Bears Release Mark Anderson

mark-anderson-1.jpg

Comments

Leave a comment
  • First!

  • damn...my frat brother is gone. have 1 left in AA, but i don't think this was the answer to anything. he was actually producing pressure from what i saw; Jerry Angelo is a fuckin' idiot

  • The front office of this organization never ceases to amaze me.

  • In reply to Vicp71:

    Yup. JUST when you think they can't embarrass themselves any more than they have, they surprise you!

  • Time for Wooten to suit up and play.

  • Anderson registered five tackles, no sacks, one tackle-for-loss and a team-leading six quarterback pressures.

  • Could this be a a prelude to something that sounds like

    "Tommie, Coach wants to see you. Oh, and bring your playbook." ?

  • In reply to Albertintucson:

    They love Harris so much, they will put him at DEnd!

    Seriously though, I like this move. We need a beast opposite Peppers. I miss Alex Brown. Maybe Roach will rotate with Izzy, or the Rook LB Iwuh*?

  • In reply to Albertintucson:

    Boy, who misses Alex Brown?

    I guarantee the folks at the Hallowed Halls of Halas are missing 96 right now. Wonder if release of Mark Anderson is finally an admission of incompetence.

  • In reply to Albertintucson:

    We'll adopt the Packers defense. Peppers will be the lone down lineman. Everyone else will be a linebacker or DB.

    We'll have Pringles back soon, it's all good.

  • In reply to Albertintucson:

    Hey, hopefully this guy can beat one on one and get the sacks that JP can't get when teams triple team him. I hope.

  • There's a knock at the door.

    Tommie Harris: "Who's there?"

    Door Knocker: "It's 'The Turk' ".

    Tommie: "Oh. Yeah. Been expectin' you."

  • In reply to Albertintucson:

    He has got to be next.

  • In reply to Albertintucson:

    Please - if any of the MSM guys with something resembling actual access read this blog - or Jeff Joniak who gets to do a pre-game show with Angelo on WBBM are reading this -

    First, punch Angelo in the face. ok ok, I get it you can't do that.

    Ask him if he regrets letting AB go in favor of keeping Harris and Anderson. Just ask him that. Fuck.

  • In reply to gpldan:

    Don't ask him anything, it's all just turds falling from his mouth anyway, just punch him. When he's he on the ground kick him square in the nuts and drop some masonry on his head.

  • In reply to Albertintucson:

    So basically, Alex Brown should still be a Bear right now...and both of the players who prevented him from being one shouldn't be on the team anymore because they suck(Anderson bye bye and Tommie). That is really, really frustrating.

    Not only would Alex have been a great compliment to Peppers on the DLine...how sick would the field goal blocking have been with him, Peppers, and Izzy in the middle of the line?

  • In reply to BearDown1982:

    +1 '82. +1.

  • In reply to BearDown1982:

    How about accountabily for the offense?Or we dont want to go against the genius Tice and Martz.

    Their schemes almost got your "franchise" qb killed on IR.

  • In reply to johnkos:

    THEIR SCHEMES ALSO WON THE LAST TWO GAMES! MY GOD, PEOPLE, WAKE UP.

  • In reply to JeffHughes:

    We're all rattled by the sheer scale of the offensive debacle. I hate to say it, but some times I appreciate the fact that Lovie doesn't lose his cool one way or the other.

    I wonder how long it will take the O-line to gel?

  • In reply to JeffHughes:

    This team is flatout better than last year's.

  • In reply to JeffHughes:

    Yeah, but that's not saying much...

  • In reply to drewkent23:

    I say the jury is still out on that, Mayor Vaughn.

  • In reply to drewkent23:

    from PFT:
    This move continues the trend towards accountability on Lovie Smith's defense, which is a good thing. But Grant couldn't even stick with the Dolphins this year and the signing sends a clear message about another transaction Chicago made in the summer.

    The Bears regret cutting Alex Brown.
    Doh!
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6GuEswXOXo&feature=related

  • In reply to JeffHughes:

    I would agree that we are better than last year...but holes are still prevalent. Why do we not at least consider a possible improvement..but instead "We are all set" is our mantra.

  • In reply to nicholsra:

    I think this team is better than last year right now. The defense is encouraging, giving up less than 17 points a game right now. We just need to ramp up that offense.

  • In reply to TheFifth:

    Not buying the 'defense is great' anymore. the Giants ran rough-shod over us. Jacobs average 10 YPC, Bradshaw about 5.5 on 23 carries. We're about to play DeAngelo and Johnny Stewart.

  • In reply to JeffHughes:

    no,Jeff I want these BEARS to wake up and BEAR THE FUCK DOWN!! AND BE DALLAS BOUND IN FEB!!!

  • In reply to JeffHughes:

    The quarterback is certainly flat out.

  • In reply to JeffHughes:

    Yup, it's not the scheme's I'm worried about, it's our personal. Is Williams going to suit up against the Panthers?

  • In reply to JeffHughes:

    It's just become very apparent and disappointing to me that many of you prefer this team be poor.

  • In reply to JeffHughes:

    Blogfather..I don't believe it is that we "prefer the team to be poor" It is the questionable timing and it's out come..AB is a prime example.

  • In reply to JeffHughes:

    Easy, Mayor. Some folks saw a fin in the water Sunday. maybe it's a dolphin but some folks think it may be a shark.

  • In reply to Albertintucson:

    I don't mind people hating what happened Sunday night. But the response has been ridiculous. We can't block. We know that before Sunday night.

  • In reply to JeffHughes:

    Week to week. Don't get too giddy when they win, don't jump off a bridge when they lose.

  • In reply to JeffHughes:

    Your point is correct but Sunday night was an epic failure. That's the reason for the panic on the board. I've watched the beloved since the early '60's and I've never seen a worse performance by a Bears OL than the 1st half of Sunday night. Will we get it fixed? Who knows?

  • In reply to CanadaBear:

    I understand Noah jackson is coming in for a tryout.

  • In reply to Albertintucson:

    AKA. "Buddah".

  • In reply to Albertintucson:

    Al..that's wrong on some many levels..lol

  • In reply to nicholsra:

    Just like to see who's paying attention, Lobo.

  • In reply to Albertintucson:

    Bring in Revie Sorey also. Robin Earl can be our backup H-back when they sit Dez out.

  • In reply to Albertintucson:

    Weneedtwogaurds,aFSandaTackle.lol.

  • In reply to CanadaBear:

    I started watching the Bears in 1965, and I cannot remember one worse either, Canada.

  • In reply to Mastodon:

    SC..are you sure bro..because the 70's were pretty bad.

  • In reply to nicholsra:

    Lobo, the '70's were awful but I've never seen anything like the first half Sunday night. Not to mention, whomever was the QB it didn't matter if he got smoked. After we got Walter (75) we were always trying to run not always trying to pass.

  • In reply to Mastodon:

    Here is some trivia..well sort of..does anyone remember a time when a certain RB had to play QB (Pre-Wildcat)..anybody..it's pretty easy..I don't remeber the specific game but I do remember him playing that position.

  • In reply to nicholsra:

    Wally Payton vs the Redskins ?

  • In reply to IrishBearsFan:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eSdMqnmj5T8

  • In reply to nicholsra:

    Of course, it's Walter. On another trivia kick, against Baltimore we knocked out all 3 of their QB's and their RB took over at QB. It was Tom Matte and they still beat us. Fuck did we stink back then (70's).

  • In reply to JeffHughes:

    C'mon ... Cutler nearly got murdered. This isn't about yards per attempt, this is about The Franchise QB. We are nothing without Jay Cutler. With Rosenfels we had a chance, but nothing without Cutty.

  • In reply to JeffHughes:

    "We cant block" results in your franchise QB getting killed.That is something we did not know before Sunday night.

  • In reply to Albertintucson:

    LDL's Accountability..Really if that were the case LDL and the Band of Clowns would of been gone last year..Jebus..the media is drinking LDL's Koolaid.. ACCOUNTABILITY SHEITE!

  • In reply to JeffHughes:

    Sunday nights game was worse than poor, it was pathetic. We need to start jelling on offense very soon. Cutler's psychy will not be able to withstand another game like that. He already had happy feet before that game and the only thing that's going to settle him down is some decent blocking. You can't discount that teams will be going through that Giants game film with a fine tooth comb in an effort to duplicate what the Giants were able to do to our line. It would be one thing if the Giants defense was 85 esk but I don't think that was they case. The Giants have very talented players and I'm just hoping that the next time we face a team with those kind of players on their D, we'll have our act together.

  • In reply to ImissButkus:

    Like Collinsworth said on Sunday night, he had noticed Cutler's eyes dropping against Dallas and it was more evident against the Giants. Can't blame him really.

  • In reply to JeffHughes:

    Jeff, it's like believing you uncle has finally decided to stop drinking. Sure he can do it, but you don't believe he can till he proves it to you. One day sober or three weeks sober doesn't mean he has quit. Just means three weeks. Good start. But just three weeks.

  • In reply to Bears85Sweetness23:

    +1 Sweetness

  • In reply to Bears85Sweetness23:

    Hope your uncle sticks with it Artoo. I'm two years sober last month. I miss sex with strangers, but what the hey.

  • In reply to JeffHughes:

    The 2010 Chicago Bears are going to the playoffs.

  • In reply to JeffHughes:

    Erronius on all accounts. ok fine, maybe a few

  • In reply to JeffHughes:

    Mark Anderson is standing in the way of the development of Henry Melton. If the BT did not have confidence in Melton, Anderson would still be wearing the uniform.

    Favorite Alex Brown moment - goal line stand against the Eagles, Brown bowls over two would be blockers and leaps over the third to stuff the run and preserve the win. Get Some!!

  • In reply to PhantomOne:

    And your memory is fucked. Brown crashed down from the right end and collared Buckhalter.

  • In reply to bears5003:

    Here's my favorite Brown moment against the Packers. Blocked FG at the end of regulation.
    http://wn.com/Alex_Brown_Blocked_Field_Goal_Bears_vs_Packers

  • In reply to PhantomOne:

    Alex Brown is not a Bear. Can't take that one back now, like it or not. I'm not sure how this move upgrades anything. I guess it clears more playing time for Izzy... who I like. Still, we need depth at DE. The Bears have a better track record for evaluating talent on Defense than Offense, but shaking up the personnel on the one side of the ball that has been productive/consistant thus far seems like a bad move.

    Something else must be going on behind the scenes. It seems uncommon for a regular starter to get released by week 5, doesn't it?? I have to think we tried to work a trade... no luck.

  • In reply to PhantomOne:

    They're freeing salary space by dumping a horrible contract IN ORDER to improve the OL.
    This isn't that complicated. I guarantee we will be adding an OL somewhere along the line, and frankly, losing MA isn't exactly a net loss to the productivity of our Defensive line. We all know that.

  • In reply to MikeBrownhadaPosse:

    MBP...I feel the same way about MA but we...do you think are we going after? for O-Line

  • In reply to MikeBrownhadaPosse:

    They aren't freeing salary space. MA was signed through this year and he's getting his entire salary from the Bears ($1.75 mil). Anyone that gets cut once the season starts gets their entire contract for that year unless they violate that contract (getting arrested, PED's, etc.). Not sure what's going on. Unless they are trying to get Wooten some playing time. Grant used to be good. Who knows about the 2010 version?

    I hated to see Alex get cut but he wasn't worth $5 mil/year. Not that I care, it's not my money. I'm sure he would have at least a sack or two with Pep on the other side. Oh well, can't un-ring the bell.

  • In reply to CanadaBear:

    You're right - one year contract, vested veteran...the Bears can conceivably end up eating the rest of the contract unless he was cut for something we don't know about.

  • In reply to CanadaBear:

    Unring the Bell is a great song by my favorite band, Govt Mule. Nice analogy Canada.

  • In reply to TheFifth:

    I saw those guys a few years ago. Rocked the Fucking House!

  • In reply to CanadaBear:

    My money is on the following scenario:

    Panthers pick up Anderson for a bag of half-eaten Cheetos (Puffs, at that).
    Anderson finally gets a few sacks this year against our piss-porous O-Line.

    Wait. And. See.

  • In reply to JohnGalt:

    WWG..now stop that! lol

  • In reply to JohnGalt:

    I want Jamar back. Roach is out and the panthers aren't even starting JW so they won't know what they're missing if we try and get him back. HH gone, Roach out and a bunch of pussy backups. Bring back Jamar.

  • In reply to JeffHughes:

    Jeff, I also find it rediculous that most "fans" commenting around here are mostly just around to bitch. It's cool to complain when you have a team that is underachieving and putting shit out on the field, but when you are 3-1 and leading your division it becomes almost laughable. In this case, people are pissed because they dumped a player the wasn't performing? Or is it that they should keep around AB or Goon just because they were fan favorites? AB hasn't done shit in NO and there was a reason Goon was a street FA up until a week ago. Fact is that the front office is making moves where they can to improve a first place team. And fuck last year and the year before that and the year before that. None of it means anything. The players that come and go either by draft or FA, who cares. Every year is different and the reality is you all should be on board or get the fuck off. The sky is not falling, so stop waiting for it to do so.

  • In reply to bears5003:

    Please. Spare me.

  • In reply to gpldan:

    Case and point, right there.

  • In reply to bears5003:

    Food Fight?

  • In reply to bears5003:

    Exactly; a newb coming in and telling everyone to get off. Spare me too, please.

  • In reply to bears5003:

    Get back to us when you've chosen an avatar.

  • In reply to gpldan:

    Choose an Avatar? Hilarious.

  • In reply to gpldan:

    The Good: Anderson is finally gone.
    The Bad: Grant doesn't look to be better and they still need O-line.
    The Ugly: Cutting Alex looks even dumber.

  • In reply to bears5003:

    Fantasy down on Da Bears

    http://insider.espn.go.com/sports/fantasy/blog?name=karabell_eric_football&id=5651353&action=upsell&appRedirect=http%3a%2f%2finsider.espn.go.com%2fsports%2ffantasy%2fblog%3fname%3dkarabell_eric_football%26id%3d5651353

  • In reply to gpldan:

    No Kidding, I was Bear heavy on most of my teams hoping for a breakout game from out boys. Unfortunately they flubbed they dub and most of my teams tanked.

  • In reply to bears5003:

    We got no pass protection, we got no run game.......our QUARTERBACKS' HEADS ARE FALLIN' OFF!!!

  • In reply to bears5003:

    dude who are you to give us regulars shit?

  • In reply to bears5003:

    For all the shit that Jerry Angelo gets, his latest offseason boner-jam is about the only thing worth a damn on this shitty squad.

  • In reply to bears5003:

    ....that's not to say he isn't a complete shitbag. Because he is.

  • In reply to bears5003:

    Leave a comment...new thread!

  • In reply to bears5003:

    And I'll see you with a, "and who the fuck are you?".

    Long time lurker, first time poster. Why don't you post a little more first before you try to shit on us regulars.

    But thanks for the effort.

  • In reply to MB30SD:

    The best part of each reaction here is that you all identify with what was written. I frequently posted prior to Chicago-Now, when there was positivity all over this blog. If you'll notice, Jeff takes the time to look at the Bears in the same positive manner that he did several years ago. In fact you put too much "effort" into being the resident "Bear" fans on this blog spewing negativity. Jeff is right. You'd all rather have the Bears be shitty to allow you to bitch about management than watch quatlity team and provide some sort of insight that you can't get from the Trib or Sun-Times.

  • In reply to bears5003:

    Way to join the club douche. You don't even have internet social skills. I can't imagine what its like for you in real life. Nice condescending first post!

  • In reply to Crowned:

    Internet social skills? I'm not trying to join your club, just pointing out what each of you have reaffirmed in replying to what I wrote.

  • In reply to bears5003:

    Does anyone think we'd be sack leaders if Brown was still here? Yes he was a good loyal show-up-for-work 100% Bear. But he wasn't Dwight Freeney or Peppers. It doesn't really work unless we get another one of those guys or a tackle that can do what Tommie used to do. I was behind Tommie the whole way, I thought we'd see a rejuvenated Tommie the way I knew Brian would come new and improved Carlito Brigante mofo to the masses. Pero no, no mas.

  • In reply to JeffHughes:

    A few thoughts on the meaning of the dearly departed Twiggy Anderson:

    Rookie year was a Tommy Harris aided fluke.
    Melton needs some time at end, he's a player
    Wooten is getting healthy, he's nearly the same size as Peppers

  • In reply to MASOCHR:

    Definitely agree on Melton. Every time he's in the the guy is making noise.

  • In reply to MASOCHR:

    Dude looks like a fucking pez dispencer Coach. Cracks me up every time I look at the dude. I think a cherry lozenge is going to pop out of his thoat when he laughs.

  • In reply to MASOCHR:

    Melton is all motor, and fun to watch. I have a friend that new him at Texas, and the kid does nothing but work. Any word on how Wooten's knee is holding up? If that kid can recapture the kind of first step and power he had as a junior, we could be in business. I like our chances moving forward with Peppers, Matty T, Melton, Wooten(healthy), AA, and Izzy..........why does it feel like I'm missing somebody? Do you think we could convince Jerry Jones to take Butters for Ratliff? That would be a flat-out steal.

    I still believe we are 7-1 at the bye.

  • In reply to MattySouthside:

    No Matter what happens, the Dolphins have our number. The curse of the Fins. Henne to Marshall all day long baby, to sting Jerry right in the ass.

  • In reply to JeffHughes:

    here is a fans observation about what we just picked up:

    Grant is a fat, out of shape, washed up player. That's a shame too, because when he was motivated, he was really good.

    Great a 2009 version of Butter!

  • In reply to JeffHughes:

    Jeff, I don't think that's true at all. Sure some of the posters like to bitch. They have a hard time dealing with favorites that are gone and least favorites that are still around. Every regular poster on the blog wants us to win and kick ass in the SB.

  • In reply to CanadaBear:

    +1
    Trying to find positives in Sunday night's apocalyptic effort is for the Stuart Smalleys of the world.

  • In reply to JeffHughes:

    Name one poster who feels that way. I don't even think there's anyone on here who would wish for a blowout year for the high picks. I hate that shit.

  • In reply to JeffHughes:

    That IS Murray Hamilton as "Larry Vaughn, the mayor of Shark City", Blogfather! LOL!

    He was also great as "Alphonse Paquette" in ANATOMY OF A MURDRER which, by the way, could describe the Bears' offensive line play Sunday evening.

  • In reply to JeffHughes:

    Nah. Refusal to run? This is the NFL. You cannot pass the ball 2 to 1. We also need a FB. Lousaka Polite has converted his last 20 short yardage conversion attempts. And we couldn't use him. We had a sniff of beating the Giants if we just went with the run and then built some play-actions and screens off that. Simple stuff. There *was* no scheme against the Giants. Someone tell me what the scheme was.

  • In reply to IrishBearsFan:

    The scheme was, "I'll show you we have an O-line" and then about 4 sacks into it, it changed to, "O, u don't believe me? I'm gonna put in even more 7 step drops!"

    result: broken qb.

    It's the same philosophy the Mandaulbaum's in the Seinfeld ep live by "We're taking it up a notch"! that lands the son, father and grandfather in the hospital.

  • In reply to johnkos:

    Maybe the Bears are making room for a o lineman. Also Mark Anderson may have gotten busted for something. Could me more to come on this soon.

  • In reply to ImissButkus:

    Yeah, it's not like he was sucking that bad. You know the top brass is screaming for a lineman - they're not that retarded. The Franchise just got pounded 17 times in one half of football. I'm very surprised he plays this week.

    Anyone got any opinions on Patrick Turner? WR for the Jets -6'5 .. ahem ....and just cut along with Clowney.

  • In reply to IrishBearsFan:

    I always liked Turner. I thought he or Barden would had been a good pick for the Bears, but they went with Iglesias instead (I think that was the same year).

    He made a lot of big catches for USC, my only gripe was he tended to have butter fingers and drop easy ones. Big red zone target though. Definitely worth a look.

  • In reply to Albertintucson:

    Was anyone ok with Alex Brown leaving?

    I wasn't.

  • In reply to Bears85Sweetness23:

    Oven Mits should still be here 85, no doubt about it.

  • In reply to Bears85Sweetness23:

    I don't remember ANYONE on this blog, including Trolls, who thought THAT was a good move!

  • In reply to Albertintucson:

    There were a few Al that said AB was too expensive and preferred giving Anderson a shot, but the vast majority knew what was up.

  • In reply to Crowned:

    Probably could have saved as much or more by sending Anderson packing along with that boat anchor, Tommie Harris.

  • In reply to Bears85Sweetness23:

    Trade today:

    Marshawn Lynch to Seattle for a #4 and aanother conditional pick.

    Sorry about that, Green Bay.

    I understand Cheeseheads everywhere are melting down becuase Ted Thompson whiffed on that possible acquisition.

  • In reply to Albertintucson:

    +1

  • In reply to Albertintucson:

    This says it all:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oEQcxTyiwWQ&feature=related

  • In reply to Albertintucson:

    Yes, picked up Marshawn and Mike Bell this week already. Sweet.

  • In reply to Bears85Sweetness23:

    Hmm... I wonder what the line would look like with Brown and Johnson still on the team. Now we cant waive Harris .. we have to get SOMETHING for out $4 mil. I'm hoping ofr miracles from Grant. He's got his big chance lets hope he makes the most of it.

  • In reply to Bears85Sweetness23:

    Speaking of "Accountability"....

    Monday night, The Dolphins surrendered a blocked punt, a blocked field goal (returned for a TD, I believe) AND a kick0ff return for a TD.

    THAT, my friends, is a Special Teams "Hat Trick".

    5 Hours after the game the Fins fired their Special teams Coach.

  • In reply to Albertintucson:

    Last year we were 3-1 and traded for Gaines Adams.That ruined chemistry on the defensive side of the ball.

    We all know how that went for team and the players.

    Angelo and Lovie....I dont know what kind of weed those two are smoking..but they cant seem to get out of their osterrich act.

  • In reply to johnkos:

    Great call. Let's blame Lovie and Angelo for the sudden and mysterious death of Adams. If they're smoking weed; you're smoking crank.

  • In reply to Crowned:

    WTF?Drink some beer mate and chill.Where did I write or imply that they were responsible for his death?

    We are talking football non off the filed issues.

  • In reply to johnkos:

    Signed Charles Grant to a 1 year deal. Probably an upgrade.

    if Mark Anderson where a sexual act he'd be premature ejaculation after that rookie year burst, and erectile dysfunction ever since.

  • In reply to johnkos:

    Jeff, we understand we won three games and that one loss doesn't mean it's over.

    Our problem is we saw a 3-1 start last year and it went downhill from there.

    Grant it, we didn't have Pepper's or Urlacher.

  • In reply to Bears85Sweetness23:

    3-1 doesn't mean shit if Cutler goes on the IR.

  • In reply to johnkos:

    Per Wikiped on Charles Grant

    Legal troubles
    Grant was indicted on a charge of involuntary manslaughter stemming from a February 2008 altercation at a nightclub in which a pregnant woman was shot to death outside a Blakely, Georgia nightclub. Korynda Reed, 23, and her unborn fetus died after being taken to the Southeast Alabama Medical Center in Dothan after the fight early in the morning of February 3, 2008. Grant has said that he was neither an instigator nor a participant in the fight. Grant was arraigned on August 15, 2008.[7] The criminal case was resolved in May 2010 when Grant pleaded guilty to a charge of public affray, he was assessed a $1,000 fine and a year's probation, and ordered to pay $20,000 for the cost of the investigation by the sheriff's office; the more serious involuntary murder charge was dismissed. Grant still faced a civil suit by the family of the victim.[8][9]

  • In reply to MASOCHR:

    So, what you're saying is that, you're surprised the Bengals didn't grab him up?

  • In reply to Albertintucson:

    pretty much...

  • In reply to MASOCHR:

    LOL. And thanks for the "Rap sheet report", Coach!

  • In reply to MASOCHR:

    Everyone aware of Cedric Benson's contribution to the Bengals loss sunday?

  • In reply to Albertintucson:

    hhhhhhhhhhhhhheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeehhhhhhhhhhhhhhheeeeeeeeeeeee!

  • In reply to MASOCHR:

    Too funny. Not sure if it's this way any more, but the Bengals "Scout" site rates you on how many posts you make like other ones, but you start with like a DUI and work your way up to attempted murder or something.

  • In reply to MASOCHR:

    Yeah, but can he play football? I wish Tank was still here.

  • In reply to johnkos:

    Ruined the chemistry? I'd say after eeking out a win against the Steelers and beating up on the Lions... we just got exposed as a poor defensive team in 09.

    If you're going to blame something, blame having 54 on the IR. Our front 7 is so so much better with him and Peppers. That's the difference.

    Gains Adams hardly saw the field prior to about week 8 or 9. Even then he was just part of the rotation.

    Releasing BOTH starting DE's at the end of 09 was a huge mistake.. and all so we could bring in malimaliuna (or whatever). The guy has been just short of useless. I'd rather have Brown any day.

  • In reply to johnkos:

    http://blogs.nfl.com/2010/10/05/orton-no-longer-below-the-radar/

  • In reply to Albertintucson:

    There was also an interception return for a TD wasn't there?

  • What does that accomplish? I guess maybe open a roster spot for Josh Beekman. He's still a free agent.

  • In reply to TheGhostofHalas:

    How about Afalava? I don't think anyone has signed him yet.

  • Julius Peppers: "C'mon, folks, I can play EITHER defensive end position but even I CAN'T PLAY BOTH AT THE SAME TIME!!!!

  • "Arise oh, Israel".

  • Good point, didn't think of it that way. +1 on your long post last night.

Leave a comment