Not that who says what matters all that much. But it's interesting that this prominent scientist, Freeman John Dyson, explains why skepticism is a key component of science, not a sign of ignorance, as climate change alarmist have it. As reported in the New Jersey Times:
Freeman Dyson is a physicist who has been teaching at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton since Albert Einstein was there. When Einstein died in 1955, there was an opening for the title of "most brilliant physicist on the planet." Dyson has filled it.
So when the global-warming movement came along, a lot of people wondered why he didn’t come along with it. The reason he’s a skeptic is simple, the 89-year-old Dyson said when I phoned him.
"I think any good scientist ought to be a skeptic," Dyson said.
He finds "fudge factors" in the apocalyptic predictions:
"I just think they don’t understand the climate," he said of climatologists. "Their computer models are full of fudge factors."
A major fudge factor concerns the role of clouds. The greenhouse effect of carbon dioxide on its own is limited. To get to the apocalyptic projections trumpeted by Al Gore and company, the models have to include assumptions that CO-2 will cause clouds to form in a way that produces more warming.
"The models are extremely oversimplified," he said. "They don't represent the clouds in detail at all. They simply use a fudge factor to represent the clouds."
The response from the alarmists is the usual: "He's in denial."
Type your email address in the box and click the "create subscription" button. My list is completely spam free, and you can opt out at any time.