Global Warming malarky

In the next few weeks we'll be relentlessly scrubbed with eyewash,
brainwash and hogwash, all designed to cleanse us of any doubts that
global warming is a proven menace to mother Earth.

there's the Democratic global warming legislation rushing through


Global warming alarmists dishonor the memory of such courageous scientists as Galileo and the respect he had for objective science

with a denouement expected soon. Second, the rush to pass the
legislation is fueled by the upcoming United Nations meeting on global warming next month in Copenhagen. President Barack Obama and Democrats want to be able to go there with a goody basket of economy-busting measures that will show the world that America is with it.

bad, because the alleged "scientific" evidence of a coming man-made
apocalypse is incomplete at best and, more likely, manipulated for
political reasons.

That's obviously not the conventional
wisdom. According to climate alarmists, only "skeptics" or "deniers"
would ignore the "scientific consensus" that the planet is doomed
without draconian acts of economic self-immolation. We know this
because Al Gore, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, and European smarties have told us so.

also the view of the United Nations-sponsored Fourth Assessment Report
of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Working Group-1
-- the climate alarmist's bible. It contains, they allege, all the
evidence you need to justify their frenzy.

Is that so?

that study itself has been studied by an independent group of
scientists who concluded that the IPCC bible is wrong. They said the
IPCC document "is marred by errors and misstatements, ignores
scientific data that were available but were inconsistent with the
authors' pre-conceived conclusions, and has already been contradicted
in important parts by research published since May 2006, the IPCC's
cutoff date."

To back up the conclusion, the independent group,
called the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change
(NIPCC), published its own analysis in a tome called "Climate Change
Reconsidered." The 856-page, nearly two-inch-thick volume did what all
good science requires: check the work of fellow scientists to see if it
stands up to a rigorous review of the available research, data and

What they found is stunning. For example, the IPCC
claimed that "most of the observed increase in global average
temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely (at least 90
percent certain) due to the increase in anthropogenic (man-made)
greenhouse gas concentrations" (Emphasis in the original.) Wrong; the
opposite is true. Blame it on natural causes, the NIPCC said.

IPCC claims that global warming will wreck humanity and the Earth.
Wrong. The NIPCC concludes -- using the data and science available to
the IPCC -- that a "warmer world would be a safer and healthier world
for humans and wildlife alike."

The IPCC relies on complicated
computer climate models to reach its dour conclusions; the NIPCC rips
the methodology, challenging the reliability of models to make such
cosmic predictions. The NIPCC reveals that the IPCC failed to consider
naturally occurring "feedback" factors that reduce the impact of
atmospheric carbon dioxide. Reviewing the empirical data, the NIPCC
finds no evidence that climate change in the last century is
unprecedented. Nor do the data demonstrate an anthropogenic effect on
climate change. Nor is there evidence that anthropogenic factors are
melting glaciers, raising sea levels or precipitating other
catastrophic weather or climate changes. The IPCC ignored research
probing solar activity as a cause of climate change. It ignored
research showing that rising carbon dioxide levels actually increase
plant growth to the benefit of all mankind and the planet. It ignored
research that global warming will improve, not harm, human health and
increase, not decrease, biodiversity.

Climate change alarmists
will condemn these findings as unspeakable and unthinkable. They will
point to who is doing the research or who is paying for it, while
ignoring the substance of the research. They won't bother contacting
Chicago-based Heartland Institute, the report's publisher, to get their
own copy.

An honest examination of the science will reveal
perhaps the only indisputable fact in this entire argument: The science
is not settled and claims of a scientific consensus are an
exaggeration, if not a deception. A scientific consensus -- if such a
thing even exists -- would be surprising for any issue that is as
complicated as this, involving so many different branches of science.
As a layman struggling to comprehend this avalanche of science, I was
struck by one truth: Beware of any "science" that claims to fully
describe in single theory any phenomenon as complex as global climate
change. Trying to tie it all up in such a neat package, as climate
alarmists do, is a trap for the simple-minded.

This column also appeared in the Chicago Tribune


Leave a comment
  • Don't worry,even if global warming alaemists are right it will soon be reversed when the entire whole is overrun with chia Obamas.

  • Hey, Pinhead! Ahem, I mean, "Dear Mr. Byrne," How do you feel about the Pentagon? I bet you like it just fine. And why not? It's the Pentagon's job to keep this country safe. Well, Byrne baby, the Pentagon believes global warming is VERY REAL. And the Pentagon is VERY CONCERNED about it. They recognize the impending political and military instability that is going to be brought about by global warming. By crops being wiped out. By cities becoming submerged. By potable water drying up. They are planning ahead for it. The Pentagon considers global warming VERY REAL.
    Now, how do you feel about the private insurance industry? Not the health insurance industry....the property insurance industry. You're a right-winger to the core, so I'm sure you love the insurance industry, just as you love all corporations. Well, guess what Byrnie baby? The insurance industry considers global warming to be VERY REAL. They are working feverishly (hey....that's a joke attention son!) to protect themselves against onerous losses resulting from global warming. So, there you go, Dennis. Two institutions absolutely beloved by conservatives like yourself.....the Pentagon, and the insurance industry, and they say you're full of hot air Dennis (hey...that's another joke! You're too slow boy, keep your eye on the ball!) They say global warming is a very real threat.

  • Mr. Byrne, by speaking out so vehemently against even a possibility of climate change, you undermine those who favor engaging in preventative measures to ensure clean air and water for future generations. When did it become evil to help keep the place clean? And how can you not see Man's impact on our earth? I know you must fly; look at how Chicago goes on forever. LA, the same only more smog. China, the most populated country, emits the most CO2. America, the worlds most wasteful country, is number two. And the tiny island of Borneo is number three, based on Man's desire for palm oil. The top three polluters are based on Man. If you truly believe what you wrote, then I pity your blindness and your absolute selfishness.

  • Dear Dennis,

    I read your column Beware the Climate Change Alarmists in this morning

  • Dear Mr. Byrne:
    I hope that you do not get sued by the tobacco industry for plagiarizing their old "But it hasn't been proven that smoking cigarettes causes lung cancer!" campaign for your anti-global warming screed.

  • Mr. Byrne:

    Who's really the alarmist here? By predicting an economic meltdown, you are no different. Yet BP saved millions by implementing the Kyoto protocol, and California has matched Europe's per capita energy usage without destroying its economy. And now PG&E and Apple have ended their Chamber of Commeerce membership because of the Chamber's view on global warming. It seems conservatives will resort to anything to avoid change.

  • In reply to StephenSchade:

    Well put, StephenSchade. Our own local electric utility, Exelon (which is, rather, the parent company of several electric and gas utilities,) has also left the Chamber of -Horrors- Commerce over their climate change obstructionism.

Leave a comment

  • ChicagoNow is full of win

    Welcome to ChicagoNow.

    Meet our bloggers,
    post comments, or
    pitch your blog idea.

  • Advertisement:
  • Visit my new website

    I'm a freelance writer, editor and author. I can help you with a wide variety of projects. Check out my new website at

  • Meet The Blogger

    Dennis Byrne

    Chicago Tribune contributing op-ed columnist and author of forthcoming historical novel, "Madness: The War of 1812." Reporter, editor and columnist for Chicago Sun-Times and Chicago Daily News. Freelance writer and editor.

  • Subscribe to The Barbershop

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

  • Dennis Byrne’s Facebook Fan Page

  • Categories

  • Like me on Facebook

  • Our National Debt

  • Twitter

  • Tags

  • Recent Comments

  • /Users/dennisby/Desktop/trailer.mp4
  • Latest on ChicagoNow

  • Advertisement: