<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/district-299/2009/10/when-newspapers-pretend-were-blind.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/district-299/2009/10/when-newspapers-pretend-were-blind.xml" />
  <id>tag:www.chicagonow.com,2011:/blogs/district-299//52/tag:www.chicagonow.com,2009:/blogs/district-299//52.27523-</id>
  <updated>2011-03-18T06:07:27Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Do Newspapers Think We&apos;re Blind?</title>
  <subtitle>Covering the Chicago Public School system</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.261</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.chicagonow.com,2009:/blogs/district-299//52.27523</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/district-299/2009/10/when-newspapers-pretend-were-blind.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.chicagonow.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=52/entry_id=27523" title="Do Newspapers Think We're Blind?" />
    <published>2009-10-28T19:15:52Z</published>
    <updated>2009-10-28T15:23:43Z</updated>
    <title>Do Newspapers Think We&apos;re Blind?</title>
    <summary><![CDATA[Sometimes I'm convinced that mainstream journalists (printer reporters, editors, TV news stations, etc) think we're idiots.&nbsp; Especially when it comes to ignoring things that we may have read on each others' pages.&nbsp; The latest example of this is the New...]]></summary>
    <author>
      <name>Alexander Russo</name>
      <uri>http://www.chicagonow.com/profiles/AlexanderRusso</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="media_watch" label="Media Watch" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/district-299/">
<![CDATA[
      <span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><div class="pkg embedded-image left" style="width: 140px;"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/district-299/assets_c/2009/10/20050830_020101_BlindSign%21_thum-thumb-140x131-27336.jpg" title="20050830_020101_BlindSign!_thum.jpg"><img alt="20050830_020101_BlindSign!_thum.jpg" src="http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/district-299/assets_c/2009/10/20050830_020101_BlindSign%21_thum-thumb-140x131-27336.jpg" class="mt-image-left" height="131" width="140" /></a></div></span>Sometimes I'm convinced that mainstream journalists (printer reporters, editors, TV news stations, etc) think we're idiots.&nbsp; Especially when it comes to ignoring things that we may have read on each others' pages.&nbsp; <br /><br />The latest example of this is the New York Times, which today is running a story about the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/28/education/28educ.html?_r=1&amp;partner=rss&amp;emc=rss">growing influence of the Gates Foundation</a> over education issues.&nbsp; Thing is, Associated Press ran <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hbgrCIW2skw4GNHrYBvgFyMoXVVwD9BIDPVO0">pretty much the same story</a> just a few days ago.&nbsp; But you'd never know that from the Times, which seems to be pretending that the AP story never happened.&nbsp; <br /><br />I understand the instinct -- competition, insecurity -- and the long history of papers ordering up copycat stories but not acknowledging the reason why.&nbsp; But this only works of you're sure your readers never read anyone else.&nbsp; And that seems pretty unlikely in this day and age. &nbsp; 
      
]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.chicagonow.com,2009:/blogs/district-299//52.27523-comment:120878</id>

    

    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/district-299/2009/10/when-newspapers-pretend-were-blind.html#comment-120878" />
    <title>Comment from District299Reader on 2009-10-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>District299Reader</name>
        <uri>http://www.chicagonow.com/profiles/District299reader</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Isn't AP a news service, which papers buy so they can reprint/reshape them from the paper? Now with the Internet, we can read AP stories from AP itself without the paper as a medium.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-29T01:46:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.chicagonow.com,2009:/blogs/district-299//52.27523-comment:120949</id>

    

    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/district-299/2009/10/when-newspapers-pretend-were-blind.html#comment-120949" />
    <title>Comment from District299Reader on 2009-10-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>District299Reader</name>
        <uri>http://www.chicagonow.com/profiles/District299reader</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Yes. If the reports call youth "CPS students" then we'll see it just that way. <a href="http://www.chicagobreakingnews.com/2009/10/man-killed-in-drive-by-shooting-in-bronzeville.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.chicagobreakingnews.com/2009/10/man-killed-in-drive-by-shooting-in-bronzeville.html</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-29T04:01:16Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>

