Why a $4 trillion deficit reduction would be easier than $1.2 trillion

The idea is certainly counterintuitive, but it's a serious proposal from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. This is the group's explanation:

... a Go Big approach [$4 trillion] is not just what is needed to get control of the debt from a policy perspective, a comprehensive approach can also improve the chances of success from three main factors:

• Political Trade-Offs. Putting everything on the table, especially the drivers of future debt, would allow the political trade-offs necessary to tackle entitlement and tax reforms to be considered.

• Shared Sacrifice. A comprehensive approach would promote a sense of shared contributions, improving political support while reducing push-back from constituencies and interest groups who would otherwise feel singled out.

• Economic and Political Gains of Debt Reduction. Stabilizing the debt would boost confidence, strengthen the economy over the longer-term, provide greater certainty and an improved business environment, and

That last point is especially important. Such a comprehensive approach would go a long way to relieve the uncertainty that is currently holding an economic recovery back. I believe there would be an explosion of hiring and growth.

Leave a comment

  • Advertisement:
  • Advertisement:
  • ChicagoNow is full of win

    Welcome to ChicagoNow.

    Meet our bloggers,
    post comments, or
    pitch your blog idea.

  • Visit my new website

    I'm a freelance writer, editor and author. I can help you with a wide variety of projects. Check out my new website at www.dennisbyrne.net

  • Subscribe to The Barbershop

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

  • Dennis Byrne’s Facebook Fan Page

  • Like me on Facebook

  • Our National Debt

  • Twitter

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

  • /Users/dennisby/Desktop/trailer.mp4
  • Latest on ChicagoNow

  • Advertisement: