UPATE: 12 important, unanswered questions about Iran's hijacking of two U.S. Navy riverine boats in the Persian Gulf

UPDATE: One explanation was that there was a GPS problem that lead to a navigation error that brought the two boats into Iranian waters. I don't know; that doesn't sound realistic to me. 

As a former U.S. Navy officer, I have to demur from the Obama administration's self-congratulations for peacefully "resolving" the capture and imprisonment of 10 sailors who were manning the two  riverine command boats in the Persian Gulf.

Major questions remain about force protection, international law and sovereignty.

  1. How did the Iranians capture the boats? By force of arms, threat of attack? Is that a violation of U.S. sovereignty, no matter where the boats were.
  2. Did the boats "wander" off course because of mechanical problems, or were they on a spy mission near the Iranian naval base on Farsi Island? Did the sailors make a basic mistake in navigation?
  3. If the cause was a mechanical problem, what exactly was it and and how are they being addressed to avoid possible future engagements.
  4. Were the boats actually in international waters when they were captured? If they were in Iranian waters, how far off Farsi Island does Iran claim that their territorial waters extend? Three miles? Twelve miles? Twenty miles? Are those waters claimed as Iranian territory actually recognized as such by the international community?
  5. Did the Iranians violate the Geneva Convention or international law by showing pictures of the American captives? Did the Iranians violate international law or the Convention by  requiring a sailor to "apologize" on camera? Did the sailors violate regulations by giving more than their names and serial numbers?
  6. Did the American sailors destroy classified equipment and documents as required by regulations before their capture?
  7. What dd the Iranians learn about U.S. military secrets in their inspection of the boats?
  8. Were the boats returned to the Americans with everything intact?
  9. Should the boats' commander have resisted the capture? (I'm not judging; I never faced a gun in my face.)
  10. How did U.S. "lose contact" with the boats? Wasn't the radar on nearby ships working. Did the boats inform higher command that they were having mechanical? That they were about to be boarded by hostile forces?
  11. Were  the boats adequately protected by companion U.S. forces? Did they attempt to inject themselves when the Iranian boats were approaching the U.S. boats? Were U.S. forces ordered not to intervene?
  12. What, if anything, did Sec. of State John Kerry deal away in order to secure the return of the sailors?

These and other questions obviously will be asked by a Naval board of inquiry and other authorities in the military chain of command. These are not insignificant questions that can be brushed aside by administration apologists. The incident goes to the heart of questions about the Obama's commitment to national security, including whether it is fully determined to protecting its military personnel. We can only hope that our representatives in Congress ask such questions. And make the answers public because Americans have a right to know. I'm not confident that the media will ask such questions, either because of bias, disinterest or  incompetence. (How many journalists have actually served in the military and would think about asking such questions?)

In the face of needed answers, we get this unintelligible babbling from Vice President Joe Bidden. As the Tribune reported  he told CBS:

...the U.S. government had not issued an apology. “There’s nothing to apologize for,” Biden said. “When you have a problem with the boat, you apologize the boat had a problem? No, and there was no looking for any apology. This was just standard nautical practice."

It's not standard "nautical practice" and, Joe, can't you get your stories straight?

Remember the USS Pueblo

The Pueblo (AGER-2) is a U.S. Navy intelligence ship that was attacked and captured by North Korea on Jan. 23, 1968. One U.S. crewman was killed and 82 others were captured. They were held and tortured for 11 months, before being released. North Korea claimed that the ship had violated its territorial waters while the United States asserted that it was in international waters.  The Pueblo  still is held by North Korea today and it officially remains a U.S. Navy commissioned ship.

For those of us of a certain age, the images of the U.S. sailors kneeing under guard on the riverine boats conjured up angry memories of the humiliation that we all felt from the Pueblo boarding. Let it never happen again, was the cry.

Indeed. There was anger because the Navy had doing little or nothing to protect the Pueblo. I know because I was is the Navy then. My ship, a destroyer based on the East Coast, was ordered after the Pueblo hijacking to sail to Cuba where a sister intelligence gathering ship was doing the same in Havana Harbor. For three weeks we slowly sailed back and forth, mimicking the spy ship's movements as a deterrent against the Cubans reenacting the Pueblo assault.

But now, with the riverine hijacking there's no public outcry, no administration or Pentagon promise that they'd never let this happen again. Sad. It appears that the riverine crew and other deployed military personnel are on their own. Unless, like Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl you desert your comrades and Obama comes to your aid by swapping five known and detained Islamic terrorists to get your sorry ass back.

Read why Americans need to learn about the nation's most ignored war. 

Find out what freelance editorial services I can provide for you.

Want to be notified by email when I post? Type your email address in the box and click the "create subscription" button. My list is completely spam free, and you can opt out at any time.

Comments

Leave a comment
  • I agree with you that this should be investigated and a Naval board of inquiry will almost certainly be appointed. Perhaps, given your experience as a naval officer and knowledge of international laws of warfare, you could volunteer to serve.

    Meanwhile, the fact that all of the service members and the two small boats were released within 24 hours is in major contrast with the USS Pueblo incident. It demonstrates just how much better it is for the members of our armed forces who fall into the hands of foreign military forces if there are some diplomatic ties with that foreign nation. There were none with North Korea; there are with Iran, even if very cool.

  • As I asked, do you know what went on in those "negotiations" with Iran? Reminds me of the back-door, secret promises made by Reagon that led to the Iran-contra deal.

  • In reply to Dennis Byrne:

    No I don't. Neither do you. But, I am sure there are ten sailors who are happy we could at least talk to Iran.

  • In reply to jnorto:

    I readily admitted that I didn't have the answers, but would like to see the answers to the questions that I raised. That's why I asked them. Yes, I'm happy that we could talk to Iran, or whatever it would have taken, to get the sailors released. Yes, the administration took credit for the nuke deal and the "relationship" it established with belligerent Iran, and that's good--if you can believe an administration that is the least transparent in memory and is so disconnected from reality (read the SOTU speech) that it has lost so much trust of the American people.

  • How would you feel about an Iranian patrol boat off Long Island?

  • In reply to Aquinas wired:

    If they are in their territorial waters like we allegedly were in Iran's, they we should detain it. Reread my questions; notice that the problem wasn't with the taking but with our own procedures involving the boat. It also was with Iran's use of the crew's photos for propaganda purposes.

Leave a comment

  • Advertisement:
  • Advertisement:
  • ChicagoNow is full of win

    Welcome to ChicagoNow.

    Meet our bloggers,
    post comments, or
    pitch your blog idea.

  • Visit my new website

    I'm a freelance writer, editor and author. I can help you with a wide variety of projects. Check out my new website at www.dennisbyrne.net

  • Subscribe to The Barbershop

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

  • Dennis Byrne’s Facebook Fan Page

  • Like me on Facebook

  • Our National Debt

  • Twitter

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • It was pointed out that in 1968, the Hong Kong flu killed over 100,000 in the US and over a…
      Read the story | Reply to this comment
    • After 20 years of science courses and 40 years of practice, I can tell you the “science” always changes and…
      Read the story | Reply to this comment
    • Yes Dennis! and if you weren't retired this would have appeared in the back of the obituaries, probably in Braille.…
      Read the story | Reply to this comment
    • But don't our doctors and nurses follow the science? And if we don't follow the science, what does that leave…
      Read the story | Reply to this comment
    • Thanks for sharing this wonderful information lowes employee portal
      Read the story | Reply to this comment
  • /Users/dennisby/Desktop/trailer.mp4
  • Advertisement: