Folks in the ChicagoNow blog community recently discussed how you handle insulting, irrational and personal attacks for something that you have posted. Here's a sample: In my regular Tuesday Chicago Tribune column today, I wrote about the consequences of the Supreme Court adopting the "equality" argument in the same-sex debate. My e-mail folder filled with some interesting responses. I haven't used full names, just in case someone was sending out fake, embarrassing messages in their names.
You are a moron!!!!! -- A.S.
If, as you theorize in your Tribune column today, social utility trumps equality, then might I suggest the Federal Government implement mandatory euthanasia of grumpy old jerks like yourself. Social Security and Medicare would stay solvent for a longer period of time, plus, public discourse would be elevated if the type of whiny, curmudgeonly kvetching you try to pass off as "punditry" abruptly disappeared. Win-win, I say. -- P.M.
You really never cease to amaze with the lack of insight and real idiocy of your articles. Please stop. -- D.B.
Dennis – According to your argument, I should not feel so human because people of African ancestry were given the right to vote, and own land, and go to school, and marry - God forbid – Caucasian people. I don’t feel any less human because of that. I don’t feel any less married because people of the same sex are married. I don’t feel any less political because you have these right wing feelings about things. I don’t feel any less religious because of the religion you profess to think is the correct way to believe. These same sex people don’t affect you in any other way than an affront to your arrogant manner. I actually feel sorry for you, for your hatred for people who don’t believe as you do. A major problem in this country is the disrespect you hold for people who are not same thinkers with you. -- T.S.
Concerning your article, do you think it is intelligent to let that much stupidity out in one breath? You're argument is old and tired and the institution of marriage was sullied long before DOMA was struck down. Don't see you out their writing about drunken idiots running off to Vegas to get married by Elvis and the soaring divorce rate. Gays want the same rights as guaranteed by the constitution and it takes nothing away from others. Marriage is a legal contract or a spiritual one as well if you so choose.
The GOP will not see the White House in the next election because of their policies of exclusion, sexism, racism and homophobia. Bet you wouldn't have to dig far to find the gays in yours and anyone else's family. Funny how you change your vantage point when you do. You use the same arguments they used when trying to integrate the Army under Truman. If blacks serve with whites then........blah, blah blah. You also forget that some of the most decorated service people have been gay and they are willing to lay their lives down yet they don't share in the rights. -- B.M.
Tim Heitman · Top Commenter · Chicago, IllinoisThe sky is falling! The sky is falling! The sky is falling! Put the queers back in the closet!You know what, Dennis? Despite your fear mongering, we'll survive plural marriage just fine, should it become reality. After all, plural marriages have been around for thousands of years.
Allan Benson · Follow · Top Commenter · Southern Illinois University Carbondale
John Petergal · Top Commenter · Illinois Institute of TechnologyMr. Byrne, Please tell me how your marriage or your life will come to irreparable harm if the gay couple next door to you (and there is a couple next door, or two doors down) is allowed to get married? We've heard the arguments you admit are tired, and then go on to make anyway. Polygamy in the United States is widely practiced, while illegal. And in Utah, many law enforcement officials refuse to prosecute its practice, or even practice it themselves.And if your neighbor wants to marry his horse, or his car, how is it your business anyway? Are you afraid the horse will ask for relief from the estate tax?Remember your conservative mantra: smaller government?
Rico Muscatel · Follow · Top Commenter · Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
Frank Cardinalli · Top Commenter · San Francisco State UniversityDennis Bryne: What in the hell is your problem? Marriage is open in most states EXCLUSIVELY to.
heterosexuals. The bans against polygamy are INCLUSIVE to both heterosexual people and homosexual.
people alike. Capisce? What homosexual people want is to have the same RIGHTS as other people. We
are looking for INCLUSION, not to create the kinds of red herrings you are using to confuse this basic.
and fundamental demand. Americas idiotic 40 culture war is coming rapidly to an end from this point forward.
so get lost. You insult my intelligence.