Public's view of "high-speed" rail: snore

The public's view of the highly touted, outrageously expensive and totally cost-ineffective "high-speed" rail is as passionate as President Barack Obama, environmentalists and assorted ideologues want us to believe.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that, overall, 41% of Likely Voters favor the plan and 46% are opposed. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

But when you break down the numbers, what emerges that most of its backing comes from the "political class," a slice of Americans that look to government for most of its answers. Said Rasmussen:

By a 57% to 28% margin, voters believe that cutting government spending would do more to create jobs than building a high-speed rail network.

As on many issues, there is a wide gap between the views of the Political Class  and Mainstream voters. By a 58% to 13% margin, the Political Class believes a high-speed rail system would do more to create jobs. However, by a 68% to 20% margin, Mainstream voters believe that cutting government spending is the better path to job creation.

 

Leave a comment

  • ChicagoNow is full of win

    Welcome to ChicagoNow.

    Meet our bloggers,
    post comments, or
    pitch your blog idea.

  • Advertisement:
  • Visit my new website

    I'm a freelance writer, editor and author. I can help you with a wide variety of projects. Check out my new website at www.dennisbyrne.net

  • Meet The Blogger

    Dennis Byrne

    Chicago Tribune contributing op-ed columnist and author of forthcoming historical novel, "Madness: The War of 1812." Reporter, editor and columnist for Chicago Sun-Times and Chicago Daily News. Freelance writer and editor.

  • Subscribe to The Barbershop

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

  • Dennis Byrne’s Facebook Fan Page

  • Categories

  • Like me on Facebook

  • Our National Debt

  • Twitter

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • In reply to jnorto:
      Awk. Please see the correction in the first paragraph. It puts a different light on the discussion. I'm sorry for ...
      Read the story | Reply to this comment
    • The "born alive" rule is not a new invention of the "extreme pro-choice abortion's industry." It was a rule ...
      Read the story | Reply to this comment
    • In reply to Sheri345:
      Indeed. I wasn't trying to ignore the evidence. Here's some more: http://www.kmov.com/story/29182491/peeping-tom-caught-filming-women-in-brentwood-target-dressing-rooms#.VxoX149YJhI.facebook
      Read the story | Reply to this comment
    • That's some interesting math. Obama supporters + Bernie supporters + Trump supporters + Cruz supporters - (Hillary supporters who ...
      Read the story | Reply to this comment
    • fb_avatar
      It is completely inaccurate to ignore the evidence of problems already being caused by transgenders in women's spaces. https://autogynephiliatruth.wordpress.com/2015/06/25/double-standard-mass-media-reports-conceal-rampant-crime-by-male-transgenderites/
      Read the story | Reply to this comment
  • /Users/dennisby/Desktop/trailer.mp4
  • Latest on ChicagoNow

  • Advertisement: