My good friend Steve Soucie was able to bring this to my attention a few days ago.
At this time of the year, I'm the first to admit that things can and will slide past me at times. I get so zoned in and so focused on the tasks at hand that sometimes the slightest small change can just slip by for whatever reason.
Yet this slight change, compliments of the Chicago Public League, can and will have huge ramifications come IHSA Playoff Pairings night in late October.
According to a new change in the Chicago Public League for this
season, the four Chicago division conferences will be allowed to have
it's top two teams eligible for the IHSA state playoffs if those teams
also meet the IHSA state playoff requirements like every other team in
the state is required.
On the surface, I know
your thinking. "You go CPL Chicago teams" and "it's about time" and
"why weren't these teams always eligible for the state playoffs
anyways?"
Now, the reality of this all and the potential ramifications come state playoff night?
The
CPL football folks have done a very good job of managing it's teams and
putting the CPL programs in the right direction. Yet this could be a
decision that the CPL folks could very well regret as soon as the
opening round of the state playoffs begin in late October this year.
Under
this new scenario using last year's CPL Chicago conference results, six
teams that stayed home from the state playoffs would now be eligible.
Amundsen,
Senn, Hope, Ag Science, Orr and Farragut would all get slotted into the
state playoff field this year using last season's records.
While
these teams would look equal on paper and more importantly they would
remain equal to it's opposing playoff opponents when it comes to the
state playoff seeding system, the Chicago conference schools would have
a very difficult road facing some potential CPL Illini conference teams
along with facing several suburban teams in the opening round of the
state playoffs.
Again, I'm not doing this to
bag on the Chicago Public League teams at all. The Illini conference
teams are heads and shoulders better than the Chicago conferences and
it's proven already that the top Illini conference teams can and will
compete with the better city and suburban programs.
Yet
allowing the Chicago conference schools into the state playoffs might
seem like a good idea and the fair thing to do, but when those same
teams get hammered on the field to me it's more than winning and
losing. It becomes a safety issue. Do any kids really benefit from say
a 50-0 opening round playoff loss on either side of the field?
So
far this season, the handful of CPL Chicago conference teams who have
dared to play outside of the city haven't fared too well.
Dyett
lost to Rolling Meadows 48-0. Schurz lost to Maine East 19-9, as East
was able to end it's 39 game losing streak. DuSable lost to Aurora
Christian 47-0. Corliss lost to Rochelle 38-6 and to Edwardsville last
Saturday 46-0.
I could keep going but I think you get the picture.
You'll
always have a few exceptions. Bogan is off to a 2-0 start and the
Bengals beat suburban Tinley Park 22-15. I saw the Bengals at a 7 on 7
this summer and they have some very solid looking kids, but Bogan might
be the rare exception here.
Under this new
playoff scenario, your also keeping 6 teams home with 5-4 records who
might otherwise could be a very capable state playoff team. We've seen
several 5-4 state playoff teams make a big time playoff push. Yet now
under this system, those potential sleeper teams with a chance could be
at home.
Seeding effect? A 7-2 or 8-1 CPL
Chicago conference team will get seeded the same way a 7-2 or 8-1
DuPage Valley or Chicago Catholic Blue team will get seeded. That's the
state's playoff system.
The effect of this change on the overall playoff system?
Most
of the CPL Chicago Conference teams by glance would fall in the 6A/7A
field, thus "pushing down" several potential enrollment bubble teams in
classification. So teams like defending Class 6A state champion
Springfield Sacred Heart Griffin or Joliet Catholic, both of whom have
the same enrollment for football purposes and who are literally on the
6A/5A fence would get "pushed down" into 5A and then everyone else
would feel that same "push down" effect from say 6A on down.
It
might not seem like much to do about nothing, but explain that to the
fans of 5A football and below and see the response you'll get.
In
short, while I understand the need for the CPL to add teams to the
state playoff mix, it this really the best move for the overall CPL
conference and the state playoff system?
I have my doubts. Then again if it was up to me we'd still have just 6 classes of state playoffs, so what do I know anyways.
2 Comments
jeff said:
Hello Edgy,
Just to understand the effect of this. Using Plainfield Central as an example. Central has lost their first 2 games of the season to Marist and Lyons. If they lost 2 conference games they would finish with a 5-4 record. Good enough to make the playoffs considering their tough games against Marist and Lyons. They could be edged out of the playoffs due to this change. Am I correct?
Thanks Edgy and great work!
edgytim said:
Yes your correct in this scenario. Just remember that not all 5-4 teams get in and the playoff point cut off could also be much higher this year, leading to less 5-4 teams getting in.
Leave a Comment?
What your comment will look like:
said: