Posted Feb. 18 at 1:50 p.m.
After watching, re-watching, cringing and then re-watching this video, I have to say it gives new meaning to fare collection. What is depicted in this video is reprehensible, and appears to be yet another black eye on the Chicago police department. (Warning, per the Trib's word, this vid is graphic and profane.)
Done cringing yet? Now answer this: Why would an officer scream, curse at and physically attack a man over some pathetic bus fare? Is that $2.25 really worth that kind of reaction? Making matters worse, this video seems to depict an officer so comfortable in his actions that the scrutiny of other riders doesn't stop him one bit.
Perhaps he didn't get the memo that that there is an onboard camera on every bus. Or maybe he is still using a SkyPager circa 1990 and doesn't realize modern technology could allow an apparent outside party to capture this craziness on video.
I had no idea Chicago police officers were so invested in fare collection. From what I've observed, the uniformed folk board and disembark CTA buses at such speed, they don't have time to regulate too much of anything. I don't blame them, as I'm sure they are pressed for other matters, but this dude comes off as a Transit Terminator.
Perhaps the agency's budget woes -- also top news today-- could push even "Officer Friendly" here over the edge.
3 Comments
T M Smith said:
Careful. This news has not at all been well received by Chicago's finest. In their off hours they seem to be scouring the internet for any glimmer of sympathy for the "perp", offering (hopefully empty) big-talk threats. The guy who shot the vid had to remove it from YouTube due to such threats. I hope it is re-posted soon.
Andy said:
Why is it that the criminal is being called the victim? Someone called the police because the guy didn't pay his fare right? Why do you condone the actions of a criminal? There is a fare that needs to be paid by all passengers of the buss correct? How come there are no comments about what the passenger did? Shameful story all the way around
A said:
Yeah the "perp" should have paid, but it was obvious that the "perp" was drunk. Furthermore, the "officer" had no reason to respond like he did. The "officer" was more interested in ruffing up the "perp" than taking him off the bus or arresting him. If I were the cop, I would have called it in and verbally placed him under arrest and then attempt to cuff him. Not beat him up and talk tuff
Leave a Comment?
What your comment will look like:
said: