
Katy Costello, Gena Medema and Kathy Hilgart of Elmhurst, IL celebrate another Blackhawks win of the season!
Something that has been discussed all season long with the
Chicago Blackhawks is the dawn of the new
"bandwagon fan" entering the gates of the United Center this season. We have all seen it before, with success comes a new legion of fans that spend money on jerseys they normally would not wear in public and enjoy the party atmosphere that winning brings to any arena. These "fans" are usually looked upon with a stink-eye by the "fan base" that has been to through the dark days of the franchise.
You know the type.......
"I was there when Mark Bell manned the left wing and Michael Leighton was a Blackhawk" types.
We all know one "true fan" that is irate the "bandwagon fan" is invading his territory and rooting for a team that he/she just started keeping up with last month.
The true test however is can the Blackhawks keep that "bandwagon fan" around, or will the sport of hockey go back to where it is at in every other United States NHL city?
Of course time will tell the answer to this question, but with the recent rise of the Blackhawks in town you could say that they are as popular as the
Bulls or even the
White Sox. Do I believe that the Blackhawks will rise to the top of Chicago sports like they were back in the 50's and 60's....
absolutely not.
Unfortunately for
John McDonough and
Rocky Wirtz, the mistakes of
"Dollar Bill" alienated an entire generation of Blackhawk fans because the games simply did not matter in the Chicago sports scene. As bad as the Blackhawks were
(voted worst franchise in sports 2006), the hard work and dedication to winning has had an immediate impact on not only the team itself but also the image of the team/sport in the Chicago sports landscape.
I cannot imagine the last time I saw so many Blackhawks jerseys and hats worn around town and to other sporting events. Putting on the
Cubs this weekend there were mentions of the Blackhawks by the national broadcast of
Joe Buck and
Tim McCarver on FOX who used to carry NHL playoff games in the late 90's with
FoxTraxx (the glowing puck).
The winning, the party-like atmosphere at the "Madhouse on Madison", the feel good of a worst to first team possibly winning sports greatest trophy is all great to witness. However the true test of
John McDonough and
Rocky Wirtz is can they keep the "bandwagon fan" interesting in a sport that the country seems to not have any interest in?
It's a proven fact that hockey is fourth among the four major sports in America
(NFL/MLB/NBA/NHL). Looking at the television ratings is a great gauge that the country simply does not care for hockey like it does the other sports.
2009 World Series - Averaged 11.7 Rating (courtesy of baseball-almanac.com)
2009 NBA Finals - Averaged 8.4 Rating (courtesy of NBA.com)
2009 Super Bowl - 46.4 Rating (courtesy of USAToday.com)
2010 Stanley Cup Finals Game 1 - 2.8 Rating (courtesy of tvbythenumbers.com)
Although those national numbers may seem depressing to some, the local ratings for the
Blackhawks/Flyers game one was a true winner. A 16.8 rating for the Chicago market is exciting to see, but according to
Phil Rosenthal only pales in comparison to
Bears/Vikings Monday Night Football 12.0 ratings nationally. Say what you will about television ratings and how much they matter to you as a fan, but this is a realistic way of tracking how much the country and Chicago care about the sports they watch.
Can the Blackhawks keep the bandwagon fan around, or will the long time suffering Blackhawk fan who shouts
"I lived through the days of Eric Daze" indeed get his wish? If recent history is any indicator, the Blackhawks better continue to win. Let's use the 2005 World Series Champion
Chicago White Sox for example.
In
2005, the
Chicago White Sox averaged 28,923 fans a game which was a 4,000+ increase over the previous season and the highest average per game since the strike year of 1994. The World Series brought new people into the building for the next season where the Sox averaged over 36,511 per game which was the highest per game attendance average since the inception of NEW Comiskey Park in 1991. However since 2006 the average attendance has continued to drop year after year back to below what the average was in 2005.
2005 - 28,923
2006 - 36,511
2007 - 33,140
2008 - 30,877
2009 - 28,199
In 2010 through 24 home games, the White Sox are averaging just over 23,000 per game.
Using these figures, it's easy to point out the people who came out for a winner in 2005 did indeed stick around for 2006 but it seems the "die-hards" who shunned the "bandwagoners" back then have indeed gotten their wish of them going away.
I will say that if the Blackhawks do indeed hoist Lord Stanley's Cup this season the boost for the team into 2010-2011 will indeed be huge. The question however is with the sport of hockey as
insignificant as it is nationally, if the Blackhawks do not win in 2010-2011, how many of the "bandwagon fans" will stick around for the days of
"Andrew Ladd and Jordan Hendry?" As well as the "Red Rising" and "One Goal" has gone for
John McDonough, this is the start of his true test as President of the
Chicago Blackhawks. Marketing a winner in a sport that has very little interest and keep it viable in a city that is flooded with other options. Can
John McDonough erase the mistakes of Blackhawks past and aim higher than hockey's ultimate prize?
Once "One Goal" is achieved......the "Next Goal" is making this city care about hockey like they do the other options. To me, John will have to do the impossible.
-
RoCk Rock Mamola is the Associate Producer of The Mully And Hanley Morning Show and co-host of The Joe O And Rock Show on WSCR 670AM The Score
You can follow The Mully And Hanley Morning Show at twitter.com/mullyhanley
You can follow The Joe O And Rock Show at twitter.com/joeoandrockshow
1 Comment
JDL said:
I don't think many dyed in the wool Hawk fans are giving much thought to the fan bandwagon. This is something we've waited a long, long time for why worry about that? And I don't know why you single out Daze. He had some good years on some really bad Hawk teams and played through terrible back problems. What we all lived through was Bill Wirtz and his drinking buddy Bob Pulford.
And I keep seeing a continuing thread that wants to compare the Hawks with the Bears. Trying to somehow diminish what the Hawks organization has accomplished. The Bears get two full pages of coverage for mini-camp even as the Hawks are in the Stanley Cup Playoffs. The NFL is in its' own marketing universe and likely to stay there forever. Even Michael McCaskey couldn't screw that up, although he did try. The NFL is made for tv. It's the perfect sport for it. Hockey is a game best appreciated live, in arena. That's never going to change and whenever the NHL under Bettman has tried be like football or basketball it has been a flop.
The Hawks in a Stanley Cup Final. I'm going to stay right in this exact moment, up 2-0, game 3 tonight in Philly. Right here, right now.
Roll Hawks.
Leave a Comment?
What your comment will look like:
said: