Judge Bolton grants a temporary injunction of the toughest parts of the law while it is further adjudicated, but allowed other parts of the law- to stand.
Among those provisions left standing is a prohibition on the creation of "sanctuary cities," the subject of my posting today in the Chicago Daily Observer.
I haven't read the opinion (linked below) yet, but the immediate thought that came to mind was to wonder about her argue based on federal preemption of state laws. (Article 6 of the U.S. Constitution.) Kidnapping and bank robbery are federal crimes; does that mean any state laws criminalizing kidnapping and bank robbery are, hence, preempted? Could state laws that "create too much of a burden" on federal authorities also be ruled unconstitutional?
I'll be back with more thoughts (if I have any) created by reading the decision.
A quick analysis of the judge's decisions is here.
The complete 36-page decision is here.
The Associated Press story is here.
Posted July 25, 2015 at 12:04 pm
Posted July 21, 2015 at 11:45 am
Posted July 21, 2015 at 7:51 am
Posted July 20, 2015 at 10:27 am
Posted July 19, 2015 at 3:37 pm
Latest on ChicagoNow
from Ex Posts Facto (ExP) by Exavier Pope
posted today at 8:16 pm
from Steve Dale's Pet World by Steve Dale
posted today at 7:54 pm
from Cubs Den by Gunther Dabynsky
posted today at 5:34 pm
from SoxNet by Daniel Shapiro
posted today at 5:09 pm
from Chicago Bulls Confidential by Morten Stig Jensen
posted today at 5:00 pm
Read these ChicagoNow blogs
Read these ChicagoNow Bloggers