Teachers May Still Get Extra Pay

The sad story of the 2010 federal TIF application took another step forward last week when CTU issued a press release announcing the fact that CPS has been asked to give back $34 million and calling for an investigation of the funds that have already been used. It was an obvious attempt to embarrass CPS and avoid being blamed for not letting Chicago teachers pocket the merit pay from Washington.  However, I'm not sure it was entirely successful.  Teachers may still get the extra cash from Washington, and these "sky is falling" press releases sure lose their effectiveness pretty quickly.  (Then again, at least I'm still on the CTU press release list.)

As you may recall from last week, CTU got out a quick press release calling for an investigation of CPS's use of the contentious federal TIF grant from Washington.  "The controversial grant proposal was submitted during the leadership transition shortly after Lewis and others were elected to office in June 2010. Upon review of the proposal, CTU decided it was not interested in the pilot project because it was deemed a merit pay study and several merit pay studies have already concluded that merit pay does not work."

NBC went with the CTU version of events (CPS to Return Nearly $35M Federal Grant), but then on Friday the Tribune gave a somewhat more full account of events (CPS stands to lose $34 million federal grant to pilot merit pay scheme at 25 school)  and informed us that CPS may in the end be allowed to use the money in some other way, and on Monday afternoon, CPS chief Brizard weighed in with his version of the story: "The unwillingness of the CTU’s leadership to partner with us will force the district to return the $34 million, and teachers will miss an opportunity to benefit from additional support and compensation for the amazing work they do every day in support of our students."

[On Monday we also  learned that the Youth Connections teachers weren't all going to be fired and the school closed after all, another tempest in a teapot set off by CTU (and its sidekick, ChicagoACTS). ]

See below for full statements from CPS and CTU:

CTU PRESS RELEASE

BREAKING NEWS

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                                                   

May 31, 2012                                                        

CTU President calls for inspector general investigation into CPS’ fraudulent use of $35 million federal grant

CHICAGO – Today, Chicago Teachers Union (CTU) President Karen GJ Lewis, NBCT, asked the inspector general of the Chicago Public Schools (CPS) to investigate why district officials accepted a $35 million grant two years ago requiring Union collaboration it did not receive.  CTU objected to the Teacher Incentive Fund (TIF) proposal because its members are opposed to merit pay schemes that would link their salaries to standardized test scores and other value-added experiments.

The controversial grant proposal was submitted during the leadership transition shortly after Lewis and others were elected to office in June 2010. Upon review of the proposal, CTU decided it was not interested in the pilot project because it was deemed a merit pay study and several merit pay studies have already concluded that merit pay does not work.  In early March of this year, Lewis received a phone call from U.S. Education Department (DOE) official Jo Anderson inquiring about the TIFgrant.  He (Anderson) was surprised to learn CPS and CTU had never agreed upon collaboration.

On March 9th,  19th,  and 20th CTU repeatedly requested copies of all documents and correspondence given to the DOE regarding the TIF grant. It received none. On May 30th, Lewis learned from  CPS officials that the district had been asked to return the federal dollars it had fraudulently received.

In an email today to CPS Chief Talent Officer Alicia Winkler, who oversaw the project, Lewis once again reiterated her objections to the TIFproposal upon learning CPS was aggressively pitching local reporters a misleading story suggesting she had somehow “caused the district to ‘lose millions of dollars.”’:

“Today I received several phone calls from reporters alleging that CPS is pitching a story about my involvement with the TIFgrant,” Lewis wrote. “I am disheartened that CPS chose to go public with this matter, but since you have decided to be extremely disingenuous let us recap the entirety of this issue.  This letter does not reflect the depth and breadth of our conversations.  You knew when you submitted this grant in 2010, the newly-elected leadership of CTU was philosophically opposed to merit pay, performance pay or whatever euphemism currently in use.

“You knew when you accepted the first federal dollar that your actions were in violation of the terms of the grant, which was supposed to include Union "buy-in.” You asked for a last-minute discussion about the grant, yet you refused to provide the Unionwith your correspondence with the DOE since 2010.  In essence, this entire discussion, prompted by a deadline, has been dealt with like so many other initiatives in your department - throw something together, slapdash and hope no one notices that it is a train wreck. We are serious about planning, while you want us to sign off on a plan that is not reflective of the written grant because you spent money to which you were not entitled.  This letter is a bold attempt to shift responsibility from you to us.  That is unacceptable,” she concluded.

 

Later, Lewis contacted Inspector General James M. Sullivan, and called for a formal investigation into Winkler’s actions.  She wrote:

 

“CPS Chief Talent Officer Alicia Winkler accepted a $35 million dollar Teacher Incentive Fund grant from the US Department of Education in 2010.  The terms of the grant included Unionagreement and participation in a merit pay, differentiated pay, and performance pay scheme. Ms. Winkler accepted federal funds knowing she was in violation of the terms of the grant as the Union did not agree to participate.  On May 30, 2012 I was notified by Ms. Winkler that CPS was forced to return the remaining $34 million.  These monies should have never been accepted in the first place, given CPS had prior knowledge that the Chicago Teachers Union would not be party to a divisive pilot program that has been shown to be unsuccessful for over 100 years of previous research.  This misuse of taxpayer funds is extremely regrettable in light of the fiscal neglect of our schools.  I respectfully ask you to launch a full investigation into the fraudulent actions by CPS immediately.  I will also request the US DOE to look into this matter. “

 

###

JCB Commentary from weekly newsletter:

"I’m particularly disappointed that we are forced to return $34 million to the Department of Education because the CTU has refused to work with us to support and reward our teachers for the good work they are doing in our schools. The grant awarded to CPS through the federal Teacher Incentive Fund Program provided the perfect opportunity for the CTU and CPS to work together to better support and compensate our teachers by linking career ladders, professional development opportunities and differentiated compensation in an environment in which teachers would only experience a positive impact at absolutely no cost. Instead, the unwillingness of the CTU’s leadership to partner with us will force the district to return the $34 million, and teachers will miss an opportunity to benefit from additional support and compensation for the amazing work they do every day in support of our students."

Advertisement:

Comments

Leave a comment
  • Russo, Surely you jest! Russo the Corporate privatization Lap Dog! Silly and sad!

  • Alex, I think you have lost your way. Winckler illegally uses federal dollars after the CTU said they didn't want to participate. All the while telling the FEDS they will strong arm, err get, cooperation from CTU. Becky Carroll tries to cover up the illegal activity by blaming the CTU. Russo then backs up Carroll. This sounds like a cabal.

  • Waste fraud and mismanagement IG? Will you treat this like you did Crawley's residency?--wait a year before you say anything. Are their dead fish on your desks?

  • Speaking of odious . . . it's the Karen Lewis PR machine. . .I swear she's got a staff of three just dedicated to commenting here and defaming people with lies. . . while she's off aping the lispers and stutterers . . .

    Good God teachers . . . are you effing kidding the rest of us with this crap. . . if this is how public school teachers' leaders behave, we should end it now and privatize the who damn thing. Vouchers for all public school students -- now. End this disgusting trainwreck of a system.

  • In reply to district299reader:

    Not a staff of 3, Karen Lewis has 25,000 active teachers standing behind her. We may even be pushing her in front of us.

    Are you Becky Carrol?

    Stand Strong CTU

    Vote YES

  • In reply to BillyTurtle:

    The bottom up democratic model of CTU ensures I vote with my union CTU. Vote Yes to Strike Authorization!

  • fb_avatar
    In reply to district299reader:

    A staff of "3"? When you add up all of the money being spent just to attack teachers, we are talking about dozens of paid staffers and millions upon millions of dollars coming out of taxpayer or tax waived monies.

    Don't be fooled by this propaganda! Vote Yes!

  • Without evidence, qualitative research, or data, to back their arguments, hmmmm sorry, the trolls just make dumb statements. CPS has an army of 28 spewing lies, and the same darn lies over and over again. Ask these trolls for hard evidence/ data and they change the subject! Why! Vote YES to strike authorization!

Leave a comment