Tuesday, March 24, 2009 -- 6:42 p.m.
After reading "Animal, Vegetable, Miracle," I went in a similar, yet very different direction: "In Defense of Food: An Eater's Manifesto." Yes, again with the food stuff.
Here's an except from the New York Times' review:
Goaded by “the silence of the yams,” [Michael] Pollan wants to help
old-fashioned edibles fight back. So he has written “In Defense of
Food,” a tough, witty, cogent rebuttal to the proposition that food can
be reduced to its nutritional components without the loss of something
essential. “We know how to break down a kernel of corn or grain of
wheat into its chemical parts, but we have no idea how to put it back
together again,” he writes.
Pollan wrote "Defense" partially in response to his previous book, "The
Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals," which focuses
more on where our food comes from. He follows food we eat from the
source to its meal to describe our relationship with the food we eat.
In "Defense," Pollan talks about what we should be eating. His belief: "Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants." Don't worry, I'm not giving it all away. He is--in the first paragraph of the book.
I consider myself fairly well-informed when it comes to food and nutrition. So I was really happy to find a completely different perspective in Pollan's book from any I had really encountered before. I don't agree with all of it, but the fresh way in which he presents information offers a different view of the Western diet and how we got where we are today.
What I find most fascinating is the look at Americans' focus on specific nutrients--the components of the food we eat. Not only does looking at food as fat, calories, carbohydrates, vitamins, fiber, etc., help give us an excuse to eat whatever we please, it also gives the food industry a way to get you to buy their products.
How? That sugary cereal apparently has whole grains, and you know whole grains are good for you. Therefore, it's good for you. Huh? Yeah, that's how we now think. And we've all been guilty of it. So instead of eating actual whole grains, or whatever the nutrient might be, we find things we like that happen to tout something we're looking for.
I assure you, Pollan explains "nutritionism" better than I do. So much so that I highly recommend you read it.