Veterinary Visits on the Decline, Our Pets Suffer

Veterinary Visits on the Decline, Our Pets Suffer

My biggest wish for the New Year is that you will keep your pets healthy.

You'd think every pet owner would comply, but the fact is there's been a steady decline in veterinary visits over the past decade, and our pets' health is suffering.

Totally preventable problems are on the rise. As one example, according to Banfield Pet Hospitals State of Pet Health 2011 report, internal parasites are up 13 percent in cats, and 30 percent in dogs since 2006.

Also, just as with people, discovering illness in pets early can sometimes spell the difference between life and death. Owners might say, "Well, I know when my pet is sick." However, this isn't always the case, especially for cats, who are skilled at masking illness. A veterinarian may detect problems you cannot.

When a problem is discovered early and treatment is prompt, the outcome may be more favorable. For example, some types of cancers in pets can sometimes be cured. Early diagnosis can also mean less suffering or pain for our pets -- and less pain for our checkbooks. For example, discovered early, mast cell cancer in dogs may not require radiation treatment.

Other problems, such as diabetes in cats, can sometimes be avoided all together. If your cat is overweight, helping the pet shave off pounds might mean avoiding diabetes. Sadly, diabetes is on the rise in cats, up 16 percent since 2006, according to the Banfield report.

There are many reasons for the decline in vet visits. I don't deny that in some cases veterinarians are to blame, pushing clients away with high fees, or "nickel and diming' their clients. Overall, however, veterinary medicine remains a relative bargain.

Consider that a knee replacement for a dog might cost a few thousand dollars, while in human medicine, a similar procedure would cost 10 times that amount. The difference is that in human medicine, for the most part, insurance or government aid cover the cost. In veterinary medicine, you must pay up unless you have pet insurance, which I believe is a great safety net.

Also, we need more emphasis on preventative care. Historically, such care for pets has been downplayed in favor of vaccines. However, over the past decade, there's been less need for many vaccines, leading too many owners to skip veterinary visits, thinking there's little need to go.

In addition, while veterinarians remain among the most trusted of professionals, we live in an increasingly cynical society. Clients today are less likely to instantly accept a veterinarian's recommended course of treatment. Owners often seek out a "second opinion." They may consult an alternative veterinarian (which is just fine), but increasingly they're visiting "Dr. Google."

According to the Bayer Veterinary Care Usage Study (surveying pet owners and veterinary professionals about their views on veterinary medicine and pet health), 15 percent of owners said that by using the Internet, they believe they have less need to visit veterinarians.

Sometimes websites are credible sources of background information, but a surprising number of pet owners read blogs written by non-experts, and accept whatever advice they read online as gospel.

I've been horrified by the trend, which I began to see about five years ago, when readers began writing me asking how to "avoid the veterinarian." This is entirely contradictory to what I believe is in the best interest of our pets.

I welcome your comments and ideas on both sides of the fence. Email Not only will I be writing about the decline in veterinary visits, but I'll also offer your perspectives on the topic as I write for professional publications and speak at veterinary conferences in 2012 and beyond. I hope to be a part of the solution.

©Steve Dale, Tribune Media Services



Leave a comment
  • Then there was the story yesterday about a dog swallowing a spoon, costing the owner $2500.00 to have it extricated, as well as the dog the hair around his belly.

  • Well not sure how to answer that....don't know where this happened, and first - I hope the dog is okay now. If a similar surgery was done for a person, an obstruction of some kind (yes, there are more people involved in surgeries for people, sometimes)....the cost would be 10X that. Maybe even more....Sure, $2,500 is a lot of money.

    And maybe, as I wrote - this is where pet insurance comes in....Then the story I wrote isn't really about's about preventative care - which doesn't cost $2,500, and may save a pet's life.

  • In reply to Steve Dale:

    Was in Maryland. I saw it on local TV news, but one source closer to the matter is here.

    As far as it goes, Pooch Cafe (available on had a series starting 1/4/2012 on Poncho having to change his name because he was no longer eligible for pet insurance.

  • fb_avatar

    I don't find this that surprising. The economy is at a standstill - many people can't afford routine medical care for themselves, much less for their pets. Yet veterinary costs continue to skyrocket. A routine visit for vaccinations, heartworm treatment and testing and flea treatments is probably close to $200 everywhere in the country.

    It's harsh to say that people that can't afford veterinary care shouldn't have pets, but that's actually the reality. What's unfortunate is the percentage of people that currently includes.

  • fb_avatar

    Many people think the pets dont need to be taken care, but the fact is we need to take care of them too, we need to make sure the pets are properly groomed as per the requirements because grooming is most important part of the pet keeping, it no

  • In reply to petwe Met:

    Anne - my gosh, I never said that people who can't afford care shouldn't have pets. I would never say that....And Petwe Met, I agree....

    Thanks both for your comments

  • My thoughts:I think it's important to have a vet that you trust. That means making an effort to establish a good rapport. Listen to what they say and ask questions. "Dr.Google" can be a good source for formulating those questions, even if it is useless as a diagnostic tool.

  • I agree - thank you harpercollie

Leave a comment