Sponsored by:

Chicago budget cuts hit recycling program

user-pic
carts.jpg

Tribune file photo



Parts of the recycling program are among Mayor Daley's latest list of proposed budget cuts for the upcoming year, according to a story by the Sun-Times.

Before even reading the story, my reaction to the headline alone was one filled with lots of choice words for our supposedly green mayor.


In addition to the fact that there's no money in the proposed 2010 budget for continuing the roll-out of the blue-cart recycling program, some households would have recycling pickup every third week instead of every other week.

That means the already overflowing carts will be in fantastic condition by the time they get around to picking it up.

Granted, the proposal says "some of the 240,000 households," not all, but in Daley speak, that generally means most, in my opinion.

"We're just looking for creative ways to expand the program, but not commit more resources to it [by] just working more efficiently," Budget Director Eugene Munin said Wednesday.

Munin said Streets and Sanitation Commissioner Tom Byrne "suspects they don't need to be picking up [recycled] garbage every other week" in "some areas of the city.

Obviously they haven't been to Lakeview ...

I know I don't run a city, and it's got to be hard to find places to cut spending in order to make up for a $500 million shortfall. But come on now.Most other large, metropolitan cities manage to figure out a way to do it, and so do many smaller communities.

Then again, most of these large cities know how to run a public transportation system too ...

My frustration stems mostly from the hypocrisy of it all. Chicago is touted as a green frontrunner in some areas. Daley constantly touts his grand plans for being an eco-friendly. And our fearless leaders thought they could put together a low-carbon, "blue-green" Olympics in 2016. Ha! We can't even get a recycling program functioning.

Given the economic situation worldwide, I doubt Chicago is the only city facing cuts, fees and tough decisions. But that does mean it should stop running. For example, San Francisco recently launched its required composting and recycling program Wednesday, with up to $1000 in fines for those who refuse to participate.

Hey, that's one way to earn money while still providing city services.

What I want to know is, what are they going to cut next? Trash pickup? Road repair? Electricity to street lamps? Fine, perhaps more extreme than altering the recycling program, which I know is not at the top of most people's list of necessities. But, to me it's a big deal--and a sign of worse things to come.

Share this entry

  • Share on Facebook
  • Tweet this entry
  • Stumble this entry
  • Digg this entry
  • Email this entry

Recommended for you

Leave a comment

5 Comments

Jim C. said:

default userpic local-auth auth-type-mt

Let's hope they're sensible and reduce pickups to areas where there isn't a lot of recycling. And for those who need more bins, there's a note at the bottom of the recycling schedule pdf that says you can call the city to get them. http://preview.tinyurl.com/yjakfad (not the pdf, page links to the pdf)

Supriya Doshi said:

user-pic

I certainly hope they're that sensible. Though it's interesting that they recently launched a rewards programs in areas where recycling wasn't taking off. I wonder if this will affect that at all.

And thanks for the link referring readers on how to get more blue bins!

Jon-David said:

user-pic

I wonder, with groups like mine, The Green Ministry, and Faith in Place, and the national/local group Interfaith Power and Light, if this could be the jelling cause that we could all work on. Could we, as responsable groups, pool our congregations to get our city to adopt a fines/education/funds bill to our city constitutions? I know it would take time. Maybe years. But I think I could really get into this one.

Jen said:

user-pic

Oh my..I could rant and rave for days but I'll try to keep it to a minimum.. Heaven forbid Daley takes some of those "rainy day funds" that has no oversight to begin with, to use towards things we NEED, like recycling.. "Trying not to commit more resources" towards recycling is beyond my understanding. I'm sorry, but what should we be committing our tax dollars to then? Perhaps building more crappy condos that won't sell to begin with, or paying those with political clout more and more each year, that don't really positively contribute to anyone's lives to begin with? Wow.. Daley needs to get it together and fast. If he can spend all of that time and money towards Olympics advertising that was being done, then he can scrounge up the money for recycling. Good grief.

Supriya Doshi said:

user-pic

Agreed! A handful of those ads probably could have made a dent in the funds required to keep the recycling program functioning properly.

Thanks for the comment!

Leave a Comment?

Some HTML is permitted: a, strong, em

What your comment will look like:

said:

what will you say?

Our Bloggerati

RedEye We're not just a newspaper, we're a lifestyle. Keep up with RedEye 24/7.
Geek to Me Elliott Serrano is RedEye's resident geek with an eye towards all things nerd-related.
Off the Markley Stephen Markley: being a 20-something average dude isn't as easy as it looks.
Kyles Files RedEye's Kyra Kyles puts a local spin on pop culture.
Show Patrol He's snarky and sweet. Bitchy and ballsy. He's Curt Wagner, a lover of TV ... and other things.
iPhone, therefore, iBlog Live mobile-ly, gadget-y and happ-ily with Scott Kleinberg.
Accidentally Sexy Ana Fernatt says a girl should be two things: classy and fabulous.
The Puzzler Solve riddles and play games with our resident Puzzlemaster, Sandy Weisz.
RedEye Royalty A blog powered entirely by RedEye's social media posse

Subscribe via Email