The fatal shooting of Harambe, the 17-year-od western lowland gorilla in the Cincinnati Zoo who was using a 4-year-old boy as a plaything, has spawned a disgusting swarm of second-guessers..
"They should have shot the mother instead," columnist Heidi Stevens reported spotting on Twitter. She observed that more than 400,000 have signed a Change.org petition calling for the zoo, Child Protective Services and the Cincinnati Police Department to hold the child's parents responsible for Harambe's death." Never mind that 400,000 blockheads don't have all the facts yet.
Over on Facebook, this turned up:
Brandi Wall: I say another parent loses a kid that results in an animals (sic) death should have to serve out the rest of their (sic) days wearing a costume and caged in said animals (sic) place. ie, that dumbshit whose kid fell in with gorilla. Suit up bitch, time to sweat your life away as a gorilla!
But when it comes to choosing between the life of a gorilla or a child, it's fair to ask: Whose life is more important? Of course the gorilla had to be shot before he could have killed or maimed the child. It's stunning that some folks seem to believe the gorilla should come first.
About the mother? God, folks, she nearly lost a kid. Did she do wrong? Let's wait to learn the facts, can we?
Read why Americans need to learn about the nation's most ignored war.
Find out what freelance editorial services I can provide for you.
Want to be notified by email when I post? Type your email address in the box and click the "create subscription" button. My list is completely spam free, and you can opt out at any time.