The cost of Stupak's, Costello's and 9 other's votes for health care: $4.7 billion in earmarks

As soon as Rep. Bart Supak (D-Mich), Jerry Costello (D-Ill) and the others decided that DemCare was in the public interest, lots of people started asking: What did it to sell out their pro-life consciences to buy their votes? 

Here's a possible answer from the the Sunlight Foundation.  The day after the vote, the 11 put in for a shipload of earmarks, costing you, me and other taxpayers $4.7 billion. They sold out their pro-life positions for an average of $429 million each. Well, if you sell out your principles, it ought to be worth it in cash.

Of the eight lawmakers whose 2010 requests were available for comparison, five requested more money this week than they did a year ago: Rep. Jerry Costello, D-Ill., Rep. Kathy Dahlkemper, D-Pa., Rep. Joe Donnelly, D-Ind., Brad Ellsworth, D-Ind., Rep. Marcy Kaptur, D-Ohio, and Rep. Charles Wilson, D-Ohio.

The eleven members were the focus of high level pressure by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other top Democrats because they threatened to vote against the health care reform bill, whichpassed the House on Sunday, March 21, by a seven vote margin. Granting earmark requests are one of the ways leadership can encourage members to vote their way.

Stupak requested more than $578 million in earmarks, including $125 million for a replacement lock on the Sault Ste. Marie, $25.6 million to build a federal courthouse in Marquette, Mich., $15 million to repaint the Mackinac Bridge and $800,000 to preserve the Quincy Mining Company smelter near Hancock in Michigan's Upper Peninsula.


Despite a newly enacted ban on earmarks to for-profit firms, Stupak requested a total of $52 million for companies in his district out of the $65.9 million he requested from the Defense Appropriations bill.

Requests from Costello increased the most, but that was due to a $1.35 billion request to fund federal program called Impact Aid, which assists local educational agencies. Costello, along with 44 other lawmakers, signed a letter sent to the Appropriations Committee requesting the funds. Earlier this month, House Republicans decided to forgo earmarks for the 2011 appropriations process. House Democrats barred earmarks to for-profit companies, which mostly impacts contractors seeking earmarks from the Defense Appropriations bill.

So, here's the deal: To enact DemCare, which a majority of Americans clearly don't want, another $4 billion is being sought in earmarks, which most Americans don't want. And Washington and its media acolytes have trouble figuring out why Americans and "Tea Baggers" are angry?


Leave a comment
  • Just remember these "friends" of ours in november.Where are the headlines in the newspapers?????Where is the "lame"stream press???Are they all in the pocket of the dnc????Looks that way. What a bunch of cowards.You are wondering why your sales are down,gee.

Leave a comment

  • Advertisement:
  • Advertisement:
  • ChicagoNow is full of win

    Welcome to ChicagoNow.

    Meet our bloggers,
    post comments, or
    pitch your blog idea.

  • Visit my new website

    I'm a freelance writer, editor and author. I can help you with a wide variety of projects. Check out my new website at

  • Subscribe to The Barbershop

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

  • Dennis Byrne’s Facebook Fan Page

  • Like me on Facebook

  • Our National Debt

  • Twitter

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

  • /Users/dennisby/Desktop/trailer.mp4
  • Latest on ChicagoNow

  • Advertisement: