Part 3: Specialization in Youth Sports, Good or Bad?

football III.jpg

Finishing up our focus on specialization, another factor that athletes (and their parents) need to keep in mind is that different sports can and do bring different circumstances into the mix.

There are sports that tend to have a genuine overlap between them (more so in some than in others) and because of this overlap they do not require as much specialization. It is almost as if the sports truly complement each other.

Take football and wrestling as one example. I am sure you can find many good football players who are also very good wrestlers, especially in the middle and upper weight classes. In fact, I personally know of two who were solid football players and became state champions in wrestling.

There are other sports that also tend to have similar overlapping characteristics. If size, speed, agility, jumping ability, coordination (hand-eye), etc. are high priorities in a sport, then usually these attributes carry over to another sport that has the same high priority for these athletic skills.

baseball IV.jpg

On the other hand, there are sports, usually ones with an extremely high level of repetition to gain mastery, where overlap of the above-mentioned skills does not have as great an impact.

Sports like gymnastics, figure skating, tennis, and swimming tend to fall in this category.

There are just so many repetitive motions that need to take place, and hours that need to be put in, that without some amount of specialization, reaching any level of mastery is nearly impossible for most.

Think again about that research I mentioned earlier (article #2) on the amount of time and hours an athlete needs to put in to reach expert levels of performance, 10 years or 10,000 hours. That is why you rarely see athletes in these types of sports reaching the highest levels without a certain amount of specialization along the way, and sometimes at a very early age (much earlier than high school).

And lastly there are certainly sports that contain both some overlap and a need for a high level of skill repetition like volleyball, basketball, and soccer. The physical skills mentioned earlier (jumping, running, agility, etc.) definitely have strong overlapping tendencies here; however, so does the amount of repetitive motions that need to occur for gross and fine motor development to take place in order for these athletes to become exceptionally proficient.

Now I am not going to claim myself as an expert in this area and do not want anyone to look at the above divisions as comprehensive in nature. They are just simplified examples to prove a point.

karate.jpg

My purpose here is to demonstrate that overlap in sports is kind of on a continuum, with some sports containing more overlap than others, thus requiring less of a need for specialization. Conversely, the need for mastery in certain other sports lends itself more toward the concept of strong focus in one sport.

However, this does not mean that people should (as many coaches do) use sports that have great overlap as justification that specialization in a sport is wrong and unnecessary, and vice versa using sports that have little overlap for justification that specialization is the only way to go.

This exemplifies the argument that I believe should not be taking place regarding there being only one right or best answer for every athlete when discussing the idea of specialization. I just do not think that that is the best or fairest way to look at this topic.

To do otherwise does not take into account all of the factors that should play such a heavy role in an athlete's decision as to whether they should focus in on only one sport or participate in a variety of sports. It is a personal decision that only they can make and no matter which way they decide, there will be something gained and something lost. 

football III.jpg

That is the nature of choices and decisions; it is a life lesson. So, if the gain is more important than the loss to the individual athlete then, in either scenario, the decision should become easier for them to make.

Notice that very little of my discussion here mentions parents. That is due to my belief that their role is one of guidance only. The concepts of interest, desire, goals, and specialization must come from the athlete themselves. I cannot emphasize this enough.

It is one thing to guide and encourage a young athlete toward their areas of interest and talent, or even hold them to commitments the athlete has made. However, it is quite another to force them to participate, train and/or practice on something they do not show a high level of interest in doing. The latter almost always ends in disaster for both parties.

Oh, and one last thing that needs to be addressed (even if ever so briefly) in relation to the long hours of sports participation many are engaging in today. There is growing evidence that overuse injuries and more severe injuries are certainly on the rise because of how much time athletes are now spending training in their sport or sports.

This particular article was not written with the idea of addressing this issue; however, to not mention a couple of points with regard to this would be inappropriate to say the least.

boxingII.jpg

Whether an athlete chooses to participate in a variety of sports or specialize in one, it is very important that they learn to read the signals their body gives them when they are training/practicing, and that they train with as much emphasis on injury prevention and functional conditioning as they do on their skill development.

This is one area that a parent may need to impose more influence, when necessary.

I know that my own children hated me asking all kinds of questions regarding how they felt physically or encouraging special training to prevent injuries.

When they were injured, even slightly, I would always err on the side of caution. They both, consistently, would tell me, "Dad, I am not a baby" or "wimp." "I am fine and am able to play."

As a coach I was a stickler for never placing winning above the safety of my athletes, and I was even worse with my own kids. I consistently tried to keep a long-term view of things and firmly believe that this is in the best interest of all athletes at all levels.

basketball II.jpg

Hopefully, the information I have presented helps to clarify this current and continuing dilemma many young athletes are facing today, making it easier for those involved to make an informed decision.

In conclusion, I would like to leave you with a quote that no matter what path an athlete chooses to take, it will always hold relevance and meaning for them as they move forward through their athletic experiences.

"Extrinsic goals are achieved with greater efficiency and with greater reward (satisfaction) when intrinsic objectives are consistently held in the highest priority."

Comments

Leave a comment
  • Very insightful; This entry is featured on today's "Hot on ChicagoNow:"
    http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/hot-on-chicagonow/2010/05/hot-on-chicagonow-may-17-2010.html

  • In reply to laurenstrec:

    Great!!! Thanks for the mention. You think this one was good wait untill you read about the track athlete from California who won the conference for her team. Oops, nope she didn't - got disqualified by the opposing teams coach after he reported her. And you are not going to believe what for.

    Have to wait till Wednesday, BUT DON'T MISS IT!!!

Leave a comment