First and Big Ten

« Dear Rich Rod & Michigan: Three's The Big Ten's Best 11: No. »

Three Quarterbacks? You Can't Be Serious

user-pic
Tim Cary

Excuse me, Rich Rodriguez--what did you just say?

I'm sorry, really I am...but I must not have heard you right.

It sounded like you just said your football team would play three quarterbacks next weekend against Western Michigan.
Obviously, I misunderstood you.  Or maybe you misspoke.  Because there's no way th...
 
Oh, I'm sorry.  Apparently that IS what you said.  Now are you sure that's what you MEANT to say?

Because that's insane.  Crazy.  Ridiculous.  Unbelievable.   

(Pardon me while I turn the page in my thesaurus.)

Mind-boggling.  Preposterous.  Absurd.  Bizarre.  Unreasonable.  Foolish.  Unwise.

You see, Coach, this is how it works.  When your offense comes onto the field, it should consist of 11 players total.  Traditionally, that would be five offensive linemen, a couple running backs, a tight end, a pair of wideouts, and yes, ONE quarterback.

Now, I know you came from West Virginia with that funky spread offense, so you're allowed to twist things a little.  Call it five offensive linemen, five receivers, and a quarterback.  Fine by me.

But still, the common denominator here is the "one quarterback" idea.  One at a time.  That's all.  

I mean, sure, you can go all "Philadelphia Eagles" on us and play two at once.  But that's the absolute limit.

Three is just too far.

What's that, you say?  You're not planning to play them at the same time?

Oh, even better.  That makes a lot of sense.   

You're coming off the worst season in Ann Arbor since 1962.  You're a trendy upset pick to lose your first game to Western Michigan.  You're facing a future NFL draft pick in senior Bronco quarterback Tim Hiller.  And you're going to counter that with quarterback-by-committee?

But let me guess--your three options are all better than Hiller, so that's why you haven't been able to narrow it down just yet.  Eventually, though, you're going to settle on one, right?

Or not.

"Maybe we'll have three starting quarterbacks," you told the Associated Press.  "That would be neat."

Great, just great.  Hey, for that matter, why stop with three?

There's four quarters in a game - don't you think you need a different signalcaller for each period?  Maybe four is the perfect number.

There's twelve games in a season - why not try a different player under center for each one?  

An average game has between 60 and 70 offensive snaps.  Why not use a different quarterback on each play?  That should work - keep 35 guys on your roster to cover the other positions and then play 70 quarterbacks on gameday.  Variety is the spice of life, right?

It just doesn't add up, Coach.  You see, your program is supposed to be on the rebound.  That means winning games and having a quarterback/leader/gamechanger that your roster, university, and fan base can rally around.

And you even have decent options.  You've got returning veteran Nick Sheridan.  Not to mention Tate Forcier, who lit up the spring game.  And let's not forget Denard Robinson, who will most likely set a world record for fastest time in untied cleats.

But let's not kid ourselves and pretend all three are created equal.  If you want to beat the Notre Dames and Ohio States of the world, you need a quarterback that can handle the assignment.  So decide already.

We've all heard the infamous saying: "If you have two quarterbacks, you don't have one."  

I think it's safe to extrapolate that idea and surmise that "if you have three quarterbacks, you don't have a prayer."

Get it figured out.

Western is waiting.

Utah Utes v Michigan Wolverines


In other news around the Big Ten today...


Ohio State goes 3-D.  ESPN announced they will produce the Buckeyes/Trojans tilt on September 13th in 3-D at four select theaters.  As if this game wasn't big enough already.

Good news, bad news for Adam Weber.  Minnesota's Weber threw for a pair of touchdowns to star wide receiver Eric Decker in this weekend's stadium-opening scrimmage.  And then there were the three interceptions...

Tyler Moeller's attacker arrested.  The Columbus Dispatch has the details on the felony charge for the man who reportedly punched the OSU linebacker last month.  

Introducing Zach Brown...  We mentioned last week that John Clay might not be the Week One starter at running back for Wisconsin.  Now JSOnline.com is reporting that junior Zach Brown has indeed passed Clay on the depth chart.  Badger fans, what do you think?  Good move?  Or simply a "wait and see" situation?




 

Recommended

[?]

Recent Posts

Subscribe

No Comments

Leave a Comment?

Some HTML is permitted: a, strong, em

What your comment will look like:

said:

what will you say?

Related Topics

Most Active Pages Right Now

ChicagoNow.com on Facebook