
Michelle L'Amour
Guest post by Ammie Brod"If it weren't for you we wouldn't be sitting here naked. Well, we might be, but we'd only be reading to each other."
And with that, world-renowned burlesque dancer
Michelle L'amour closes the fifth
Naked Girls Reading--thrown by L'amour and members of her Lavender Cabaret in Chicago's West Loop. L'amour is, naturally, naked when she says this. So are the five other women perched on the couch and chair that sit in front of her tastefully decorated studio filled with literature and artwork relating to the art of burlesque. I--and the forty or fifty others in the audience--have just spent the past two hours listening to--and watching--these beautiful women read great works of literature in nothing but stilettos and elaborate hair ornaments as we munched on butter cookies and sipped glasses of wine.
Studio L'amour serves as a location for burlesque and yoga classes, bachelorette parties that include striptease instruction and bridal gift bags (your very own feather boa and set of pasties included), and, most recently, Naked Girls Reading. There is, of course, a story behind all of this. L'amour was reading at home naked when her husband came in and caught her in the act, and they realized that they were both so excited by it that they began discussing a naked reading event. "He can't be the only one that finds it beautiful," she told me. The evening is exactly what the name implies: girls, naked, reading aloud. Last month the emphasis was on freedom of speech, with texts ranging from Lolita and historical accounts of George Washington's wrongdoings to the Declaration of Independence. This month's event,
Friday, September 4th from 7-10pm at Studio L'Amour (939 W Randolph St), is "
So you wanna be a naked girl?" If you've ever had desires to read in your birthday suit, NOW is the time.
L'amour's exiting lines, while amusing, also hit what seems to
be the crux of these events: These girls love their literature, and
they are thrilled to bring it to a larger audience; even if we, the
audience, weren't there, they'd still be reading--possibly without any
clothes.
I was admittedly rather nervous before my first visit
to the series last month. I'm not sure why: I love reading, and I love
naked women, so what was my problem? I think I was worried that I
would come away feeling let down, that the night wouldn't live up to my
expectations and I would end up at home in bed thinking about how I had
wasted an evening hearing bad erotic poetry, the only saving grace
being that I'd also seen some nipples. Nothing ruins an experience
faster than hoping for greatness and being handed mediocrity.
But
the Naked Girls proved to be anything but mediocre. That first
evening, I was treated to readings and discussions of interconnected
poems by Ted Hughes and Sylvia Plath as well as works by
Sharon Olds
and
Frank O'Hara; the only obvious evidence of erotica was a few dirty
limericks played for laughs. I was impressed by the level of literary
acumen (how often does the average audience in any venue get a lecture
on poetic analysis?) and by how excited each reader was to take her
turn. As each girl read, she leaned forward and her body reflected the
tense arch of her chosen poem. I couldn't take my eyes off of them,
and it wasn't just because they were naked.
I've
always loved words. When I was five years old I briefly refused to
learn to read, but that's only because I adored being read aloud to and
I sensed that that part of my life would gradually fade when I began
carrying the load of translation on my own. Once I began, though, it
was love at first stuttered run-through of
Patrick's Dinosaurs (my
first solo read), and it's all been downhill since. I appreciate the
feeling of holding a heavy book between my hands as well as the
lightness of a slim volume of poetry, the dusty communal smell of
libraries along with the tang of a newly printed text, the glow that a
perfectly articulated sentence leaves in my mind after I read it. I'm
a sucker for a beautiful turn of phrase.
I won't deny, however,
that the "reading" aspect of Naked Girls Reading was only part of what
initially drew me in. And because I, a fairly literary-minded and
selectively voyeuristic audience member, was so intrigued by the nudity
factor of the evening I immediately questioned it. Was this a ploy, a
hook to get people into a show that really had very little to do with
nudity? Were the Naked Girls and the Reading two separate parts of the
same event? And why exactly was I there? I couldn't decide whether I
was a rubbernecker, there to ogle the exposed female flesh in front of
me, or a literary snob, turning up my nose at the possibly gratuitous
nudity so that I could hear passionate readings of poetry and prose.
Was I possibly some complicated amalgamation of these two extremes, a
person who could appreciate both the physical and literary aesthetics
of gorgeous naked women reading great works of literature?
Um, yes. The latter, please.

Ammie Brod, Mina Mechante, Anna Pulley and Ellie Kaufman at NGR's Poetry Night
At
the first Naked Girls Reading five months ago, I was told by numerous
performers, the nudity wasn't the issue--after all, these are
professional burlesque dancers. But they all agreed that they were
terrified to read aloud to an audience. "It made us way more naked and
vulnerable," L'amour said.
They've apparently gotten over it.
By last Friday's event, the readers seemed not only comfortable with
their literary choices but also truly excited by what they were doing.
In sets of two or three, the girls would disappear behind the screen at
the front of the room, removing the lingerie they wear between acts
before emerging naked and settling on the couch to reveal their
literary choices. The works ranged from poetry to history to prose,
but the overarching theme that emerged proved to be one of
vulnerability and truth and the catharsis that comes from the revealing
of these personal emotions. This was made explicit in one of
Greta
Layne's choices,
Paolo Coelho's Eleven Minutes, a reading that explored
the relationship of pain and sacrifice to love. "We seek out pain and
sacrifice and then feel pure," she read, focusing on the renunciation
of all that is important in order to gain clarity and truth. Stripping
yourself bare, getting onstage and reading works that are close to your
heart and opening yourself to criticism and judgment, can become a way
to share a deeper purity of thought and self, to learn and teach of new
and different ways to be.
I sympathize. While I've long been a
die-hard fan of the written word when others were the ones producing
it, I'm relatively new to the craft of writing; it nearly always feels
precarious, if not dangerous, to let my words out into the world for
others to see and, quite possibly, dislike. When I write a sentence
with the intent of showing it to friends, acquaintances, strangers, it
feels all too often as though I'm baring my heart and waiting for
someone to rip it from my chest. But even as I wait for the axe to
fall, it's become clear that the risk is infinitely worth any harm that
might come from the struggle. For what could feel better, purer, more
honest than creating something and sharing it to others? We survive by
the thoughts we share and the connections that form from our own
honesty, and a life lived otherwise would be truly empty.
With
this particular connection, it finally became clear to me why the
nudity is not only important but perhaps necessary to this event. In
one of L'amour's readings, a text about strip clubs and burlesque from
a 1950 copy of Chicago Confidential, she highlighted the distinction
between two very different forms of revealing the body: the difference
between being nude and naked is the difference between having nothing
on and taking everything off. The girls are not just nude; they are
naked, exposed, revealing their intellectual and emotional selves to an
audience of friends and family and complete strangers. It is one thing
to read from
Lolita (as
Mina Mèchante did, wearing only those classic
heart-shaped sunglasses made famous in Kubrick's film), and entirely
another to read from the introduction to the annotated edition,
analyzing Nabokov's magnificent work for an audience that may or may
not have read the original text. To take such a risk requires belief
in words, in exposure and its relationship to truth.

Mimi First and Mina Mechante
Mèchante
herself had this to say:
"This is really what Naked Girls Reading is
about; showing people that women can be both fiercely intelligent as
well as proud of their sexuality. When people believe that the mind
and body are binaries, they have a tendency to think that all high art
is confined to the realm of the intellect and don't see the role that
sexuality plays in all great art. These people may think that the
nudity in our shows is just a gimmick and only used to get people in
the door, and while it may do that as well what keeps people enthralled
is the mixture of mind and body, sex and intellect, and the fact that
they do work together."
And it does work. Kim Schultz, a
first-time attendee (she surprised her male partner with tickets to the
event, not telling him what was in store until they arrived that
evening) told me that she never attended artistic or literary events
like this, but that she would most likely be coming next month and
bringing friends. Another audience member, in the closing question and
answer session, said simply "It's so heartening to know that people
still read." The message is making it through. In the final reading
of the evening, a piece not only read but written by
Greta Layne, she
told us this: "The revolution began in nakedness." And indeed, perhaps
it has.
Related:
1 Comment
bellaco said:
mmm very nice
Leave a Comment?
What your comment will look like:
said: