Roads get fixed by state, but no capital dollars for CTA projects

While highways and schools haven gotten their share of a $31 billion capital program passed by the state last year, mass transit hasn't gotten squat. That's what Greg Hinz reminds us in a blog post this week.

The CTA is supposed to get about $900 million of $1.8 billion total set aside for it plus Metra and Pace. As Hinz reports:

IDOT Secretary Gary Hannig offers a variety of explanations as to
why straphangers so far have been left hanging. Things will change soon,
he says.

Local transit leaders, hoping that's true, are unwilling to go on the
record with their concerns, lest those birds in the bush fly away.

But overall, it's just a question of priorities. And, in Illinois,
roads are a higher priority than trains and buses. You'd think the
Republicans were in charge.

Do remember that when Mr. Quinn asks for your vote this November.

According to Mr. Hannig, part of the problem is that while roads are
funded by "dedicated" revenues -- gas taxes, license fees and the like --
transit projects get funded by general state revenues, like sales and
income taxes, which lately have been in the dumper.

Thus "cash flow" becomes a problem -- for transit. I guess the money that
goes for transit is a different color than the money that goes for

Then there's the fact that instead of giving money directly to the CTA
and Metra and Pace, the Legislature gave it to IDOT to administer.

Hannig did tell Hinz that millions of dollars in projects would be announced by the end of the year. Meanwhile, more mortar falls from broken-down viaducts. We transit users should no longer be considered second-class citizens.


Leave a comment
  • The more confusing part, which you didn't pick up is:

    "Fifteen months later, roads and schools have received big initial allotments of the billions of new state bonds that have been or are about to be sold.
    But transit? The thing that millions of us Chicago-area folks rely on to get to work every day?

    Not one penny. Zip

  • The money is appropriated in the two capital bills.

    Quinn demonstrated the he's not "going to give any money to transit," despite having said that he signed the capital bill, giving me the inference that he believes that transit riders are not important, except for the ones who get free rides.

    So, glg, keep your knee jerk reaction and the status quo.

  • I can't believe this. I am seriously to the point where I am considering voting for Bill Brady in the fall. His stance on so many issues is reprehensible. But I simply don't think I can allow this misrule by the Illinois Democratic Party to continue. And at least Brady likes Amtrak . . . maybe he can be sold on the idea that if his Bloomington district gets improved intercity rail, Chicago ought to get its transit bonds.

    Anyone know how Rich Whitney is doing?

Leave a comment