Blackhawks Cup talk is fools gold, drop the puke and just play

My grumpy old man season preview for the Blackhawks won't take long. No lists. No math. No solace.
I'll make it short and sour. Shut up already, all you dumb bastards.
Shut up about the Stanley Cup finals being within reach. Shut up about One Goal. Shut up about Cup or Bust.
Once again, the Blackhawks have to learn a hard lesson from the Detroit Red Wings. Drop the puke and play.
All those wing-ding haters out there will despise this, but that omnipresent octopus is already ahead of the Hawks in delivering logical, cogent insights to the road ahead.
Detroit 1, Blackhawks 0 after the first round of propaganda.
"Every year that we've been here there's been something wrong with us," Red Wings coach Mike Babcock told the Detroit News about their scolding increase of skeptics before opening the season in Stockholm, Sweden, against St. Louis. "We are just going to play and see what happens."
Copy that please and hand it out to the Blackhawks in Helsinki, Finland, where they open the season Friday against Florida. If no one on the Hawks reads a book for the rest of their lives, they should brush up on how to talk like a champion from these Cliff Notes.
Babcock could be taunting and sneering at the Hawks as the team that's already beaten him in some predictions, if not on ice. He knows better. He's willing to wait for the games. He has history on his side and history often kicks ass.
If the Blackhawks were more interested in winning than marketing, they would impose a ban on anyone in their organization admitting or hinting at championship aspirations. I'm willing to share royalty rights for SHUT UP ALREADY, ALL YOU DUMB BASTARDS.
It'd look nice hanging from the 300 level with the Indian giving you the fish eye.
After 48 years of dream scenarios being as lucid as a LSD hallucination, except for the odd year or two, to lend an ounce of credence to a Cup being likely or probable or possible in Chicago is simply playing with fools gold.
In seven months, I also could tell you in a preview that I will have won the lottery, been recognized for my hidden literary skills, buried my enemies, and convinced my wife that I require a 21-year-old, hot-looking nanny to brush up on my French. But 60 years on this earth have convinced me to shut up already, you dumb bastard.
"If anything else, it just allows us to play and not worry," Detroit winger Kirk Maltby said about the Wings being doubted by some national hockey experts. "We put enough pressure on ourselves knowing what the expectations are around here.
"If the outside hockey world wants to write us off or knock us down, that's better for us. We will just worry about what we can do.
"We know we will have another opportunity to be there at the end. If others don't believe it, so be it. It won't be the first time we've proved them wrong."
If the common sense reasoning by Babcock and Maltby doesn't scare the hell out of Blackhawk fans, then you're too ignorant to be worth yelling at, drunk or sober. These guys think as well as they play.
Detroit is dangerously inside the Blackhawks' heads as insidiously as that alien was writhing and sloshing inside Sigourney Weaver. The Hawks have to find a way to beat them mentally and physically.
That one goal should be plenty to occupy their time until April and their supposed coronation march.
"Any time you finish in the top two in the league like we have, top four, year after year, there's really only one direction to go," Babcock boasted in the nicest way possible. "But we've done a good job of maintaining year after year...I don't think we're going away, but only time will tell."
The Blackhawks have yet to show they can maintain anything except a summer news cycle with off-ice follies. They have made one solid postseason run. Let me repeat--one. And that has led to cries from their locker room by Patrick Kane of "Cup or bust" and visions of glory from Hither and Yon, who might also be in the goalie race.
Since Kane has been around just 20 of the 48-year championship drought in Chicago, I guess we can excuse his excessive exuberance, as he long as he learns he should shoot the puck more than his mouth. Less passing, more shooting, and he should score 45 to 50 goals.
Here's another off-ice reason to separate Detroit and the Blackhawks. Newspaper writers who cover the Red Wings have been actually in Sweden getting first-hand info, while some of the Blackhawks writers are chained to their desk or La-Z-Boy in Chicago, forced to receive fake postcards from players rubbing it in by telling them what was on the menu last night and adding how this team is so busy kissing each other it's a love-in.
I assume they'll stay out of jackpots that way by not kissing Finland's finest frauleins or fillies or whatever they're called. Doesn't sound like any hockey team I covered, but times change, I guess. One thing doesn't.
Hockey still isn't considered a real sport in Chicago.
With bankruptcy in vogue in the print business, some editors would rather pay for Ask Amy to write some more column postcards herself from Finland to tell us what it's like to spend a week there as a hooker rather than lay down some hard cash for on-sight coverage of hooks and slashes.
Rather than talk the usual about the Hawks' strengths and weaknesses, and there are plenty of both, I want to continue to scare you by listening some more to the Red Wings, who just never once got around to telling the Detroit News what they ate for dinner.
"I think we are going to be a really, really good hockey team," Tomas Holmstrom said. "You can't think it's going to just go by itself. You have to work hard for success."
The Detroit News writes: "The defense, led by six-time Norris Trophy winner Nicklas Lidsrom and Brian Rafalski, should be stronger for having rookie Jonathan Ericsson for a full season. He emerged as a reliable force on the blue line in the playoffs.
"The Wings' strength still lies in their depth, four strong lines and arguably the best defensive core in the league."
Ah, not everyone thinks the Wings got weaker,even losing Marian Hossa to the Hawks. Maybe their hometown paper, but maybe they have a point.
"We lost three guys who produced a lot of points," Henrik Zetterberg said. "But the good thing with this organization is they always find guys to replace them. I don't think there will be any problem with our production."
The consensus is the Blackhawks have enough offense to overcome a lack of muscle on defense and some possible goaltending inconsistencies. Maltby said the Wings relied on offense last regular season too much. Could the Hawks be saying that a year from now?
"Maybe we relied on our offense too much," Maltby said of the regular season. "We learned that in the playoffs last year."
The Hawks easily could outscore the Wings this season. But can they out-play them? Can they play better defense?
Even if they can, there's a few other strong teams to get past. The 1990-91 Hawks won the NHL President's Trophy with a 49-23-8 record (28-8-4 at home) and lost to Minnesota in the first round of the playoffs.
Let's keep our eye on the next goal--and that's not the Stanley Cup.
It's the Florida Panthers. Start small, stay focused and shut up about a championship. You will win nothing by hallucinating.
Even grumpy old men have hopes. They just know it's rare to see them come true. Until they do, keep your dreams to yourself. You might end up rooming with Milton Bradley, you know.
Share this entry
Recommended for you
14 Comments
Forklift said:
"puke"?
Mike Kiley said:
period, pimp, punk, porn, prude and Palin. Better than a Radek Smolanek feature of his Russian career.
60sblackhawk said:
Are we talking about a 4 or 5th place finish in the Division? Tha would be sad, especially considering the Blackhawks may have to re-build from scratch at the end of the season since they are loosing Toews, Kane and Keith due to cap issues.
Mike Kiley said:
Naw. Even I'm not enough of a killjoy to infer that. The Hawks will be good, good, good. Better than Detroit? Maybe. But it won't be easy. I'm not sure everyone knows that.
Dan said:
"The consensus is the Blackhawks have enough offense to overcome a lack of muscle on defense"...good observation. You need to SHUT UP...you dumb bastard. Keith/Seabrook is one of the most elite defensemen pairings in the NHL. If you honestly think the Wings will be as great as they were last season...you've lost your mind. Have fun replacing Hossa, Hudler, Kopecky and Samuelsson with Williams, Eaves and Todd "the terrible" Bertuzzi...
Mike Kiley said:
Don't go stealing my bastard slogans willy-nilly. It's sacred ground. Plus, I called myself a bastard first. No fair piling on even if the NHL still believes in checks to the head.
60sblackhawk said:
Do you think they wil keep Keith, Toews, and Kane for the entire season, or trade them from as much as they can get at the trade deadline in February -- or do they just loose them for draft picks in June of 2010?
Do you think the Blackhawks shuld be pro-active and trade the three before the season ends and get as many picks and other compensation for them? Who else do you see the Blackhawks trading this year?
Mike Kiley said:
My crystal ball is broke. Or is that Cristobal who's broke? How about my dream trade of Huet to anywhere for a good goalie? If Scotty Bowman is such a genius, he should figure that one out and tell the kid.
Dave Morris said:
Hey Mike, I thought Hither and Yon looked pretty damn good on that line with Radek-Al Smolenak.
Since you and I are probably the only Hawks fans left (the rest having gone to that big rink in the sky or simply gone mad) who actually remember watching the Black Hawks beat the Red Wings for the Stanley Vegetable Steamer, we win The Big Nothing for our insight.
Isn't that special?
Actually, I don't mind this current version of the Hawkey Flock one bit. Sure, they don't have names like Nesterenko, Chico, and Moose, and nobody will ever shoot a puck like Bobby and Dennis, and, and, and...but Captain Serious Toews, 20 Cent Kane and Le Docteur Huet lead a colorful crew. And they can even play hockey, unlike some of the clowns who disguised themselves as Hawks during the previous decade.
Mind you, in our information-crazy universe, premature extrapolation is a habit that compels 'pundits' and other forms of human landfill to spew predictions like molten lava or some other more fetid form of liquid effluent. Phoeey, I tell them and their followers. You heard me right. Phooey.
As you say, play 'em one at a time. And bartender, make this one a double.
Forklift said:
None of The Three will get traded this season. They will all be signed before next season starts.
They currently take up $10MM in cap space, the Hawks only need to clear another 4 or 5, barring more contract finagling (say, give Toews a 12-year deal like Hossa's, where Toews gets an opt-out before the lowball numbers kick in).
If you want to discuss trades, the ones with the most value are Versteeg, Byfuglien and Barker.
60sblackhawk said:
I would really hate to see Barker get traded. He is very good now, and is getting better. I think if they trade Barker, fans will look back at this and be as mad and dissapointed as they were with the Phil Esposito trade in May of 1967.
Alligator Derski said:
I fully admit to believing the Hawks can win it all and discussing it in the open with people. No one in their right mind thinks it's going to be easy, not just getting past the Red Wings, but through the rest of the Western Conference as well. It's a long season and a lot can happen, but if you want Hawk fans to bury their heads in the sand because you think it's creating too much pressure on the team-get a grip man.
I live in the real world and it is obvious that the Hawks have a team that can compete with anyone. By your logic, no one should be talking about winning the Stanley Cup, the Super Bowl, etc. At the end of the day, that is the most important thing, and people are naturally going to assess their team's chances. Hawk fans have not had much to be excited about in recent years, so it's understandable that we would be keyed for the best team we've seen in years.
I don't care if you don't want to talk about the Hawks winning the Cup, but don't tell me not to. I read this blog most days and I like it. (although Morris can be a little much at times, maybe you two should just email on the side to spare everyone the little quips that the MO obviously thinks are super clever.) Just kidding-I like Morris' enthusiasm.
Looking at the facts and how this team is built I do believe they can make a run at the Stanley Cup. Just like any other sport, making the playoffs is not enough; at some point you need to wet your whistle via the Cup. No one thinks it's a shoe-in and even if the Hawks destroy the Wings tonight, we know enough never to count them out or underestimate them.
Also, the players are professionals with a coach who will keep them grounded. I am not worried about them taking anything lightly. If anything, I think they will play this season with a sense of urgency and passion because they know this team as it is won't last much longer. Go Hawks!
Mike Kiley said:
I can usually annoy people well enough all on my own. But I agree that Morris makes me doubly annoying on some occasions with his piquant observations. But he's free to be as much of an irritant as I am. My only point in the story--if I had one--was that some fans are taking the Blackhawk ascendancy for granted. Detroit's been there too many times to be shrugged off without first playing the games. Thanks for reading and giving me a chance to say for the first time in years--see ya later, alligator.
Alligator Derski said:
Sorry for the term paper.
Leave a Comment?
What your comment will look like:
said: