Tenants to CHA: Scrap drug-testing proposal

Tenants to CHA: Scrap drug-testing proposal

Chicago Housing Authority officials and public housing residents have been at odds for years over policies created under the Plan for Transformation. While the CHA maintains that stricter lease requirements -- like mandatory good neighbor classes and a one-strike eviction rule -- for those living in subsidized units is key to creating harmony in new mixed-income communities, residents see the policies as downright discriminatory. And the CHA's latest proposal -- the topic of discussion at a public hearing tonight -- has become yet another source of tension.

The agency is proposing to drug test all adult public housing residents and to eliminate the "innocent tenant defense" clause, which would allow CHA to evict residents when a relative or guest is arrested for using drugs or acting violently. Essentially, the latter would take away tenants' avenue to appeal such evictions. (Check out the amendments here.)

Yesterday, members of the Kenwood Oakland Community Organization, public housing residents and their neighbors gathered in front of CHA headquarters to draw attention to the proposal, which will be up for public debate tonight. In their eyes, drug testing infringes on their 4th Amendment right to be shielded from unreasonable search and seizure. And by taking away their right to appeal evictions, Joseph Peery, a former Cabrini-Green public housing tenant who now lives in a mixed-income development, says "Now we're going from guilty until proven innocent to guilty with no chance of being proven innocent - just guilty." Click through to watch his and others' remarks:

The amendment to the leasing rules would not apply to homeowners of CHA mixed-income areas. That double standard is seen by many - including the American Civil Liberties Union -- as a form of profiling, according to a Chicago Sun-Times article.

But CHA spokeswoman Kellie O'Connell-Miller tells the newspaper that people living in the developments are asking for help quelling crime. "We're trying to tighten up our lease with some of these issues," she said. "Drug dealers won't come where there are no buyers. If you remove the folks who are interested in drugs, hopefully it will remove some of the problems."

If the CHA board adopts the measure, it will then go to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development for approval.

Check back for our dispatch from tonight's hearing.

 

--Alexis Pope, Dylan Cinti and Angela Caputo

Comments

Leave a comment
  • I have a prodigious and thriving disdain for the ACLU just as much as the next guy, but this mandatory drug-testing thing is as sketchy as me standing at the back of women's only spinning class.

  • 1. The United States Constitution is an endurable document, and is very clear concerning fundamental rights.

    The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America commands that "[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons . . . against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated[.]"

    2. Under well settled law, tany drug-testing regime mandated laws by the City of Chicago's Public Housing Authority's Board of Commissioners or Department or an executive order is a governmental search implicating the Fourth Amendment.

    See Skinner v. Ry. Labor Execs.

  • YES... You go CHA!!! It's about time we started tightening the belt on freeloaders who use my tax dollars to buy drugs after receiving money from corner stores who trade $50 link cards for $40 cash! Get those s**t heads off my tax dollar paid property!

    Further, if there are any buildings that have drug abuse or drug dealing in them, the Federal Government should have the right confiscate the property. Just imagine how beautiful are neighborhoods could become if all that real estate went into responsible private owners hands!

  • You fully match our expectation and the selection of our data. buy ayahuasca online

Leave a comment