courage? Or are we supposed to believe that newsroom liberal bias spiked the story.

Either way, it’s a sad day for Chicago journalism.

Visit my new freelance editorial services website at

Want to be notified by email when I post? Type your email address in the box and click the “create subscription” button. My list is completely spam free, and you can opt out at any time.


Leave a comment
  • Another sad day in months of years of sad days for the media bias in Chicago and elsewhere.

    The sad thing is, most of these media drones do not even realize they are biased: they think the way they think is how everybody does and should think -- and if they don't they have no right --yes, right, according to the media/politico elite-- to voice a difference.
    The media elite all hover together in their mostly white enclaves and send the appropriate ethnic reporter to the south and west sides. It's a good drinking game -- people should try it: spin the ethnic reporter.

    Glad you chose to swim upstream.

  • Channel Seven had the story on one of their early newscasts. Either 4/430 or Six.

  • In reply to Alan Rubenstein:

    Sorry that I missed it. Kudos to Channel 7, although it apparently didn't last long. Thanks for the information.

  • fb_avatar

    closed for "health and safety" reasons? another dirty, dangerous much for safe and least they still have legal

Leave a comment

  • Advertisement:
  • Advertisement:
  • ChicagoNow is full of win

    Welcome to ChicagoNow.

    Meet our bloggers,
    post comments, or
    pitch your blog idea.

  • Visit my new website

    I'm a freelance writer, editor and author. I can help you with a wide variety of projects. Check out my new website at

  • Subscribe to The Barbershop

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

  • Dennis Byrne’s Facebook Fan Page

  • Like me on Facebook

  • Our National Debt

  • Twitter

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

  • /Users/dennisby/Desktop/trailer.mp4
  • Latest on ChicagoNow

  • Advertisement: