Kap's Corner

The Blackhawks Cannot Win Big With Huet in Net

Enthusiasm for the Chicago Blackhawks is at a fever pitch. And with the season underway and the Hawks roster loaded with outstanding talent, it is not a surprise that several national publications including Sports Illustrated are predicting a run at a Stanley Cup.

However, after watching Huet play last season and the start of this season, and talking with a handful of excellent NHL sources, it is obvious to me that the Blackhawks have no chance to contend for a title if Huet is their #1 goaltender. He allows far too many soft goals, and he has no proven track record of success, which would allow a team to believe that he can turn around a shaky start to the season.

Tonight's performance against the Calgary Flames was awful. He allowed 3 goals in less than 8 minutes and two of the three goals he should have definitely stopped with the third goal somewhat questionable on whether or not he should have handled it. Calgary's first-period goals came in a span of 5:29. Dustin Boyd, Eric Nystrom and Jarome Iginla ended Huet's night with goals within 53 seconds of each other, and Rene Bourque and Olli Jokinen padded the lead.
Next up is a huge decision for Blackhawks coach Joel Quenneville because with Edmonton coming into the United Center on Wednesday evening Coach Q has to decide if he goes back to Huet or starts Antti Niemi, who played well after a shaky start when he replaced Huet. The problem with playing Huet on Wednesday evening is this: playing the Oilers means the return of Nikolai Khabibulin and a probable ovation he will receive when he takes the ice. Combine that with the expected booing that Huet will receive and you have a recipe for disaster if Huet struggles again and Khabibulin is solid and leads Edmonton to a victory.
Huet in net.jpg

Is Cristobal Huet the answer in goal for the Blackhawks? He has struggled to start the 2009-10 season.


Emotionally, a rough night on Wednesday could cause long term confidence problems for Huet, who is making big time money and has never really proven himself as a top flight NHL goalie. He has never won a playoff series in his career and he has only played as many as 51 games once in his career. While many fans think he is a young, developing goalie that is not the case. Huet is 34 years old. So the hope that his best hockey is in front of him may not be realistic.

So what can the Blackhawks do to solve their goal tending problems? Well, with cap space at a premium and the ability to trade Huet and his big contract (2009-10, 2010-11, and 2011-12 at 5.65 million per season) unlikely, how do the Hawks make a move knowing that their best chance to win a Stanley Cup with their current collection of young talent may be this season? They can put Huet on waivers, which he will no doubt clear as no team in the league would claim him and his contract.

They can then reassign him to Rockford where they would be obligated to pay him his salary, but his money would not count towards the NHL salary cap thereby giving the Hawks much more flexibility to make a move or two to improve their club before the trade deadline.

However, if they take that drastic step of sending Huet to the minors, they have to add a goalie who can start on a team with championship aspirations. Just who that would be is up for debate because most teams are not ready to trade a starting caliber goalie just 5 games into the season unless the Blackhawks are willing to overpay dramatically by giving up some promising young talent.

Do the Hawks believe that Huet can carry them to the Stanley Cup or at least deep into the playoffs? Does Huet have a confidence problem that could be a long term problem for the team to overcome? Just watch and see who is in the net on Wednesday night against Edmonton and you will get your answer. If it is Huet, you could say that Quenneville believes in him and wants to get him right back in the net after tonight's rough start. If it is Niemi you could look at it as Quenneville wanting to protect Huet with Khabibulin in town.

Then again, perhaps Quenneville knows he cannot win with Huet and by playing him against Edmonton and perhaps seeing him embarrassed he will drive home the point to management that he needs a new goalie. Perhaps he wants to show that if the team is to achieve the heights that everyone is expecting of them, the Hawks have to make a move for a goalie now before they find themselves looking up at a handful of teams in the standings.

So what goalie will Quenneville play on Wednesday evening? We will know that answer soon enough, and that decision should tell us a lot about the confidence he has in Cristobal Huet. If he has none, then the Blackhawks better make a move for a goalie and they better move quickly. Time's a wasting for a team with championship aspirations. 

Recommended

[?]

Recent Posts

Subscribe

Leave a comment

5 Comments

Wood said:

default userpic local-auth auth-type-mt

Huet is not that bad. He's not getting any help in front at all. There are too many defensive breakdowns and odd man rushes.

mbeck3000 said:

default userpic local-auth auth-type-mt

well. he IS that bad.. wheres the consistency of a 'NHL starting goaltender"? its not there..i would be more than happy to give up a decent hawk (like versteeg, etc), if we moved Huet... hoping the 'osgood theory' (average goaltending is enough if you have the offense, like Detroit) wont cut it for chicago. someone call Ed Belfour already!

Amber said:

default userpic local-auth auth-type-mt

I agree with Wood. Huet was there for the Hawks last year when Khabby got hurt. People need to realize that while Huet is the last defense, he's not the only defense. However, I do agree he needs to tighten up his goal tending. But many, many of the goals given up can not be blamed soley on Huet.

Also, he's given up less soft goals than last year, which is a big improvement for him.

tom said:

default userpic local-auth auth-type-mt

Go with Crawford and Niemi.Never should have signed Huet.They knew they wouldn't resign Khabibulin so they should have had either Crawford or Niemi as backup last year to give them some experience to take over this year and have the other one be backup this year

VegasHawksFan said:

user-pic

Well that settles it. Kap says we can't win a cup so let's just give up and concede this year and nod with acknowledgment that every game they lose is just another stride closer to the inevitable.

Was this column co-written by Jay Mariotti?

Leave a Comment?

Some HTML is permitted: a, strong, em

What your comment will look like:

said:

what will you say?

Most Active Pages Right Now

ChicagoNow.com on Facebook