Only 229 Days Left For 100 Watt Light Bulbs

Only 229 Days Left For 100 Watt Light Bulbs
Thumbnail image for light bulb.gif

Are you aware that you only have 229 days left to legally buy 100 watt incandescent light bulbs in the US? It's the result of a law passed by congress to encourage energy efficiency. And by 2014 you won't be able to buy any incandescent light bulbs 40 watts and above. Once that happens you are really going to have problems. Don't worry you will have many alternatives.

For instance, you can start hoarding incandescent light bulbs before the law goes into effect. I'm sure retailers will be doing a brisk business in these light bulbs for the next few months. They might even make great Christmas presents or even closing gifts. But how many years' supply of light bulbs can you buy and store?

I'm also assuming that a thriving black market will develop in incandescent light bulbs. I'm sure that some Al Capone equivalent is already planning his/her empire.

You can also use compact fluorescent light bulbs. They seem to have a pretty good cost/energy savings tradeoff. I just wish they would last 7 years like advertised. I'm getting more like 1 year. The only problem is that they won't work in light fixtures designed specifically for incandescent light bulbs. And then there is the slight problem with the mercury pollution. It's only a matter of time before congress bans these too. (BTW, I've been on many showings where the sellers have installed terrible fluorescent light bulbs in ceiling fixtures and it makes the rooms look like a morgue. DO NOT DO THIS WHEN SELLING A HOME.)

Of course, the holy grail is the LED light bulb. Two manufacturers are showcasing their prototypes of a 100 watt equinvalent LED light bulb this week. There are only a few problems though:

  • They won't be ready in time to replace the banned 100 watt incandescent light bulbs. It's not clear how much of a delay there will be.
  • They're going to cost about $50 each. So we will consume $50 in resources every ___ years to save _____ in resources. Yeah, I'd like to see that math.
  • People are going to have to change out a bunch of light fixtures. Better consider that as you are shopping for a new home. All that really cool lighting...what will you have to replace it with? And what will be the environmental impact of replacing millions of light fixtures?

Eventually builders and architects will start to come up with some really neat LED based lighting solutions but we're not there yet.

I understand the intent of this law but what congress apparently doesn't understand is that the market can allocate resources much more effectively than they can. If it made sense for people to replace incandescent light bulbs with something else they'd be doing it. It's certainly working with compact fluorescents, though we have to address the whole mercury problem.

Personally, I suspect that congress will eventually realize they need to extend the deadline on this really dumb law. Just wait until they incur the wrath of people who begin to realize the implications of this law. In the meantime, I think I need to create a new category for really dumb laws. There sure seems to be enough of them.

Comments

Leave a comment
  • But LEDs (like CFLs before them) have recently been found to have serious home breakage and disposal concerns,
    having lead, arsenic and toxic vapor content, according to University of California (Davis and Irvine) research
    http://ceolas.net/#li20ledx

    They suggest wearing safety protection when breakage occurs and that the bulbs should be recycled.
    They also maintain that there was insufficient product testing before
    LED bulbs came onto the market. There was a law that was supposed to take effect on January 1 that would have mandated such testing, but it was opposed and blocked by industry groups, and has been put on hold...

  • PS
    Agree that the light bulb ban does not make any sense
    - not just re choice,
    not just re usage safety,
    not just re there not being an electricity shortage for paying customers (and even less so in the future, with all the renewable and low emission alternatives)

    - but also the overall society energy savings are small, less than 1%, as from US Dept of Energy own figures:
    http://ceolas.net/#li171x

    Besides, notice how light bulb manufacturers have pushed for and welcomed this ban on cheap unprofitable light bulbs, as also covered on the site with documentation and references.

  • Thanks for the additional insights. Does not surprise me one bit.

  • Thanks Gary

  • I present The Quick Glance Guide to Global Warming:

    Astronauts: http://oi52.tinypic.com/vwzel5.jpg
    Ocean: http://oi53.tinypic.com/35b9g08.jpg
    Thermometers: http://oi52.tinypic.com/2agnous.jpg
    Ice: http://oi52.tinypic.com/2upvlvm.jpg
    Earth: http://i49.tinypic.com/2mpg0tz.jpg
    Prophet: http://oi53.tinypic.com/b54in8.jpg
    Psychopaths: http://oi51.tinypic.com/2po8tas.jpg
    Thinker: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n92YenWfz0Y

Leave a comment