Judge Bolton grants a temporary injunction of the toughest parts of the law while it is further adjudicated, but allowed other parts of the law- to stand.
Among those provisions left standing is a prohibition on the creation of "sanctuary cities," the subject of my posting today in the Chicago Daily Observer.
I haven't read the opinion (linked below) yet, but the immediate thought that came to mind was to wonder about her argue based on federal preemption of state laws. (Article 6 of the U.S. Constitution.) Kidnapping and bank robbery are federal crimes; does that mean any state laws criminalizing kidnapping and bank robbery are, hence, preempted? Could state laws that "create too much of a burden" on federal authorities also be ruled unconstitutional?
I'll be back with more thoughts (if I have any) created by reading the decision.
A quick analysis of the judge's decisions is here.
The complete 36-page decision is here.
The Associated Press story is here.
Posted Tuesday at 4:29 pm
Posted Tuesday at 3:58 pm
Posted Tuesday at 8:54 am
Posted May 26, 2015 at 12:05 pm
Posted May 21, 2015 at 12:56 pm
Latest on ChicagoNow
from Cubs Den by John Arguello
posted today at 12:49 am
from Dry it in the Water by Brett Baker
posted today at 12:18 am
from She's Going To Make It After All by AllieSee
posted today at 12:06 am
from Unapologetic by Unapologetic
posted Tuesday at 11:18 pm
from Real Estate Royalty by Melinda Jakovich
posted Tuesday at 11:04 pm
Read these ChicagoNow blogs
Read these ChicagoNow Bloggers