Do Newspapers Think We're Blind?

user-pic
20050830_020101_BlindSign!_thum.jpg
Sometimes I'm convinced that mainstream journalists (printer reporters, editors, TV news stations, etc) think we're idiots.  Especially when it comes to ignoring things that we may have read on each others' pages. 

The latest example of this is the New York Times, which today is running a story about the growing influence of the Gates Foundation over education issues.  Thing is, Associated Press ran pretty much the same story just a few days ago.  But you'd never know that from the Times, which seems to be pretending that the AP story never happened. 

I understand the instinct -- competition, insecurity -- and the long history of papers ordering up copycat stories but not acknowledging the reason why.  But this only works of you're sure your readers never read anyone else.  And that seems pretty unlikely in this day and age.  

Share this entry

  • Share on Facebook
  • Tweet this entry
  • Stumble this entry
  • Digg this entry
  • Email this entry

Recommended for you

2 Comments

District299Reader said:

user-pic

Isn't AP a news service, which papers buy so they can reprint/reshape them from the paper? Now with the Internet, we can read AP stories from AP itself without the paper as a medium.

District299Reader said:

user-pic

Yes. If the reports call youth "CPS students" then we'll see it just that way. http://www.chicagobreakingnews.com/2009/10/man-killed-in-drive-by-shooting-in-bronzeville.html

Leave a Comment?

Some HTML is permitted: a, strong, em

What your comment will look like:

said:

what will you say?

Subscribe via Email

ChicagoNow.com on Digg

POWERED BY digg

ChicagoNow.com on Facebook