Audibles From the Long Snapper

Looks Like Omiyale at Left Tackle

From Brad Biggs' column in the Tribune:

Smith seemed to slip Monday when he described it as a "significant hamstring" injury before catching himself and adding, "I mean one that would keep you out of the rest of the game."

If Williams has a tear, he could be sidelined until midseason. If it's a less serious pull, maybe he'll miss a few games. Smith didn't seem to think it would be easier for a lineman to return more quickly than a skill-position player who runs more. 

I'm not smart enough to know why the Bears blocked so much better after Chris Williams left the game with his hamstring injury.  But because of that, I'm just not sure how significant this injury is.  It certainly puts a lot of pressure on Kevin Shaffer, the inevitable starter at right tackle.

Bears Should Make Trade for Vincent Jackson
Rick Morrissey, in one of his better pieces in a long time, ponders the notion of re-thinking expectations for the 2010 season after the surprising 2-0 start. 
For those of us who thought the best thing for the franchise would have been a losing season and the departure of the head coach, we're left to ponder the possibility of a playoff berth and of Lovie not having to put his home on the market.

The truth is this.  The 2-0 start should be the impetus that leads the Bears into making a deal for Vincent Jackson.  Jackson is the perfect Jay Cutler target - a bigger, better version of Earl Bennett.  If the Bears don't pursue Jackson, and allow him to set up shop in Minneapolis, they may indirectly become responsible for reinvigorating a deflated Vikings franchise.  Giving up a second and third round draft choice will seem a light price for a division title.


After Watching the Saints Last Night...
It is very clear that there is not a dominant team in the NFC this season.  The Saints and Packers look to be terrific, offensively, but both face litmus test games this week against division rivals.  People like to speak generally about the NFL.  Teams either are or are not contenders.  It's not how the league works.  Every win will move the Bears closer to the postseason and any postseason team in this conference could find themselves playing for it all in Dallas.   

Comments

Leave a comment
  • first!?

  • Get VJack!??!

    Won't happen...

    "We're all set"

    Let's continue to bench our tallest receiver.

    WE HATE SIZE HERE IN CHICAGO!

    If Lovie has to strain his neck to look a receiver in the eyes, that WR has got to go!

  • In reply to JohnGalt:

    he got benched b/c he was dropping passes.....Martz wanted to send a message.

  • In reply to FQD1911:

    Our shortest receiver made the biggest catch of the season last Sunday.

  • In reply to ImissButkus:

    +1 Trac

  • In reply to Mastodon:

    and he was messing up routes

  • In reply to Bears85Sweetness23:

    Ask Tory Holt about that. I imagine the Rams were messing up routes for a couple of years. Sheesh.

  • In reply to Bears85Sweetness23:

    Interesting Bio on Gary Fencik. Older Bears fans realize the value this guy added to the team during the Payton era. I did not realize he was a 12th round draft pick by the Dolphins as a WR and was aquired by the Bears who moved him to FS. Pretty impressive.

    http://www.bearshistory.com/bearsringofhonor/garyfencik.aspx

  • In reply to ImissButkus:

    Throwing the rock this time of the year is fine and dandy but what are the Bears going to do come November, December when the wind kicks up and our WR's can't feel their fingers? McNiel is definitely worth overpaying for if Williams has a serious injury.

  • In reply to ImissButkus:

    well keeping our first 2 opponents to paltry rushing yards makes me feel pretty good just in case it is bitterly cold. Also, it doesn't get cold in Chicago in November. Dec 5th is in Detroit in a dome, Dec 20th is in Minny in a dome. Patriots in December will be a dogfight no matter what the temp and Green Bay on Jan 2 will be classic Bears Packers weather.

  • In reply to hollywood1:

    exactly. and the key of this week: ADJUSTMENTS! you really don't think Martz would adjust to what's going on?

  • In reply to ImissButkus:

    Come November and December I suspect you'll see a lot more 3 TE sets. We have the perfect personnel for the cold weather on O. Big bastards on the ends that can usually catch and speed to keep people honest. In the heat, you have to play the other way around. When it's cold the line has the advantage because they know where the play is going.

  • In reply to ImissButkus:

    yo 85...check your e-mail (the 1 linked to your ESPN acct)

  • In reply to FQD1911:

    I did. I didn't receive anything.

  • In reply to FQD1911:

    I just want to see our Oline to improve. That's all.

  • In reply to FQD1911:

    Wow, the amateur's at ESPN actually bumped the Bears up from #22 to #12 in the power rankings. I'm shocked they didn't move them down.

  • In reply to FQD1911:

    The queens have fallen all the way to 18th. Ha ha ha. What a bunch of tools. How do you like dem apple's Brett. Ha ha ha.

  • In reply to FQD1911:

    http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/teams/powerchart?team=chi

    Cool toy

  • In reply to Bears85Sweetness23:

    Know who I'm not buying as contenders in the group ahead of us?

    - Bungles

    - Patriots - they're done as a dynasty.

  • In reply to MB30SD:

    Bengals are loaded, Patriots always seem to find a way to pull out a season. Don't forget we're only heading into week 3. There's 4 more weeks left for teams to get their act together.

  • In reply to Bears85Sweetness23:

    18 (6) Vikings 0-2-0 Vincent Jackson, anyone? How about Tarvaris Jackson? (Walker)

    Hahahaha

  • In reply to FQD1911:

    It won't help FQ. Have you seen the game line on our matchup. Your ass is going down.

  • In reply to ImissButkus:

    yea...b/c game lines have ALWAYS been correct. trac...i'm making a trophy case for the stump of your head on monday

  • In reply to FQD1911:

    Moreno and Vick are your two weakest links this week.

  • In reply to ImissButkus:

    u still think so about Vick? and against the Jags? smh...you're done kid.

  • In reply to FQD1911:

    It was worth a try FQ.

  • In reply to FQD1911:

    http://espn.go.com/blog/chicagobears/post/_/id/4666269/power-rankings-wheres-the-bears-love

    GREAT article by Mr. Wright. My fav. line:

    "Just last week, the Bears -- despite a victory over the Detroit Lions -- slipped down a spot to No. 22. Interestingly, this week, the Eagles defeated those same Lions and moved up two spots."

    thus, proves the fact that ESPN is trying to ignore the Bears away

  • In reply to FQD1911:

    Man shit i missed the draft for both leagues im in. The players i got blow dick.

  • In reply to ImissButkus:

    The argument of signing a player to keep him out of your division always seemed stupid to me.

  • In reply to JohnGalt:

    Last night I went into my FF game with FleshnBlood with a 13 point lead. I was playing two players, Colston and Crabtree and he was playing one player, Frank Gore.

    He won the game by 7 points.

    This prompted ESPN FF site to have Crabtree as possibly Fantasy Football's biggest bust. I was appalled watching the Saints do nothing to stop Gore.

    The Niners are like the late 70s Bears, and Gore is their Payton. You know him and Vernon Davis are all they got, and yet they cannot stop them. The Saints suck against the run, to Blogfather's point. That defense is not good.

    On the flipside, the Niners have a vicious D which stopped much of what Brees could do. Only suck-ass special teams play by the Niners gave that game away.

    Not shockingly, the team coached by Samurai probably has the best Mike in the game, easily better than Lewis or any other.

  • In reply to gpldan:

    Woaaaaaa there tiger. I don't know about all that, but as I posted last string, willis and Davis are animals. And without a doubt he's top 5 in the league... with Ray Ray, The Hurt Locker, maybe Pitt's guy (can't remember which of those beasts is actually in the middle), etc... As far as general LBs, Briggsy is most certainly in there.

  • I'm sure this isn't first, but the problem with VJ isn't his talent or the price per se...it's that he is one cocktail away from a yearlong suspension.
    If the Vikings want him, great - he's going to suck draft picks away from them at a time they need to reload the cupboard, and they'll still have the same issues they have now plus one more distraction.
    Harvin won't find a magic migraine cure, Berrian won't find his balls, and AP won't learn how to hold onto the ball. V-Jack without the looming suspension and free agency would be worth a 2nd rounder or even a first and third, but as of right now, under these circumstances, let the Vikings cut their own throats on him.

  • In reply to MikeBrownhadaPosse:

    doh, I meant first rounder or second and third.

  • In reply to MikeBrownhadaPosse:

    I'd spend my time going after McNiel instead of V Jack. Sorry Jeff, I think Jackson would be a bad call at this stage in the game.

  • In reply to ImissButkus:

    +100. RIGHT there with you Trac. Line, line, line.

  • In reply to ImissButkus:

    http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/football/nfl/09/21/jets.edwards.dui.ap/index.html?eref=sihp

    Man these guys are idiots. Hire a fucking driver moron.

  • In reply to MB30SD:

    Dude needs to buy a razor MB.

  • In reply to MB30SD:

    What a tool MB. Either the Bears aren't a surprise 2-0 team or the guy should have changed his headline. Anyone can get a gig as a sports columnist these days.

  • In reply to MB30SD:

    Ok, I lied.

    Wow, how much would we love to have a FS of this calibure: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gHYBYoIfgg

  • In reply to MB30SD:

    He was drafted in the 1st round with the 16th overall pick MB. I'm hoping there will still be great value with the 32nd overall pick next year.

  • In reply to ImissButkus:

    Dolphins and the Texans: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/jerome_bettis/09/20/bus.stops/index.html

    No mention of us. Under the radar gents... until we get a "W" on Monday. Then we'll be outed and the pressure starts to build. Ok, enough spamming for now

  • In reply to ImissButkus:

    Agreed - if we give up draft picks for anybody, it should be McNeil...had Omiyale been a disaster at LT against Ware, maybe they would have pulled the trigger. I don't think it'll happen now, right or wrong.
    I hope Wilf overpays for VJack.

  • In reply to MikeBrownhadaPosse:

    Speaking of "One cocktail away...", Posse, how about that Braylon Edwards? Busted for TWICE the legal limit and he's on probation for some other off-season stupidity! Bye, Bye, Braylon.

  • In reply to Albertintucson:

    Yep - I will never, ever understand why someone making that coin doesn't have a personal driver on retainer. Shit, the league has these guys covered but they must not want Goodell to know whose beds their boots are under.

  • In reply to MikeBrownhadaPosse:

    Especially when you consider how many game checks these morons are giving up for lack of a limo.

  • agreed. V-Jax is going to be too expensive right now. why not wait next year, spend a 3rd round draft pick, and get rid of some of the Peppers/CT/Manu money (and some of Cutty's b/c if he keeps playing like this, he's going to be in that Manning/Brady/E. Manning money threshold). plus, WRs come a dime a dozen; let's see what happens in the draft....that's where you build your dynasties anyway (just ask Pittsburg or B-More)

  • I just think V-Jack is a West Coast offense type receiver. We don't have time to get him up to speed for the last couple games of the year, pay him a shitload and worry that he will screw up resulting in some very easy picks. I would rather let Minny get him and then hire a smoking hot escort to seduce him into a weekend drinking binge that gets him tossed out for the rest of the year. Now that would be a brilliant personnel move.

  • In reply to hollywood1:

    Need a job Johnny?

  • In reply to MB30SD:

    i gave up hooking a long time ago mang.

  • In reply to hollywood1:

    Without Johnny Waffle, there is no prostitution or squirel beer in Chicago.

  • In reply to hollywood1:

    You know you're a fudgepacker fan if:

    1. The Halloween pumpkin on your porch has more teeth than your spouse.

    2. You let your twelve yr old daughter smoke at the dinner table in front of her kids.

    3. You think a woman who is "out of your league" bowls on a different night.

    4. You have to go outside to get something ffrom the fridge.

  • In reply to Crowned:

    Not bad Crown. Witty, clean and true.

  • In reply to Crowned:

    Very nice.

  • In reply to Crowned:

    you know, I like the general concept of the Packers -- community owned, sort of; small town, the Packers is all Green Bay has to hang on to, etc..., but when I see the green and yellow lined up across the blue and orange my lower brain stem kicks into high gear.

    I can't wait for Monday.

  • In reply to Crowned:

    Those turds on here that complain about power rankings are beyond pathetic. They're absolutely MEANINGLESS.

    The win against the cowboys was big no doubt, but you turds seem to forget about the piss poor showing the bears had in week one, in which they needed some horrible technicality to get the win. Come back down to earth a bit. It will only help to ease the blow by season's end when the bears once again fall short.

    Hope your O-line is ready for The Claymaker & co.

  • In reply to MadMaxRockatansky:

    A man wouldn't come on this blog and spout the crap you do. If your team takes care of business Monday night, then come share, but until then piss off. Stop being such a punk. Your post's are worthless dribble that shows your lack of intellect. Why don't you tell us which blog you belong to so we can cut and post your remarks on it to show real Packer fans how much of a twit you really are.

  • In reply to ImissButkus:

    What exactly did I say that wasn't correct, dumb ass? Enlighten me.

    So according the genius that is, Trac... Power rankings mean a lot. The win over the cowboys wasn't big. The win against the lions was as dominating as they come without any technicality saving the bears. You're a fucking moron & that's an understatement.

    A man wouldn't come on this blog and say the crap that I do? WTF! Do you read the stupid shit that litters this blog. Grow a pair, bitch. Or at least let em drop.

    Oh and someone with your 'intellect' would know how to spell the word 'drivel' correctly, you dumb fuck.

  • In reply to MadMaxRockatansky:

    You're such an ass. I could care less about the power rankings. That has absolutely nothing to do with the reason we were even talking about them. Go poke your poodle dude.

  • In reply to ImissButkus:

    That's your retort?

    Chalk up another one...

  • In reply to MadMaxRockatansky:

    I know dictionaries are hard to come by in cheese land so let me help you out.

    http://education.yahoo.com/reference/dictionary/entry/dribble

  • In reply to ImissButkus:

    Try to save face some more... The right word is DRIVEL...

    http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/drivel

  • In reply to MadMaxRockatansky:

    Ha ha ha ha ha

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5yHRunAAeY

  • In reply to ImissButkus:

    Blah, blah, blah...Packers suck.

    I hired a Packer fan this year and they sit right outside my office, so that is a key factor in why Urlacher will decrapitate (Slammin' Salmon, anyone?) Mr. Rodgers and his googly-eye. Seriously, A-Rodge, don't you have health insurance to get that fixed?

  • In reply to MikeBrownhadaPosse:

    This comment almost makes sense.

  • In reply to thebigcheese:

    Seriously, it's like trying to make eye contact with Clark Kellogg. You're a multimillionaire, and you can't get corrective glasses? F-ck it, who would want to see straight in any bar in Green Bay?

  • In reply to thebigcheese:

    I have Brett Farve for trade anybody wanna give me something for him. RB maybe?

  • In reply to thebigcheese:

    OTHER NOTE: Jay Cutler Leads the nfl with a 121 percent passing rating

  • In reply to thebigcheese:

    121 per cent of what? Just kidding.

    Wow, have to wade through a load of cheese just to get a word in these days ... I guess that will stop pretty quickly once we flatline Rodgers and the Fudgers.

    V-Jack is the right size for us, but fails on two counts :

    1. In case no one has noticed, the piggy back is empty .. or at least Angelo's *access* to it is.

    2. Mr. Jackson has a substance abuse problem. If we got rid of Ced and Tank for semi-partially-serious concerns then there's no way in Christmas the Bears are talking to V-Jack. I mean, did we even pick up the phone to talk to Marshall? Think he didn't want to get re-united with Cutler and preferred Henne ?

    I'm with you on the Saints, jeff. Idf you let San Francisco - Alex Smith - march down the field on you, something's up with your defense. I'm not afraid of them so far.

  • In reply to thebigcheese:

    And even if Chris William's hammy isn't serious, it's serious. "Only missing a few games" means coming back and not having been tuned up for a while, it's still half the season with a fried egg at left tackle. I'm prepared to believe he will magically have transformed from poo into a diamond if he pancakes everyone in sight next Monday, but until then my Bear friends ....

  • In reply to MikeBrownhadaPosse:

    Sucktansky would your rather fuck a big block of cheese with Brett Farves face or Aaron Rodgers?

  • In reply to Grizzly559:

    both

  • In reply to ImissButkus:

    is a twit more like a twat, or a tweet?

  • In reply to MadMaxRockatansky:

    so what a/b GB's piss poor showing against the Eagles?

  • In reply to FQD1911:

    Piss poor showing? What the fuck were you watching? You do realize that they were putting a wooping on the eagles with Kolb in the game. Had they not knocked him out then it would've been a massacre. It actually was a blessing in disguise for the eagles losing Kolb. The Packers game planned for Kolb, not Vick. They are 2 completely different QBs but don't let that get in the way of your uninformed remarks.

  • In reply to MadMaxRockatansky:

    Well obviously yo mamma didn't game plan for the douche she gave birth to or she would have taken it up the claymaker.

  • In reply to MadMaxRockatansky:

    Just thinking, I wonder if all the douche's on here are the Blogfather keeping us going or if it's someone from this blog.

    Does anyone on here go to other blogs and really talk shit about the Bear's?

  • In reply to Bears85Sweetness23:

    I highly doubt Jeff would do that 85. Trust me, I can spot a genuine douche when I see one.

  • In reply to ImissButkus:

    So can I, YOU!

  • In reply to Bears85Sweetness23:

    I can assure you that I'm not Jeff, but blogs do have their employees troll their own boards to get hits under anonymous names.

  • In reply to MadMaxRockatansky:

    lol so i guess cursing strengthens your argument huh? and they're called "in-game" adjustments (see Chicago Bears vs. Dallas Cowboys 2 days ago). but, the Packers didn't make any....hence the reason why Vick made the GB defense look like shredded provolone.

  • In reply to FQD1911:

    Yeah, thank God we weren't playing a stud like Shaun Hill, we might have lost that game.

  • In reply to MadMaxRockatansky:

    Hee heee

  • In reply to MB30SD:

    The Packers are overrated you boob. We held your beloved gay pornstar look-alike to pedestrian yards on both occasions last year. The Bears were decimated by injury and had a dickhead for an o-coordinator. Just wait and see the punishment the Bears put on you busters on Monday. We are much improved from last year while Ted Thompson made no significant improvements to your team. We have the team we should of had last year, healthy, and thirsty for blood. Jay Cutler is gonna cornhole your secondary.

  • In reply to MB30SD:

    We've pondered that before '85... same with #16.

    It's pretty inconceivable to me that anyone would waste their life like that. So utterly pointless. I get RogerRoger's tact, read up on what the true fans think/feel and pop in to do a little DD, but what Max does is just douchbaggery at its zenith. Like I said, he was the asshole at your high school who thought bullying the disabled kids made him cool.

  • In reply to MB30SD:

    I wish I had time to moonlight as a Packers douche.

  • In reply to JeffHughes:

    Sorry Jeff, it's just messed up that this guys continues to get on here and just talk shit.

  • In reply to Bears85Sweetness23:

    When I read you fools saying stupid uninformed BS about the Packers and their fans then I will NOT play nice.

    I can play nice, but I let you pricks and your posts dictate whether I play nice or not. More often then not you saps aren't playing nice.

  • In reply to Bears85Sweetness23:

    SuckaTansky would you like a piece of cheese with that wine?

    Im a Bear Fan and just cause of that im basically smarter than you. Only a retard would pick the Packers as a team, I heard it was cause of the bright colors. So therefore, We are right and you are a MAJOR DOUCHE!

  • In reply to Grizzly559:

    I'm sorry, I know I've already been over this, but if you're going to bring intelligence into this then I can't go on without reiterating that you live in fucking Fresno. And you claim it. FAIL.

  • In reply to thebigcheese:

    And your a bitch who likes the packers. I think you should be more mad about your situation. Fresno on other hand is better than any fuckhole town in wisconsin. I think fresno is actually bigger than any city or town in wisconsin. 5th largest city in California, which compared to you would be the biggest city in wisconsin.

  • In reply to thebigcheese:

    SUCKTANSKY SAYS:"eww I like the Packers cause the smell of the cheese reminds me of my boyfriends asshole" haha

  • In reply to thebigcheese:

    Packer Fans= mental retardation

  • In reply to Bears85Sweetness23:

    Your Fanhood is inconcievably lame.

    your picture is pretty sweet though.

  • In reply to JeffHughes:

    Ha.

  • In reply to JeffHughes:

    Somewhere, Pete Rozelle is smiling at his legacy that is NFL Parity.

  • In reply to JeffHughes:

    By the way, watching the game again while doing engineering economy, D.J. was all on his own against D.J. on that first int and he failed. The Cowboy's tried to expolit D.J because he hasn't started before. They were almost sucessful because Miles got open but as we all know, Mr. Tillman knocked him out.

    D.J., lay off the smack

  • In reply to Bears85Sweetness23:

    against Miles. Sorry.

  • In reply to JeffHughes:

    Why? You're moonlighting as a bear douche.

  • In reply to JeffHughes:

    So you don't deny #16?

  • In reply to MB30SD:

    I was thinking more along the lines of haymaker because he knocks QBs the fuck out, but playmaker sounds about right too.

    It's 6'4' 250, give or take a few pounds, but I'm not sure what your point is.

    I only pick on the loud mouth know-nothings like your worthless self. I'm actually a good guy to those who deserve it, trust me.

    If the Pack loses Monday, I'll stop by just because you said so.

  • In reply to MadMaxRockatansky:

    Sure you will max.

    Honestly Max, you can't be a good guy. Seriously, normal dude's don't continue to do what you do. I would never in a million years seek out another teams blog and then go post aggressive smack

  • In reply to MB30SD:

    Your pussy is showing

  • In reply to MadMaxRockatansky:

    http://www.moronail.net/images/stories/dg_pictures/1009/E3ED20EC02DB-1.jpg

  • In reply to MadMaxRockatansky:

    If the Bears win, Max will crawl back in his hole and we won't hear from him. If they lose, he'll be on here relentlessly running his smack.

    Why Jeff puts up with it, I don't know. I'd have banned his account by now. It bores us, it bores me.

  • In reply to MadMaxRockatansky:

    Actually I prefer the douchy name of claymaker. Sounds about right, he is a Fudge Packer.

  • In reply to MadMaxRockatansky:

    I hope your O-line, which in all actuality is worse than our O-line, can block all of our playmakers. I will be honest, I can only think of one player on your team that can play on D and that is your Clay Matthews but I can think of more ways than one that we can get to your qb.

    Urlacher,Pepper's, Harris, Bowman, Anderson, Indojie, Toeania, Pisa, and for all we know our rookies could get to you also.

    You can only brag about the Packer so much, till you realize that you have weaknesses too.

  • In reply to Bears85Sweetness23:

    Didn't mean to cut 85

  • In reply to Joseph:

    And trust me, there are no homers on this blog. We all pretty much agree that we will split the series with you gorgonzola gayrods, each winning at home respecfully.

  • In reply to Bears85Sweetness23:

    Let's hold the smack talk '85. They are a really strong team this year. If we beat them, Max won't be seen again till Packer's week again, where he'll most likely spout off about, "this time we'll smash you".

    The basic truth is that we're a lot better than people thought we'd be so far... including a lot of us (especially me). So, it should be a really good game. They may win, but then people expect that... if we pull off the upset, everyone will have to start changing their opinion of us this season. Bottom line, we

  • In reply to Bears85Sweetness23:

    Talk about Homer.

    Explain to me how the Packers o-line is worse than the bears.

    I know you don't know what you're talking about with the whole Clay is your only good player on D. I would list them, but I'm sure it wouldn't do a thing.

    Signed,

    The reigning DPOY Charles Woodson

  • In reply to MadMaxRockatansky:

    How many sacks did you give up again?

  • In reply to Bears85Sweetness23:

    Not a believer in stopping people from commenting unless they cross certain lines. Max may be a douche but he doesn't offend.

  • In reply to MadMaxRockatansky:

    please don't tell me you:
    1. bought that shirt
    2. cut the sleeves off yet another article of your clothing

  • In reply to Crowned:

    I don't see why our safeties can't do a little of this on Monday night.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zzg0XV1vaJU&p=A48E020AC64A11A2&playnext=1&index=20

  • In reply to ImissButkus:

    The hit that Taylor put on Thiesman to end his career was Karma for all the receiver's he hung out to dry during his career.

  • In reply to ImissButkus:

    That is kinda what Harris did to Roy.

  • In reply to Bears85Sweetness23:

    Am I the only one who thinks Harris knocked himself out for a split second on that hit? I'm guessing I am.

  • In reply to Joseph:

    No you can tell he did. After the hit he just layed on the man.

    Still great hit.

  • In reply to Crowned:

    Batting .750 there champ.

  • In reply to hollywood1:

    They got the Packers ranked 2nd, who the fuck have they played to be given number 2? Eagles? Bills? Saints almost lose to two team that are 0-2 and they are number 1? i watch the Saints game last night and they did not look so much great. If the 49ers didnt turnover the ball twice by the endzone or the safety, the saints would of lost by 10 or more points.

  • In reply to hollywood1:

    Hahahaha... read this idiot's comments back to back for week 1-now. Classic: http://espn.go.com/nfl/team/rankings/_/name/chi/chicago-bears

  • In reply to MB30SD:

    What a chode

  • In reply to hollywood1:

    Just make sure she has the clap johnny.

  • hahahaha... you first SD. Actually, he seems like a really bright, nice kid, and a really good FB player. Just don't think they can pull their shit together 2 yrs in a row... you listening queens?

  • That is an interesting side note Doc. He still made a great catch. Granted, if we didn't have a smurf on the receiving end of that throw, a WR like V Jack just reaches for the ball and probably never has to leave his feet.

  • Great post, sd.

  • Excellent.

  • Sounds like you're speaking from experience with the whole bullying disabled kids. What person in their right mind could come up with that if they didn't actually do it? Seriously.

    I guess paying homage to Gaines, his family, and your whole fan base when he passed is what bad people do, right?

  • In reply to MadMaxRockatansky:

    Only person who comes up with that is the person who actually did it, the person who was made fun of, or the person who watches it happen.

  • In reply to Bears85Sweetness23:

    You're a joke

  • In reply to MadMaxRockatansky:

    By the way, I asked you a question.

    How many sacks did your O-line give up last year?

    Compared to us.

  • In reply to Bears85Sweetness23:

    What does last year have to do with this year?

    A better question is whose offensive line played in a playoff game last year, had a 4,000 yard passer, 1,000 yard rusher, and 2 1,000 yard recievers while allowing 50+ sacks? Not the bears...

    I can play the last year shit too.

    Keep it to this year as I'm sure you have a pot to piss in, but last year is a completely different story...

    Just some words of wisdom for you...

  • In reply to MadMaxRockatansky:

    Guess who had that same amount and wasn't in the playoffs?

    Steelers.

    Dude, You are using the past to prove your going to good this year.

    Your QB said he played horrible in his first game.
    Your running back is gone.
    Your 16 in passing.
    We are 3rd in passing.

  • In reply to Bears85Sweetness23:

    Didn't I say that I didn't want to talk about last year, but some dipshit(you) wanted to even though the stats last year point to the Packers favor.

    You just might be the dumbest poster on this site.

  • In reply to MadMaxRockatansky:

    I gave you all the stats from now.

    You call me dumb

  • In reply to MadMaxRockatansky:

    Only a moron would brag about being 3rd in passing after facing the 30th & 18th ranked passing defenses.

    The bills as of now have a better pass defense than either of your opponents.

    Too easy!

  • In reply to MadMaxRockatansky:

    Only a moron?

    Lol I have to admit, putting up 372 passing yards agasint any team is easy, and then going to our first away game and putting up 277 is just easy.

    Oh btw this is an entirely new offense.

  • In reply to MadMaxRockatansky:

    Then using your twisted logic, what are you doing here because the Fudger's haven't done jack this year. Ooooh, you beat the big bad Bills. Save your smack for Tuesday morning when you wake up to the same sinking feeling you had after the Cardinals put up 51 pts on your vaunted D.

  • In reply to ImissButkus:

    I'm I the one bragging about having the 3rd best passing attack? Thought so.

  • In reply to MadMaxRockatansky:

    Sorry... I meant-- Am I...

  • In reply to MadMaxRockatansky:

    Also... You guys are bragging about winning a game against he Lions that any person in their right mind would know was a gift wrapped by a HORRIBLE technicality.

    Good god are you people delusional.

  • In reply to MadMaxRockatansky:

    We'll see. Come back Tuesday morning after you call in sick for work.

  • In reply to MadMaxRockatansky:

    They almost beat the eagles, and they play the Vikings this week.

    If they lose to the Vikings will see the light as we do that the Lion's are way better now?

  • In reply to MadMaxRockatansky:

    hey Fucktansky. why are you here? I mean not in a sense of your purpose in life, for we all understand that things do crawl out from under rocks once in a while to rear their ugly mug, but why are you on this blog rather than a Packer Blog. It is hard to understand your purpose to go on your arch enemies blog and write things. I just find it hard to fathom, I mean it would be like hitting on your cousin and then going home to fuck you sister. Oh..shit I just figured your purpose. Was it your family filmed in the movie Deliverance?

  • In reply to nicholsra:

    You bear fans open your mouth & the twisted shit that goes on in your brains comes to the forefront. Seek help ASAP. SERIOUSLY.

    What normal person comes up with that? Scary.

  • In reply to MadMaxRockatansky:

    DDDDOOOO IIIII NNNNEEEEEEEEEEDDDDD TTTTTTOOOOOOO WWWWWWRRRRRRRIIIIIIITTTTTTTTEEEEEE SSSSSSSSSLLLLLLLOOOOOOOWWWWWWWWWWWEEEEEEEERRRRRRRR?

  • In reply to nicholsra:

    No. You need to keep that shit to yourself or you'll find yourself in a padded room wearing a straight jacket, if you're not careful.

  • In reply to MadMaxRockatansky:

    Don't you guys have your own website? Oh, that's right, Packers fans can't put three w's together.

  • In reply to MadMaxRockatansky:

    Sure dude. If that makes you feel better about being an ass.

  • In reply to MB30SD:

    I really feel sorry for you. I truly do.

  • In reply to MadMaxRockatansky:

    Pepper's is great in the run game. He just dominates in every phase. He was doubled a lot. Tommie was doubled every now and then. When he was the only player who played was Toenaina. That man can play.

  • In reply to MadMaxRockatansky:

    Max..come on dude. Ok. Since you are a little quiet I can help you.

    You gave up 50 sacks to our 35.

    Ouch? Yeah, that's what you qb thinks every night because he is getting pounded more than your sister did in the 9th grade because she developed early.

    Your O-line is just worse than ours.

    Your QB bailed you out a lot of times and so did your running back by making things happen even though the play was already over.

  • In reply to Bears85Sweetness23:

    The more you talk the more you show your delusional mindset.

    You didn't even watch a Packer game last year other than the 2 against the bears, did you? It's obvious.

    Did you Joseph really say that there aren't homers on here.

  • In reply to MadMaxRockatansky:

    The Bear's were not the only team I watched that raped your qb.

    Both of our teams are going to have to draft some new o-linemen.

    Did you even watch more than two games the bear's got to you but come on , you oline sucked last year and they are the reason you lost in the playoffs.

    If you would have had a oline you might have farther.

  • In reply to Bears85Sweetness23:

    Did you watch the last 8 games last year when the Packers gave up less than 10 sacks, guess not...

  • In reply to MadMaxRockatansky:

    How did you lose your last game that year?

  • In reply to Bears85Sweetness23:

    Well?

  • In reply to Bears85Sweetness23:

    A sack fumble.

    I gotta throw the blind dog a bone from time to time, so he doesn't starve...

  • In reply to MadMaxRockatansky:

    If they would have been a better blocking unit then you would have gone farther. I am telling you, draft more o-linemen and you will do better.

    The same goes for the bear's. When Jay can put up a passer rating of over 100 we are 17-0. The best way to do that is to block for him.

  • In reply to Bears85Sweetness23:

    not we, Jay Cutler's team. My fault.

  • In reply to MadMaxRockatansky:

    Mr. Rodgers is going down. You have personally attacked one of the only guys that tried to give you respect by having dialogue with you. I sure hope your team has a backup quarterback capable of pulling out a Vick like performance cause you're gonna need one.

  • In reply to MadMaxRockatansky:

    MikeBrowninDAposse dude thanks for trading braylon edwards cause this morning he was busted on DWI. haha fuckin a man.

  • In reply to Grizzly559:

    Oh shit, was that you?

  • In reply to Grizzly559:

    Jesus Christ Jeff, does devolving your blog into a big shit storm of idiocy cross this imaginary line you have? Because that's what has just happened.

  • In reply to Bears85Sweetness23:

    Dude. The bears suck. It's not even subjective. They just suck. Get over it.

  • In reply to MadMaxRockatansky:

    FAIL!

  • Priceless Doc.

  • Do you realize that responding is engaging me or are you too stupid to realize that?

  • Your pussy is showing, too.

  • Beautiful story! love it.

Leave a comment