LaMarcus Aldridge agrees to extension

user-pic
Per Yahoo Sports Twitter, Portland's lengthy negotiations with LaMarcus Aldridge have resulted in an agreement for a 5 year, $70 million extension, with a follow-up tweet announcing a slightly lesser figure.

Of the entire 2006 draft, only three players have signed extensions. First overall pick Andrea Bargnani got a 5 year, $50 million extension, and now Aldridge (second overall pick, tecnically) has signed for $70 million. The other to sign is another Blazer, Brandon Roy, who last month signed a maximum deal through 2015. No one else has signed an extension, and few look like they're going to.

Tyrus Thomas hasn't got one.




It wasn't the strongest first round draft in the world. Despite only three seasons having passed since the draft, ten of the players aren't even on their rookies contracts any more. Joel Freeland never signed; Shannon Brown and Patrick O'Bryant lasted only two seasons of their rookie deals; Quincy Douby, Marcus Williams and Mouhamed Sene were waived partway through year three; Maurice Ager, Cedric Simmons, Shelden Williams and Rodney Carney did not have their fourth year option exercised. An eleventh player, Shawne Williams, is staring down the barrel of a buyout from the Mavericks, due to both continued ill-discipline and bad play.

That's a third of the first round that didn't even get to the end of their rookie deal. Not good.

Of the remaining 16 players, hardly any seem likely to sign an extension. Adam Morrison is barely in the league, propping up the Lakers inactive list. Oleksiy Pecherov isn't eligible for one, having signed a year late (and he may not get his fourth year option exercised). And players such as J.J. Redick, Hilton Armstrong, Sergio Rodriguez, Jordan Farmer, Renaldo Balkman, Mardy Collins and Josh Boone are at the back end of their team's rotations, thus highly unlikely to get tied down for long.

The only players left over are Kyle Lowry, Thabo Sefolosha, Tyrus Thomas, Rudy Gay, Rajon Rondo, Ronnie Brewer and Randy Foye. Those players have about a week to sign an extension, and not many of them are talking. We're certainly not talking to Tyrus, and the Celtics are apparently not talking to Rondo about an extension either (if you believe that). Utah and Brewer are talking, and both sides want a deal to get done, but that might be the only other one forthcoming; Memphis are talking to Gay, but an extension is currently considered "unlikely," and the rest do not appear to be in talks.

Out of a 30 man first round draft class, that's a pretty poor return. But at least Aldridge got one.



Is Aldridge's new extension overpaying? Maybe. He's improved year on year, and is good enough to return great stats across the board; 19.1 PER, 9.5 win shares, +484 net points, averages of 18.1ppg and 7.5rpg in only his third season in the league. That's good stuff by any metric. But it's not elite stuff, nor is it one notch below it. It's probably two notches below it, and for all the good numbers, his true shooting percentage of .523% and his poor rebounding percentage of 12.5% offer quite a bit of room for improvement.

Nevertheless, the new extension seems him paid basically the same as Al Jefferson, a highly comparable player in terms of production, if not in style. Jefferson signed a 5 year, $65 million deal last season, for an average of $13 million a season, and with the exception of last year's injury afflicted season, his career trajectory has been pretty much the same as Aldridge's. (They're also the same age.) Aldridge's average of up to $14 million a season sounds like a hell of a lot, mainly because it is, and something nearer to an average of $12.5 to $13 mil a season may have been more befitting. But the different between the two is largely negligible, and so even if Portland has overpaid in this extension, it shouldn't factor.

Even if they have overpaid him, Portland can afford it. A few years ago, they had a payroll that roughly doubled the salary cap, perfectly willing to take on much more salary even when doing so wasn't a great idea (see also; Shawn Kemp and Derek Anderson). That was due to the outrageously deep pockets of their owner Paul Allen, pockets which haven't gotten any shallower. The Aldridge extension, their intent to spend big in free agency this year (which didn't really work out, but still) and the max contract for Roy should represent the beginning of another era of big spending; if you can't pony up for a young core like that, then you shouldn't be an NBA owner.

They're also able to pay Aldridge because he's a proven high calibre player, one of the better power forwards in the world, an ever-improving 24 year old who produces consistently n both ends on the floor. While he may not be faultless, particularly with his rebounding and his inability to draw foul shots, he's also highly productive, with yet more potential for improvement in front of him. He's not caught in a positional crisis, he's not perpetually trying to do things that he can't do and trying to become a player ill-suited to his skills, he's not putting up numbers comparable to the likes of Ryan Gomes and Jason Thompson, and he's not struggling to outproduce his backup.

Portland have decided that these are more important attributes to have in a player than how they react to a 1000 yard stare over a dinner table.

So they've got that going for them.

Share this entry

  • Share on Facebook
  • Tweet this entry
  • Stumble this entry
  • Digg this entry
  • Email this entry

Recommended for you

Leave a comment

16 Comments

Newskoolbulls said:

user-pic

Good stuff Mark. Its overpaying but not quite compared to Bargs who got a big deal who really only started showing true signs in year three while LA has been doing it from the moment he stepped on the court. As for guys like Rondo, Gay, and Brewer why are they not getting paid? Gay is the face of the sad franchise in Memphis and Rondo is a top 5 pg in the league who I bet really must not care for the way he has been treated by Doc and Ainge and as for Brewer he started coming along nicely and even developed more of an offensive game.

RPK said:

user-pic

I have to say that unless Aldridge is a perennial all star, or even occasional all star, this is definitely a bad contract for them. Being from Chicago, we should know what a bad contract is (example - Luol Deng).

Just wondering...Do you think Tyrus Thomas might bit a weeee bit jealous that his fellow draft buddy LaMarcus Aldridge just signed a mega-deal extension? There's going to be some tension in the Berto center this year when Tyrus is not starting and the realization as to how much this is hurting his future bank account starts to set it.

Mark Deeks said:

user-pic

All motivation is good motivation. If he thrives on jealousy, that'll do.

TheStig said:

default userpic local-auth auth-type-mt

LA is much better than Deng and unlike Deng actually streches the floor for his postion. Bigs always get overpaid, he probably would have gotten a max contract next year by someone who stuck out in 2010. This isn't a bad deal, might of overpaid a little but LA is not Mr Glass.

Doug Thonus said:

user-pic

Really? LaMarcus Aldridge, in three years in the league, had heart surgery, a separated shoulder, and I believe a broken toe (though not sure about the last one).

In two years of college he lost a year to a major hip injury as well.

Deng's more of a fear with injury because he's coming off of a major one this year whereas Aldridge is not, but I don't think you would make that statement at any other point in their careers.

TheStig said:

default userpic local-auth auth-type-mt

His injuries don't take him out of games. He has played in 75+ games the past two years and only missed one game last year. He missed 19 games as a rookie but other than that has been very reliable. Deng has missed 19 or more games in a year 3 times in his career. He has only played 75+ games a year twice and averages twice as many missed games per year as LA.

Doug Thonus said:

user-pic

This deal reminds me a lot of Luol Deng's deal. You have a player who's good but not great, probably doesn't have potential to be great, and has had quite a few injury problems already. Granted, Deng signed his deal and then had the worst injury of his career, and I'm not suggesting Aldridge is going to go out and have a stress fracture, but Aldridge's injury history prior to the deal is probably worse than Deng's.

Much like Deng, he's probably gettingt 1-2 million more than he's worth per year when healthy and playing well, but it's easy to justify that amount as a minor overspending. What we've found with Deng is that when you overpay by 1-2 million a year for good performance if something happens to make that performance go down then you're really in trouble. As long as Aldridge continues to deliver what he is then he'll be an asset even if he's a slightly overpriced one, but because he's starting off overpriced means he has the potential to become an albatross.

TheStig said:

default userpic local-auth auth-type-mt

I think you really underestimate LA. He isn't a world beater but he is a very solid PF with only one real weakness being his rebounding. He is putting up 18 and 7.5 on a nice fg%. Bigs are far rarer than SFs. Deng is an average SF while LA is an above average PF.

Doug Thonus said:

user-pic

Other side note is this ruined one of my plans for next season which was max Aldridge and dare Portland to match. I wasn't a huge fan of the plan because we'd be overpaying Aldridge by even more (see downsides above). However, given how close this is to a max deal, it seems clear that Portland would have matched the max contract anyway.

johnfriendly said:

default userpic local-auth auth-type-mt

Love the comment about the stare across the dinner table. Do you think Skiles was making a pass at Aldridge?

In a related note how is it that just a couple of years after making a major scouting/draft blunder with TT over Aldridge, Forman and Paxson are promoted in the Bulls organization? Does that tell you something about Reinsdorf's style? I say it does, i.e. loyalty trumps competency.

Doug Thonus said:

user-pic

No GM in the league would last more than three years by your standards of firing them after a single mistake.

From Reinsdorf's perspective, he's probably reasonably pleased with the fact that his franchise has made more money under the Paxson regime than any other franchise in the NBA by a massive margin (probably double the next closest team).

johnfriendly said:

default userpic local-auth auth-type-mt

You think drafting TT was a "single mistake?" Did you conveniently forget FA contracts to Pippen and Wallace? And who said anything about firing, I mentioned promotion.

Do you attribute Bulls profitablity to Paxson's performance? I guess it is ok then to have a middle of the pack team as long as you are making the most money. Then Kupchak is a comparative failure because the Lakers didn't make as much money as the Bulls. Truly delusional.

Doug Thonus said:

user-pic

I'm thinking from Reinsdorf's perspective, Paxson and Forman have done a great job. The team was starting to lose attendance and was going to be in trouble.

Paxson/Forman came in and very quickly brought excitement and attendance back to the team. They started with one of the worst hands in the league five years ago and got the ship righted after one season.

I'd prefer a championship, which decisions do you think you would have made that would have delivered one? There is no set of circumstances that would have delivered one by now, and the fact that they drafted Derrick Rose probably puts them closer to a title now than at any point previously mitigating the cost of any previous mistakes due to the luck of the draw.

I doubt very much that Paxson got a raise with his "promotion", and I'm not sure if Forman did either. It sounds more like the pair just got new titles and split up the same work that they were already doing a little differently.

Is the Bulls front office the best in the league? Probably not, but kupchak is the guy who traded Caron Butler for Kwame Brown which is just as bad as anything the Bulls have done, and it was done with far more info at his disposal as Brown/Butler were already established players when he did it.

How many rings would he have GM'd a team to if he didn't have Kobe Bryant and an owner willing to break the bank on payroll with disregard to the luxury tax?

Is Paxson the best GM in the league? Probably not, however, he's easily in the top 15 IMO.

Mark Deeks said:

user-pic

Paxson got pretty much everything wrong in the 2006 offseason. Other than that, he's been good.

Daniel7123 said:

default userpic local-auth auth-type-mt

on a completely separate note...
as I recall when jefferson signed his deal people were saying he was under paid

Mark Deeks said:

user-pic

Well, he's kind of overrated, so that's probably to be expected.

Leave a Comment?

Some HTML is permitted: a, strong, em

What your comment will look like:

said:

what will you say?

Subscribe via Email

ChicagoNow.com on Digg

POWERED BY digg

ChicagoNow.com on Facebook