Illinois Republicans betray the promise of school vouchers

Thumbnail image for roger_eddy.jpg

Rep. Roger Eddy: Betrays GOP principles and Chicago school children


Some Illinois House Republicans had an opportunity to give 30,000 poor, black children stuck in some of the worst, most overcrowded Chicago public schools a chance for a better education. But when it came to the moment of truth, they tossed the kids overboard.

Those same Republicans could have participated in one of the most remarkable bipartisan legislative efforts in memory, but they chose to side with the teachers unions and the hundreds of thousands of dollars they have been showering on GOP candidates around the state for years in the hopes of killing school vouchers.

Those Republicans last week helped defeat legislation that would have given students in the 50 worst Chicago public elementary schools $3,700 a year to attend private schools. It would have become the nation's largest school-voucher pilot program. Enactment was looking good after courageous Democrats in the Senate, led by Sen. James Meeks, D-Chicago, joined GOP senators to overwhelmingly pass the legislation.

Then the bill went to the House, where 22 Republicans got out their knives.

Wait, you're asking, aren't school vouchers a Republican/conservative/libertarian core belief? You'd expect Democrats to kill it -- and certainly many did their part -- but why would Republicans join in execution?

The usual explanation is tempting.

Leading the House GOP opposition was one Rep. Roger Eddy, a double dipper from downstate Hutsonville. According to a Family Taxpayers Foundation database, Eddy gets $90,000 as a school superintendent, and his wife, Rebecca, a teacher in one of his schools, earns $40,000. That's in addition to the $68,880 plus per diem he receives as a state legislator. Wait, there's more. According to the Illinois State Board of Elections, state teachers unions have given him $79,182 over nine years in campaign contributions, including $7,750 from the Chicago Teachers Union. You fill in the blanks about why Chicago teachers would be working for the election of a Republican from a town that's a four-hour drive away.

Closer to home, GOP Rep. Rosemary Mulligan of Des Plaines, another voucher opponent, has received $91,482 over 17 years from teachers unions. Of course, when she spelled out the reasons for her nay vote on the House floor, she didn't mention the contributions. In fact, her explanation was so muddled and unpersuasive that I felt embarrassed for her. Stumbling through a web of non sequiturs, she talked about how all kids deserve a public education. Yes, and so? Does that mean they all must be confined to Chicago public schools?

Some other GOP "no" votes and their teachers union contributions: Rich Brauer, Springfield, $11,400; Renee Kosel, Mokena, $119,371; Bill Mitchell, Decatur, $19,830; Jerry Mitchell, Rock Falls, $130,245; Donald Moffitt, Galesburg, $111,125; Sandra Pihos, Glen Ellyn, $5,700; Raymond Poe, Springfield, $55,561; Dennis Reboletti, Addison, $22,250; David Reis, Olney, $7,750; and Chapin Rose, Charleston, $14,602.

Not that I would suggest that the teachers unions bought their votes, although that's the usual script of liberal campaign-finance reformers. No doubt others, such as GOP Rep. Angelo "Skip" Saviano of Elmwood Park -- known to play footsies with Chicago Democrats -- had their own reasons. But the usual excuses offered on the floor -- that vouchers will destroy public schools, don't work and are unconstitutional -- are in dispute if not flat wrong.

House Minority Leader Tom Cross, R-Oswego, and Rep. Kevin Joyce, D-Chicago, deserve immense credit for attempting to gather the 30 votes from each party needed to pass the legislation.

Gov. Pat Quinn deserves discredit for keeping his mouth shut while rumors circulated that he would veto the bill. Every Republican and Democrat who voted for the bill in the face of sure retaliation from the Chicago Teachers Union, Illinois Federation of Teachers and Illinois Education Association gets credit for the courage of putting children above politics.

Meeks, a liberal who has supported an income tax increase, deserves credit for putting together this extraordinary coalition against the traditional opposition of Democrats and liberals against vouchers.

But the Republicans who voted against the bill can give up any pretense that they give a damn about disadvantaged and minority Chicago kids. And the liberals and Democrats who voted against the bill? Their claim of being "progressive" has been demolished. I wonder how they feel about aligning themselves with anti-change and stone-hearted Republicans.

This column also appeared in The Chicago Tribune 

Comments

Leave a comment
  • Vouchers don't work and don't even help the one's in most need. Milwaukee 20 year experiment has been deemed a failure. I wouldn't trust anyone running such a venture here in Chicago or in Illinois. ISBE is incompetent at running programs and that is one of the reasons it did not bring home the Race for the Top grant money. Sorry, voucher special interest can keep their hands out of my pocket!

  • For the third time, Milwaukee's voucher plan has shown to be of no advantage to anyone (http://www.uark.edu/ua/der/SCDP/Milwaukee_Eval/Report_14.pdf). However, vouchers ARE a disadvantage to many. From where does the money come? The public schools. Now, if some students transfer to voucher schools, how will taking money from their former schools help those who stay there? Clearly, it won't. It will hurt. The responsibility for improving public schools doesn't rest with the teachers, either. It rests with the boards of education. Instead of threatening, withholding funds, and closing schools, these boards should do anything and everything to provide these schools with what they need. It's boards of education that are responsible for the quality of schools. Byrne doesn't get that, nor does he wish to face the facts that taking money away from public schools won't make them better. He's lost.

  • What twaddle! Handing over public funds to schools that account neither for their spending nor their achievement data contradicts every notion of accountability that exists in public education today. The entire matter of public subsidies for religious education appears not to be a concern for you, either. Is it not possible the some Republicans actually believe in these things?

    Why is Rep. Meeks right when he's trying to transfer public money to private schools but wrong when he wants to increase public spending on public education? Is he only right when he agrees with you? Nobody's claim to be progressive has been demolished, except in your imagination.

    Just to summarize your argument: "Representative X, Y, and Z took union campaign contributions and voted no. I'm not suggesting that their votes were bought because that's what liberals do. And yet here I am, dwelling on it." Good, honest argument there.

  • nor does he wish to face the facts that taking money away from public schools won't make them better. He's lost.

  • Gentle people, Eric Zorn and I debated this topic recently, which you can see on my blog at: http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/dennis-byrne-barbershop/2010/02/-from-dennis-to-eric.html. Eric and I also compiled a bibliography of studies that examine the issue from all sides. It's also on my blog at: http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/dennis-byrne-barbershop/webliography-school-voucher-programs.html. I hope this helps.

  • How can a voucher pay for a private school? The vouchers talked about are around $3500. I work at a Catholic school where the tuition hovers around $8500. I'm sure parents of struggling students are also struggling themselves. Where will they get the extra $4000? Also, at my school there are 700 students and one special ed teacher. A slow student would drown at this school. Ny guess is that most privte schools would also have problems dealing with a low level student. Whatever happened to the NCLB requirement that poor students in poor schools could go to another school that had better performance in that district? Is that gone? At any rate, with the way the state is behind on education funding, we'll be lucky if the good students finish out the year. When the schools run out of money, the students will run out of time.

  • You can spend all the money you think you have per student,until they and their parents are held accountable for their actions nothing will change.Spend 1 day outside and just observe the behavior of these students.Self responsibility........

Leave a comment

  • ChicagoNow is full of win

    Welcome to ChicagoNow.

    Meet our bloggers,
    post comments, or
    pitch your blog idea.

  • Advertisement:
  • Subscribe to The Barbershop

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

  • Dennis Byrne’s Facebook Fan Page

  • Like me on Facebook

  • google-site-verification: googlefdc32e3d5108044f.html
  • Meet The Blogger

    Dennis Byrne

    Chicago Tribune contributing op-ed columnist and author of forthcoming historical novel, "Madness: The War of 1812." Reporter, editor and columnist for Chicago Sun-Times and Chicago Daily News. Freelance writer and editor.

  • Our National Debt

  • Twitter

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

  • Monthly Archives

  • /Users/dennisby/Desktop/trailer.mp4
  • Latest on ChicagoNow

  • Advertisement:
  • Fresh Chicago News