When it comes to climate change, it's scientific evidence, not consensus, that counts

This is a must read for those who follow the crowd (i.e. politicians, professional leftist and environmental elitists) who cling to the notion that because there's "scientific consensus" that mankind is changing the climate that it must be so.

Last week a friend chided me for not agreeing with the scientific consensus that climate change is likely to be dangerous. I responded that, according to polls, the "consensus" about climate change only extends to the propositions that it has been happening and is partly man-made, both of which I readily agree with. Forecasts show huge uncertainty.

Besides, science does not respect consensus. There was once widespread agreement about phlogiston (a nonexistent element said to be a crucial part of combustion), eugenics, the impossibility of continental drift, the idea that genes were made of protein (not DNA) and stomach ulcers were caused by stress, and so forth—all of which proved false. Science, Richard Feyman once said, is "the belief in the ignorance of experts.

My friend objected that I seemed to follow the herd on matters like the reality of evolution and the safety of genetically modified crops, so why not on climate change? Ah, said I, but I don't. I agree with the majority view on evolution, not because it is a majority view but because I have looked at evidence. It's the data that convince me, not the existence of a consensus.

Read more

 

Comments

Leave a comment
  • fb_avatar

    While I respect and appreciate this man and his ideas, who can argue we are polluting and destroying our planet in unsustainable ways. I do not need scientists to tell me this.

  • Ridley is not a denier. He accepts that CO2 is raising the Earth's temperature but not to a dangerous degree. At least, he thinks the evidence so far is not conclusive. I respect his scientific integrity and openness to further study and debate.

  • Me, too.

Leave a comment

  • ChicagoNow is full of win

    Welcome to ChicagoNow.

    Meet our bloggers,
    post comments, or
    pitch your blog idea.

  • Advertisement:
  • Subscribe to The Barbershop

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

  • Dennis Byrne’s Facebook Fan Page

  • Like me on Facebook

  • Meet The Blogger

    Dennis Byrne

    Chicago Tribune contributing op-ed columnist and author of forthcoming historical novel, "Madness: The War of 1812." Reporter, editor and columnist for Chicago Sun-Times and Chicago Daily News. Freelance writer and editor.

  • Our National Debt

  • Twitter

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • In reply to Dennis Byrne:
      That is the article I read this morning when I said the L.A. Times agrees with you. The article ...
      Read the story | Reply to this comment
    • In reply to Dennis Byrne:
      Yes, I would prefer to repeal the 22d Amendment. It was passed to prevent future presidents from following the ...
      Read the story | Reply to this comment
    • In reply to Dennis Byrne:
      I would criticize Notre Dame for its decision, but I would respect its right as a private entity to invite ...
      Read the story | Reply to this comment
    • I recommend Robin Abcarian's opinion piece in the L.A. Times: http://www.latimes.com/local/abcarian/la-me-ra-brandeis-muslim-students-nixed-ayaan-hirsi-ali-a-loss-for-them-20140411,0,7940815.story#axzz2yyANwbR8 Once you read it, you'll see the serious flaws in logic ...
      Read the story | Reply to this comment
    • In reply to jnorto:
      I'm not a big fan of term limits. But do you mean that you would repeal the 22nd amendment that ...
      Read the story | Reply to this comment
  • Monthly Archives

  • /Users/dennisby/Desktop/trailer.mp4
  • Advertisement:
  • Today's Flyers

    Flyer alerts and shopping advice from InsideShopper.com