Top 10 Qualities to Look for in an Attorney

There are thousands of lawyers in Illinois. Don't just pick a name from the phone book (or the internet). There is no such thing as the best lawyer, but there are definitely some that are the worst. Here are some qualities to help you narrow the field.

1.      Practice area. Find someone who practices in the area in which you need help. Injured? Find an injury attorney. Bankruptcy? Find a bankruptcy attorney. This may seem obvious, but there are attorneys who will take any case that comes through the door. It can mean that they don't have enough experience any one area.

2.      Experience. Ten years of experience is a good benchmark, but there is no magic number. Again, those years of experience should be in the area of law relevant to your problem.

3.      Location. For most cases, you'll want an attorney who spends a lot of time in the courthouse where your case is being heard. They should know all the local rules, be familiar with the judges and their quirks, and have a good reputation among the other attorneys. All of these things can work in your favor.

4.      Reputation. If an attorney is respected by colleagues, judges and the other people they deal with professionally, it's a good sign. These relationships come in handy when negotiating on behalf of clients or arguing a case in court.

5.      Resources. Are they part of a large firm? This isn't always a requirement, but if you are involved in a complex and expensive case (medical malpractice is a good example), you want an attorney with a lot of resources. They should be able to pay the costs of your lawsuit upfront and not be tempted to settle because they need to get paid. If going to trial is in your best interest, you want an attorney who has the time, money and support staff to follow through.

6.      Success. The definition of success differs from case to case. Not every case ends with one party winning and the other losing; often there is a compromise. In the end, success depends on whether the client was pleased with the outcome. Client recommendations and referrals from other attorneys are a good way to find this out.

7.      Communication. Attorneys are notorious for never calling back. Don't just accept this as the way it is. There are plenty of attorneys who call you back or answer an e-mail within 24 hours. Honestly, I think that should be the norm. Talk to previous clients about an attorney's communication style. Ask the attorney how they keep in touch and when you can expect to hear from them.

8.      Client reviews. If possible, talk to some previous clients for some insight. While the attorney can tell you about their fees, experience and past success, a previous client will be able to answer questions about whether they are trustworthy, kind and willing to explain legal issues in a way that makes sense to a non-lawyer.

9.      Sensitivity. Some areas of law require sensitivity, like family law. If you get the feeling that your attorney doesn't care, they probably don't. In areas of law that involve a lot of emotion and personal conflict, attorneys can easily burn out. Keep looking for someone who can show you some empathy.

10.  Your gut feeling. Always interview an attorney before hiring them. Write down questions you want to ask if you think you'll forget. Ask about their resume, but also about how they handle cases like yours and what their strategy would be. Ask about fees and billing. Ask about communications. And in the end, trust your gut. If it doesn't feel right, keep looking. You do not have to hire the first attorney you meet.

 

 

Type your email address in the box and click the "create subscription" button. My list is completely spam free, and you can opt out at any time.

Filed under: Uncategorized

Comments

Leave a comment
  • As far as reputation, what's the prospective client supposed to do, interview other lawyers to find out what they think about Joseph Blaugh?

    I don't know about lawyers, but I know doctors when you ask them about any colleague say "I'm sure he/she will serve you well." It doesn't matter what specialty, or even if you tell them that what the doctor in question is prescribing doesn't work.

    Getting back to your workers' compensation post a couple of days ago, another fallacy, besides search Gary for lawyers is that you searched Google. Google is good for many things, but not finding lawyers; Findlaw and lawyers.com are better. Punching in Merrilville and and Workers' Compensation in Findlaw comes up with 9 listings in Lake and Porter Counties. lawyers.com comes up with 6 in Merrilville, but if you then search Munster you get another 4.

    Maybe I should disclose that I have a business relationship with the publisher that owns one of them, but prefer the other. Basically, there are only two publishers in the legal sphere, anyway.

  • 1. Findlaw is a joke IMO. It's people who pay to be listed and the last time I looked up a lawyer friend in Wheaton, they had her working in a job she was last involved with in around 2003.

    2. Since you seem to have a lot of time, call all those alleged work comp firms in Indiana and tell them you have carpal tunnel and from working in Hammond as a secretary and then report back how many will take your case. I bet you will find that this is not the practice focus for any of them. Findlaw routinely lists firms in practice areas the lawyer doesn't mostly concentrate on.

    3. As for lawyer rep, there are a lot of ways to check this out. 1. Go to the ARDC website and see if they've been disciplined. 2. Google the lawyer's name and go ten pages deep to see what people are saying about them. 3. Ask for references. 4. If you know attorneys in other practice areas, ask them if they have heard of the lawyer or if they can ask around.

  • In reply to Findgreatlawyers:

    Yeah. I'm really going to spend my time making a bunch of fraudulent calls to lawyers in Indiana.

    I'm also going to trust Yelp, to which Google refers. Maybe the ARDC will tell me if the lawyers drained their client trust accounts or were convicted, but not much else. I did mention the ask other attorneys point. If, like the doctors, one is going to say that another is incompetent, that will be a surprise.

    I also said that I preferred only one of the two sites. Maybe that gives you a hint of the area in which I work. However, since I am an independent contractor, I really don't have the time to engage in the calls, and, obviously, am not eligible for Indiana workers' comp., even if I have carpal tunnel from keeping Chicago Now bloggers afloat (see my post in Byrne's blog).

    BTW, you haven't answered my question about, once the Illinois Workers' Comp. bill was posted by you, what really is wrong with it, especially since the "insurance company picking the doctor" point you made was not in the bill.

  • In reply to Findgreatlawyers:

    The answer is that it is/was a fluid bill, with testimony going on as late in to the session as the tax debate and the story was that if the dems got the tax increase the GOP would get the right to have the insurance company choose the doctor and limit the value of cases. I haven't heard this a.m. what shook out on this last night.

Leave a comment