Someone checked out 400 scientific papers (really?) and concluded that challenge the scientific "consensus" that climate change (no longer called global warming) is fueled my manmade CO2 emissions.
If you can plow through all this science, please let me know. I admit that 400 papers is a lot more than I can handle. I make no claim about their accuracy.
No doubt, global warming proponents will claim that the work is misrepresented, doesn't reach that conclusion, is methodologically deficient and so forth. As they should, just as scientists have an obligation to fly speck any so-called scientific consensus. Save me the responses that try to discredit the findings by discrediting the sources. If that's fair game, then the studies funded by the "green" government also should be challenged.
But please don't pull that "consensus" baloney again.