Bill Brady's tax sin

(This post contains a correction.)

Uh, oh. Republican gubernatorial candidate Bill Brady reluctantly released his income tax returns and we now we know: He didn't pay federal income tax in 2008 and 2009! Nor did he pay state income tax in 2008!


brady.jpg

Bill Brady: Tax hypocrite?

This, we're instructed, is bad news for Brady and good news for Gov. Pat Quinn. It shows Brady's hypocrisy. It reveals the Tea Party's hypocrisy. At least according to the likes of  Quinn. Rich Miller at the* Capital Fax Blog. His campaign's statement, posted on Capitol Fax:


The original Tea Party's rallying cry was "no taxation without representation." Apparently, Senator Brady misinterpreted this line as "no taxation for elected representatives." Since the public was not afforded the opportunity to view his returns, it's likely we won't know how he managed to pay no income taxes on over $100,000 of income in more than one tax year.


Given his track record--of supporting tax cuts for the wealthy but voting against a minimum wage, and of avoiding taxes on the salaries of his campaign officials--it's not surprising that Bill Brady believes a different standard should apply to him.


If Senator Brady is this secretive and controlling about basic information like his tax returns, just imagine how he would govern. After two recent scandal-plagued administrations, Illinois residents deserve better.


You'd think from this that Brady has done something illegal or immoral. 


What's Quinn trying to say? That Brady believes he didn't have to pay taxes because he is an elected representative? Or that because Brady is an elected representative he should pay taxes that the law doesn't require? 

Should Brady not take advantage of a tax break that is provided under the Stimulus Package? Should he ignore his deductible business loses when calculating his taxes? Really, is he supposed to pay taxes on money that he doesn't make?  Should he not accept his refund? Is he supposed to pay more than he owes, and if he doesn't is that a legitimate issue for Gov. Pat Quinn to use against Brady?

Brady's reluctance to disclose his income taxes is a legitimate issue. That he allowed reporters only a peak at his returns is, at best, odd. It makes him look like he is trying to hide something, which he probably is because he's in business and his competitors might find disclosure of some information useful.

But not paying taxes that he doesn't owe is not a legitimate issue. If you don't like tax breaks  then you ought to work to change the tax code. If you can understand it.

*I originally attributed the quote to Rich Miller, who conducts the Capitol Fax blog. That was my error, which I regret. My personal apologies to Rich Miller. 

Comments

Leave a comment
  • It is really funny. How many of these so called journalists, critics, and reporters received tax refunds? How many received 100% tax refunds- meaning the so called watchdogs paid no taxes?

    Can the spell H_Y_P_O_C_R_S_Y?

  • In reply to pvbella:

    Apparently you can't spell it either.

  • In reply to pvbella:

    Any candidate for political office should understand that release of his/her tax returns is a ritual associated with candidacy. The candidate's handlers understand the ritual as symbolizing that "this candudate is honest and has nothing to hide". Refusing to participate in the ritual will raise the index of suspicion in any good reporter. Why?--inquiring minds want to know. Any good reporter will now be looking for evidence of tax hanky-panky by that candidate. How do i know that? Because I spent many years as a reporter and still think like one. The odd behavior of Brady (and now by his running mate) is a scent that should be followed.

Leave a comment

  • ChicagoNow is full of win

    Welcome to ChicagoNow.

    Meet our bloggers,
    post comments, or
    pitch your blog idea.

  • Advertisement:
  • Subscribe to The Barbershop

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

  • Dennis Byrne’s Facebook Fan Page

  • Like me on Facebook

  • google-site-verification: googlefdc32e3d5108044f.html
  • Meet The Blogger

    Dennis Byrne

    Chicago Tribune contributing op-ed columnist and author of forthcoming historical novel, "Madness: The War of 1812." Reporter, editor and columnist for Chicago Sun-Times and Chicago Daily News. Freelance writer and editor.

  • Our National Debt

  • Twitter

  • Categories

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

    • It is hard to see any difference between the Obergefell decision and the 1967 decision in Loving v. Virginia. ...
      Read the story | Reply to this comment
    • In reply to Dennis Byrne:
      You didn't address the first question. Nor my last point. BTW, is this what you say to your gay friends?
      Read the story | Reply to this comment
    • Let's remember that the first amendment's protections are aimed at protecting individual rights from government actions. Yes, religions can discriminate, ...
      Read the story | Reply to this comment
    • How do you define a national consensus? According to most polls a clear majority of Americans support gay marriage. ...
      Read the story | Reply to this comment
    • fb_avatar
      I love to watch in real the Christmas light shows, it's make great fun to watch directly and feel awesome. ...
      Read the story | Reply to this comment
  • Monthly Archives

  • /Users/dennisby/Desktop/trailer.mp4
  • Latest on ChicagoNow

  • Advertisement: